<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.&#x27; in forum &#x27;Virtual Private Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970485</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:18:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:18:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27976557</link>
<description><![CDATA[HELLFIRE posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1856205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1856205');">gilbert_osm</a>:</said><p>to convince clients to replace their WAN head-end equipment just for compatibility with my hardware VPN solution. <br> </p></div>My personal experience?  BAAAAAD idea when you suggest dismantling a customer's network to get YOUR<br>solution in to make it work.<br><br>Otherwise, as I said, VPNTracker sounds like a standard IPSec-compatible VPN client, and IPSec's a standard,<br>so as long as "site to site VPN" and "remote access VPN" is in whatever gear you decide on's spec sheet, you<br>should off to the races.  <br><br>I'd also check smallnetbuilder for some of the SMB gear for other options.<br><br>Regards]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27976557</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:08:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27973269</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Switchman posted this interesting device in another thread, its the closest Ive seen to something your describing....<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_Lite_DS.pdf" >dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/E&middot;&middot;&middot;e_DS.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27973269</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:21:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971579</link>
<description><![CDATA[gilbert_osm posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1691829" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1691829');">HELLFIRE</a>:</said><p>Out of the listed devices on the page -- Sonicwall, Cisco, Watchguard, Netgear, Juniper, Checkpoint<br>-- do you have ANY direct experience with devices from those mfrs?<br><br>Secondly : what's the dollar figure of your budget?  Off the top of my head, the low end for the above<br>vendors is going to be anywhere from several hundred to around $1000USD a pop.  That does NOT<br>include for maintenence contract(s), spares, applicable client licence(s), etc.<br><br>Thirdly : any other requirements of the device?  GigE interfaces? Throughput requirements? Needed <br>interfaces? Requirements for HA / backup connectivity?<br> </p></div>Thanks for your suggestions.<br><br>Yeah, in the past I used Netgear FVS318s and and FVS328 for a total hardware-based solution end-to-end. For that setup, all the routers were performing as WAN-to-LAN / Firewall also, so there was no issue with VPN pass through & NAT. ( I was a Mac consultant for 15 years, then quit for 5 years, now returning to the field.)<br><br>But it was a pain, in the past,  to convince clients to replace their WAN head-end equipment just for compatibility with my hardware VPN solution. This time around I want a drop-in unit that can sit quietly on their LAN, and that I can easily take with me if/when they no longer need my services (or I no longer want their business.)<br><br>I don't want to spend more than $250 per customer / per site. Doesn't have to be GigE-capable, just needs to do a respectable 15-25 Mbit (bit, not byte) throughput for occasional larger file transfers.  <br><br>When I find something workable I will post the details of my solution here for future readers & searchers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971579</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 02:25:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971514</link>
<description><![CDATA[HELLFIRE posted : Out of the listed devices on the page -- Sonicwall, Cisco, Watchguard, Netgear, Juniper, Checkpoint<br>-- do you have ANY direct experience with devices from those mfrs?<br><br>Secondly : what's the dollar figure of your budget?  Off the top of my head, the low end for the above<br>vendors is going to be anywhere from several hundred to around $1000USD a pop.  That does NOT<br>include for maintenence contract(s), spares, applicable client licence(s), etc.<br><br>Thirdly : any other requirements of the device?  GigE interfaces? Throughput requirements? Needed <br>interfaces? Requirements for HA / backup connectivity?<br><br>Just my 00000010bits :<br><br>Sonicwall -- look into the TZ series, fairly affordable, GigE interfaces, can handle what speeds most<br>ISPs can handle, includes content filtering / AV / anti-X (added cost / subscription) and wireless.<br><br>Cisco -- look into an ASA 5505 or 5512X device, 5505 is somewhat dated while 5512X I haven't<br>seen pricing for yet.  Definately "big iron" but NOT for the faint of heart / non-Cisco types.  Also<br>in my experience is the most restrictive from a features perspective.<br><br>Watchguard -- XTM 2 / 3 is the series to look at, fairly full featured but I don't have any direct<br>experience.<br><br>Netgear -- read the datasheets, I do not have any direct experience.<br><br>Juniper -- SSG / SRX series is on par, and oftentimes exceeds Cisco.  Fairly intutive GUI interface<br>for the basics, but the advanced stuff and remote management can be daunting.  Again, not for the<br>faint of heart.  If you could, get a bunch of SSG-5s and rig em up, and you'd be laughing (almost).<br><br>Checkpoint -- read the datasheets, I do not have any direct experience.<br><br>..and as I have an open mind, Zyxel USG series would be under the "affordable" and "GUI for ease of use" category.<br>Recommended you read <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27129032-USG-series-FW-3.00-Comparison" >this</A> thread for the paper specifications and pricing of the device.<br><br>From reading over the specs sheet, VPNTracker's just an IPSec-compatible VPN client for MacOS.  All you need<br>is a device you're comfortable with, get a bunch of them, configure as needed, and ship out -- there's<br>no rocket science really.  I'd just lab up one device and make sure it works before signing the big Purchase<br>Order.<br><br>Once you have the devices, shouldn't be that hard to set up a site-to-site VPN between the sites.<br>One gotcha about this -- are the sites on static IPs or dynamic?  If they're dynamic, DDNS functionality<br>MAY be needed -- this is what I've heard, but I can't comment further as I don't have much direct experience<br>with site to site with a dynamic IP address.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1856205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1856205');">gilbert_osm</a>:</said><p>- I need a software-based solution so that I can be fully mobile on my end. That is non-negotiable.<br> </p></div>Have you ever heard of / tried Hamachi?<br><br>Regards]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971514</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:18:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971411</link>
<description><![CDATA[HarryH3 posted : A few of my customers have WatchGuard firewall devices with VPN capabilities.  I use the WatchGuard VPN client to connect to their network and then I can use Remote Desktop, VNC, web access (great for network printers, scanners and cameras with built-in web servers), netscan, ping, etc. just as if I were sitting in their office, plugged into their data switch.  I also keep a copy of the VPN client on my laptop so if I'm onsite at a different customer site when I get a call, I can use the laptop to connect from wherever I am at the time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27971411</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:13:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970664</link>
<description><![CDATA[gilbert_osm posted : Replies that question my basic assumptions are not useful. Please stick to what I asked.<br><br>- I need a software-based solution so that I can be fully mobile on my end. That is non-negotiable.<br>- The device needs to be cheap enough that I can buy & deploy it affordably, i.e. low capital investment cost on my part. <br><br>I'm sure there are plenty of suitable devices out there, I just need some specific recommendations as a place to begin my research. Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970664</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:34:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970572</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Why would you want to use a client at your end.  More than likely its the customer that should use a client or a predefined SSLVPN download that many business class routers provide.  You on the other hand should get a decent VPN hardware device.  IMHO]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970572</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:07:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>VPN device recommendation for an IT consultant.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970485</link>
<description><![CDATA[gilbert_osm posted : I'm an IT consultant, Mac-focused. I want to set up reliable, secure, full-network access to my customers' small-office networks, ideally by sending them a pre-configured hardware device that they plug in to the LAN side of their network.<br><br>On my side, I want to use the excellent Mac software VPN client "VPNTracker 6".<br><br>Based on the list of devices  compatible with VPNTracker 6 (see here:  ( &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.vpntracker.com/us/admin-interoperability.html" >www.vpntracker.com/us/admin-inte&middot;&middot;&middot;ity.html</A> ) )  can someone point me in the right direction?<br><br>I need full, transparent access to the customer's entire class C network, i.e. 192.168.1.x, with the ability to do ICMP pings & pass through all other protocols "as if" I am on their physical network.<br><br>Thank you for your suggestions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VPN-device-recommendation-for-an-IT-consultant-27970485</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
