<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Short PtP link&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Service Providers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Short-PtP-link-27979775</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:42:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:42:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27986845</link>
<description><![CDATA[bburley posted : Thanks for the info. I know someone who is just setting up some WDS links and we'll have to compare notes. I will likely try it out myself... I will add it to my long list :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27986845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:44:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27984256</link>
<description><![CDATA[jcremin posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726290" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726290');">bburley</a>:</said><p>MPLS was supposed to make the link a bit faster  </p></div>I believe that was true when 802.11n first came out... MT had a problem with poor performance on WDS links, but they fixed that quite awhile ago.  I looked at the Wiki article, and it appears nobody has updated it since then.  When I set up my first few 11n links, I did have to use MPLS, but as soon as regular WDS bridging performance was fixed, I dumped the MPLS stuff since it was much more complicated than the simple WDS setup.  And it does pass mac addresses properly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27984256</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:59:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27983932</link>
<description><![CDATA[LLigetfa posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1726290" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1726290');">bburley</a>:</said><p>I have had funny issues in the past with MAC addresses being translated to the MAC address of the bridge device. I have read that this is normal behavior for an RFC compliant bridge but I didn't want that 'feature'.<br> </p></div>WDS fixes that.<br><small>--<br>Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and formal education positively fortifies it. -- Stephen Vizinczey</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27983932</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:46:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27983630</link>
<description><![CDATA[bburley posted : MPLS was supposed to make the link a bit faster but I didn't actually do any comparisons on that claim. What interested me is the "transparent" part. I have had funny issues in the past with MAC addresses being translated to the MAC address of the bridge device. I have read that this is normal behavior for an RFC compliant bridge but I didn't want that 'feature'. I want to see all of the original MAC addresses left the way they are.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27983630</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:21:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27982757</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : Yea just a WDS link is more than enough for that. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27982757</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:46:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980598</link>
<description><![CDATA[jcremin posted : What is your reasoning for using MPLS vs just a simple WDS bridge?  Seems like a lot of extra complication for no additional gain that I'm aware of.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980598</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:52:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980482</link>
<description><![CDATA[bburley posted : I would recommend using this method.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bridge_two_Networks_using_MPLS" >wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transpare&middot;&middot;&middot;ing_MPLS</A><br><br>I used it on a pair of SXT's and it works well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980482</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:16:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980394</link>
<description><![CDATA[UHF posted : Thanks! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27980394</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:32:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27979993</link>
<description><![CDATA[viperm posted : They should work fine. May have to turn down the power all the way.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Short-PtP-link-27979993</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:55:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Short PtP link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Short-PtP-link-27979775</link>
<description><![CDATA[UHF posted : I have a client that needs to connect two buildings together. They are across the street from each other, a few hundred at most. Currently they are using a couple of Linksys routers with external antennas. It works, mostly, but is slow and needs rebooted a lot.<br><br>Would a pair of RBSEXTANTG-5HnD units work for this application? They simply need a bridged connection between the two LANs. Would they need any other equipment to make the link besides the gigabit switches they already have?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Short-PtP-link-27979775</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:19:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
