site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

prairiesky

join:2008-12-08
canada
kudos:2

reply to Jerm

Re: Large download speed increase, but upload is terrible.

Add in that download is much more sellable and needed. If a free channel became available, it's use is more valuable as a download channel than an upload.

brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

said by prairiesky:

Add in that download is much more sellable and needed. If a free channel became available, it's use is more valuable as a download channel than an upload.

The channels don't work like that and there are a lot more people wanting faster upload speeds than there are that want 100+ Mbps download speeds.


Jerm

join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
kudos:2

reply to prairiesky

said by prairiesky:

If a free channel became available, it's use is more valuable as a download channel than an upload.

Upload is generally 5-42Mhz. Downstream is generally 600-700mhz.

You can't just substitute one for the other... cable plants act very differently downstream vs upstream.


motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable

said by Jerm:

said by prairiesky:

If a free channel became available, it's use is more valuable as a download channel than an upload.

Upload is generally 5-42Mhz. Downstream is generally 600-700mhz.

You can't just substitute one for the other... cable plants act very differently downstream vs upstream.

in reality the downstream channels can be placed from 57MHz to 999MHz if the cable company wanted to place them anywhere but they would have to have 1GHz gear to put channels higher than 861MHz. I know in my area the downstream channels are in the 780MHz to 816MHz range right now.

Saturday, 18-May 19:25:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics