 HiVoltPremium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON kudos:17 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| Airport, Extending network I scored a 3rd generation Time Capsule for peanuts, with the intention to use it as a dedicated wifi spot, as I already have a capable router but it sits in the basement due to the modem being there.
So I set it up in bridge mode, it works great this way. Wifi speeds are real good on all my devices, 2.4 and 5ghz alike.
But I'd like to extend the network, so it will reach the back yard with good signal. I thought about the new Airport Express, since it has dual band...
Does it extend both 2.4 and 5ghz networks at the same time?
I know there are performance hits with traditional WDS extenders with other routers, but I seem to recall that Apple's implementation is different that doesn't result in speed loss.
What do you guys think of such a setup? -- F**K THE NHL. Go Blue Jays 2013!!!
|
|
 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 kudos:2 | I do it but with a DB TC and 3 single band AEBSes. Performance is fine. Personally I wouldn't bother with 5GHz.
You can't extend 2 SSIDs but I read that if both bands have the same SSID, it will extend both but I can't confirm that. |
|
 DaemonPremium join:2003-06-29 San Francisco, CA Reviews:
·webpass.net
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to HiVolt This topic comes up now and again.
I recommend reading: »[Network] Airport Express Join vs Extend »Experience w/ 2 AirPort Extreme dual-band to extend network
In my experience, the airports will pick a set frequency and then use that, and only that, to speak to each other. However, clients connected to one of the base stations will be able to connect on either frequency, if the base station supports dual band.
A few annoyances I found: -You can't control the frequency the base stations use to talk to each other unless you disable one of the bands, forcing it to use the other. In my old house, they insisted on linking on the 5GHz band but I found that a human in the way seriously interfered with the signal, so any time anyone was in the hall, half the network would go down. I had to disable 5GHz entirely and it worked better -If you aren't using a base station that supports 2x2 or 3x3 antennae, you'll see a bandwidth crunch as the station can't transmit and receive at the same time. The crunch is worse if the station has to switch frequencies when the client and the other station aren't on the same channel. For that reason, I recommend using exclusively Airport Extreme and Time Capsules, and skip the Airport Express (unless it does simultaneous) dual band now. -If the client is within range of multiple base stations, it will pick the one with the strongest signal, not the one with the shortest path. Most of the time this is good, because, if you are for example out in the yard and get good signal from the repeater and just barely get a signal from the main station, connecting to the main station will result in a lot of packet loss and poor performance. On the other hand, if you are inside the house and get 5 bars from the repeater and 4 bars from the main station, you would get faster bandwidth by just going directly to the main station and avoiding the extra repeat hop. But, it won't work that way and will connect you to the repeater. -That said, Macs appear to connect to the most recently connected base station, even if one with much better signal on the same SSID is available. This means if you get online in the house, put the mac to sleep, go into the back yard and wake it up, it will connect with crappy signal to the main base station until it finally gives up and drops the connection, at which point it will reconnect, this time using the repeater.
Even with the limitations above, Apple's 'Extend this Network' is dramatically better than WDS was. Don't use WDS under any circumstances. -- -Ryan I use Linux, OS X, iOS and Windows. Let the OS wars die. |
|
 joakoPremium join:2000-09-07 /dev/null kudos:5 | reply to HiVolt If there's any way you can run a cable to it I would go with that approach instead. -- PRescott7-2097 |
|
 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 kudos:2 | Newer powerline networking boxes are pretty good. I use a couple and get a more stable connection over 802.11n. |
|
 kitsune join:2001-11-26 Sacramento, CA | reply to HiVolt FYI, the new Airport Expresses are Simultaneous Dual Band. |
|
 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Clear Wireless
| The question isn't if they're simultaneous dual band but rather will they extend both bands of an existing dual band network, or can you only pick one or the other. Do the newest ones allow you to choose 2 SSIDs in the extend a network configuration? |
|
 kitsune join:2001-11-26 Sacramento, CA | reply to HiVolt No, when extending a network you can only extend one SSID. However, if you have not split the network names then just as Daemon was explaining it should extend both frequencies. |
|
 HiVoltPremium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON kudos:17 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to kitsune said by kitsune:FYI, the new Airport Expresses are Simultaneous Dual Band. Yeah, that's the one I'd be interested in getting, refurbished from Apple. -- F**K THE NHL. Go Blue Jays 2013!!!
|
|
 not quite rightI'm not cool enough to be a Mac person join:2001-06-23 Puyallup, WA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Vonage
·Comcast
| reply to joako said by joako:If there's any way you can run a cable to it I would go with that approach instead. x2 ... I have a TC at one end of my house and a 3rd gen APE at the other in this configuration. My Wi-Fi has at least a 1 block radius. -- Not many people know this, but I happen to be quite famous... |
|
 HiVoltPremium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON kudos:17 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to joako said by joako:If there's any way you can run a cable to it I would go with that approach instead. Not really, i only have one ethernet cable running from the basement (where the modem is) to upstairs where the router is. This house is really hard to run wires thru.
The current Time Capsule is on the 2nd floor at the front of the house, and I do get signal in the whole house, but its weak at the other end of the house on the ground floor, and no signal in the back yard. That's why I'm looking at the refurbished Airport Express to put at the other end of the house, to extend the network on that side of the house and have good signal in the back yard.
I think i'll give this setup a shot. I just wish that Apple made the latest generation AE in the same style as before, i liked that plug in the wall design. -- F**K THE NHL. Go Blue Jays 2013!!!
|
|
 DaemonPremium join:2003-06-29 San Francisco, CA Reviews:
·webpass.net
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
| reply to kitsune said by kitsune:No, when extending a network you can only extend one SSID. However, if you have not split the network names then just as Daemon was explaining it should extend both frequencies. Right-- if you set up 2 SSIDs, it will only extend one of them. But, if you keep the same SSID, you'll be able to connect to the remote base stations on both frequencies using that SSID.
However, the network is actually only being extended on one frequency, since the base stations only use one pipe to communicate, limiting it to a single frequency/channel.
For example, you could connect to 'Remote Base Station' on 2.4GHz, but 'Remote Base Station' could be connected to 'Main Base Station' on 5GHz. There is no way to get the remote and main stations to connect to each other on 2.4GHz unless you disable the 5GHz band on the main base station. -- -Ryan I use Linux, OS X, iOS and Windows. Let the OS wars die. |
|
 kitsune join:2001-11-26 Sacramento, CA | reply to HiVolt said by HiVolt:said by joako:If there's any way you can run a cable to it I would go with that approach instead. The current Time Capsule is on the 2nd floor at the front of the house, and I do get signal in the whole house, but its weak at the other end of the house on the ground floor, and no signal in the back yard. That's why I'm looking at the refurbished Airport Express to put at the other end of the house, to extend the network on that side of the house and have good signal in the back yard. You don't want to place the Express at the other end of the house. They act as relays not boosters. So you will want to place somewhere halfway between the Time Capsule and where you are trying to get the signal to. |
|
 Count ZeroObama-Biden 2012Premium join:2007-01-18 Winston Salem, NC | reply to skeechan A great point
I use a Netgear Powerline kit (the "200Mbit Media" version) to bring my ethernet downstairs where I have my Time Capsule setup with the same SSID & password as my Airport Extreme upstairs. The airport extreme does DHCP for my entire network and acts as the router while the Time Capsule just lets me walk around seamlessly with my wifi devices and reduces the performance hit I used to take after going past so many walls and such. Real work performance I get ~9Mbps sustained at max - so a bit under 1/3 of the theoretical max speed but it's acceptable for streaming media still (I stream 1080p content from my server upstairs to an AppleTV 3rd gen downstairs w/ no problem). |
|
|
|
 joakoPremium join:2000-09-07 /dev/null kudos:5 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to kitsune said by kitsune:said by HiVolt:said by joako:If there's any way you can run a cable to it I would go with that approach instead. The current Time Capsule is on the 2nd floor at the front of the house, and I do get signal in the whole house, but its weak at the other end of the house on the ground floor, and no signal in the back yard. That's why I'm looking at the refurbished Airport Express to put at the other end of the house, to extend the network on that side of the house and have good signal in the back yard. You don't want to place the Express at the other end of the house. They act as relays not boosters. So you will want to place somewhere halfway between the Time Capsule and where you are trying to get the signal to. Run a network cable to the express, disable the routing functions. Set the same SSID and security settings but different (or auto) channel. You want to place them as far apart as possible, maybe turn down the power. Instead of repeating the wifi and halving the bandwidth and creating interference. -- PRescott7-2097 |
|
 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 kudos:2 | reply to Count Zero I have the AV500s and close I get about 40Mb, far away about 15Mb. There is supposed to be a successor to the current homeplug generation that will (I guess) significantly improve throughput. |
|
 Count ZeroObama-Biden 2012Premium join:2007-01-18 Winston Salem, NC | Not sure they had those 3yrs ago when I got mine. Either way they're really truly "plug and forget" and they make bringing Ethernet to distant parts of the house easy. It's nice that they have encryption too. |
|
 kitsune join:2001-11-26 Sacramento, CA | reply to joako said by joako:Run a network cable to the express, disable the routing functions. Set the same SSID and security settings but different (or auto) channel. You want to place them as far apart as possible, maybe turn down the power. Instead of repeating the wifi and halving the bandwidth and creating interference. Actually you don't have to worry about it with the new Airport Utility software. Just plug it in and open up AU. It will automatically set it up to extend the network via ethernet. If the cable gets disconnected it will switch to extend wirelessly (if it can). |
|