http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986551 en Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:16 EDT Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:16 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27990202 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27990202 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:33:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986836
Tracing route to netflash.net [208.90.99.41]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.125.210.1
2 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms 24.156.151.169
3 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms woodstock1.cable.teksavvy.com [24.246.55.78]
4 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms woodstock1.cable.teksavvy.com [24.246.55.73]
5 11 ms 21 ms 11 ms gw-rogers.torontointernetxchange.net [206.108.34
.29]
6 18 ms 24 ms 23 ms 69.63.250.90
7 18 ms 16 ms 18 ms 69.63.252.209
8 14 ms 21 ms 14 ms te-1-9-1.agw05.ktgc.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [6
9.63.252.18]
9 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms www.nowires.ca [69.17.128.26]
10 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms c-74-114-73-44.netflash.net [74.114.73.44]
11 13 ms 14 ms 13 ms c-208-90-99-41.netflash.net [208.90.99.41]

Trace complete.

So far I'm not seeing a reason for the slow speeds. If it's node congestion then TSI should be able to tell me that. So far, the only thing that's happened is a tech visit and all he did was run the direct line thru a splitter (-7dB) and then to the modem.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986836 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:42:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986763 over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.125.210.1
2 13 ms 11 ms * 24.156.151.169
3 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms woodstock1.cable.teksavvy.com [24.246.55.78]
4 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms woodstock1.cable.teksavvy.com [24.246.55.73]
5 79 ms 54 ms 78 ms 2110.ae0.agg01.tor.packetflow.ca [69.196.136.44]

6 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms 206.248.155.237
7 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms 206.248.155.70

Trace complete.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986763 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:11:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986667
The only way for this to get fixed is to wait for enough users that are getting service directly from Rogers to call in and complain and than Rogers will get around to doing a node split.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986667 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:37:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986654 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986654 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:29:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986551 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-Woodstock-cable-27986551 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:53:20 EDT