| [H/W] What's Cisco call the replacement for the 3750 series? »www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collate···918.html
Everything the 3750 series should have been, or tried to be during its lifetime?
- 24 or 48port 10/100/1000 interface w/ POE+
- 4x 1G or 2x 10G or 4x 10G uplink module
- integrated wireless controller (.11ac no less!)
- full netflow v9 support (finally!)
- 2G flash / 4G DRAM -- versus 3750X 64F / 128D
My only issues with the information Cisco's given so far :
- claims of 480Gb stack bandwidth... so what's the single chassis bandwidth, or is it still limited to the 32Gb
bus Catalyst's been stuck on.
- no information on buffer size, though if it's descended from 3750-stock, likely 4 or 8MB shared at best.
Anyone have any other information about these puppies, and/or is deploying them?
Regards |
|
 TomS_Git-r-donePremium,MVM
join:2002-07-19
London, UK
kudos:4 | |
|
| reply to HELLFIRE
Ahh, thanks for that TomS_ 
Regards |
|
 tubbynetreminds me of the danse russePremium,MVM
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ
kudos:1 | reply to HELLFIRE
said by HELLFIRE:- full netflow v9 support (finally!)
c3k-x supported fnf using the c3kx-sm-10g for uplinks, rather than the -nm- variant.
this was showcased at live! a few years ago by the catalyst bu.
regards,
q.
--
"...if I in my north room dance naked, grotesquely before my mirror waving my shirt round my head and singing softly to myself..." |
|
sk1939Premium
join:2010-10-23
Washington, DC
kudos:9 | reply to HELLFIRE
Interesting, but it's still an incremental upgrade frankly. |
|
| reply to HELLFIRE
@tubbynet
I forget, did that module do fnf for just the uplinks or for all interfaces on the chassis?
@sk1939
...given the number of features the 3850s merge together, a long overdue one...
Regards |
|
sk1939Premium
join:2010-10-23
Washington, DC
kudos:9 Reviews:
 ·T-Mobile US
| said by HELLFIRE:@tubbynet
I forget, did that module do fnf for just the uplinks or for all interfaces on the chassis?
@sk1939
...given the number of features the 3850s merge together, a long overdue one...
Regards
True, Cisco was behind the ball for a little while now in some markets, it seems like this is an attempt to leap frog the competition. |
|
