Jim7 Premium Member join:2003-02-10 |
to ekster
Re: [game] 12 Angry MafiaWhy? |
|
eksterHi there Premium Member join:2010-07-16 Sainte-Anne-De-Bellevue, QC |
ekster
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 11:17 am
For his contribution above? |
|
ChaplainSo It Goes Premium Member join:2002-10-11 USA |
to Jim7
Because I FoS'd him, of course.
We have two things right now. Jim follows people, which led to a successful lynch of Protus as a guilty party. He forgot to follow someone last night. Then we have ekster, who got a tip that Jim is trying to eliminate his competition? What competition? Are we to believe that the Guilty win by eliminating their own people? Or is ekster confirming Jim is Innocent through the tip, as the Guilty would be an Innocent person's competition. It makes little sense. That's why I FoS'd him. |
|
eksterHi there Premium Member join:2010-07-16 Sainte-Anne-De-Bellevue, QC |
ekster
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 11:28 am
FoS me all you want, man... I just want you lynched for the balls!
There is also the possibility that Jim wins by eliminating his own people, but the rest don't. Maybe the others know too much, maybe he just doesn't like them. I don't know what Modem was thinking... but I do not think that the guilty would be considered as 'competition' for someone innocent. |
|
Jim7 Premium Member join:2003-02-10 |
Jim7
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 11:32 am
I think you're reading too much into it. Let's let the jury decide. I don't mind one way or the other. What I want to know is what modem had in mind when he designed this game. |
|
eksterHi there Premium Member join:2010-07-16 Sainte-Anne-De-Bellevue, QC |
ekster
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 11:34 am
Too much amphetamine? |
|
ekster |
to Jim7
But yes, I could be reading too much into it... but what else can I do? It's the only bit of information I have. |
|
Jim7 Premium Member join:2003-02-10 |
to ekster
said by ekster:Too much amphetamine? If that were the case then I probably wouldn't look like Jaba. |
|
Brom Premium Member join:2010-10-26 Pittsburgh, PA |
to ekster
said by ekster:but I do not think that the guilty would be considered as 'competition' for someone innocent. Why not? The first group to have all their members incarcerated loses, how is that not competition? |
|
eksterHi there Premium Member join:2010-07-16 Sainte-Anne-De-Bellevue, QC |
ekster
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 12:26 pm
I guess I just never saw town/innocents as being in competition with mafia/guilty. I always thought of town as surviving and figuring out who the mafia is. |
|
GoggalorPsychonaut Premium Member join:2009-06-09 Your Mind! |
Goggalor
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 12:35 pm
Since we are playing a game with Mindf*cker hosting, would it not be plausible for a defendant to be neutral and only in it to eliminate as many people as he can? Maybe that's what Captain Caveman's tip is about? |
|
Brom Premium Member join:2010-10-26 Pittsburgh, PA |
Brom
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 1:40 pm
I actually don't think that's the case. Modem made it clear in the opening that these were two equally sized teams, so I don't think a neutral person would work. I also didn't think there would be any 'powers' though, so my opinions may not count for much. |
|
GoggalorPsychonaut Premium Member join:2009-06-09 Your Mind! |
Goggalor
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 2:09 pm
said by Brom:I actually don't think that's the case. Modem made it clear in the opening that these were two equally sized teams, so I don't think a neutral person would work. I also didn't think there would be any 'powers' though, so my opinions may not count for much. said by DrModem:If you are confused, just remember this everyone:
If you are town, you are trying to draw out the mafia for the jury
If you are mafia, you are trying to make the jury think you are innocent and paint town players as guilty.
Something else to remember:
There is no PMing at all in this game, so even the mafia members don't know who the other mafia members are, even though there is an even split between the two teams of 5 each. Who knows anything, other than Modem himself, this game? Even the guilty defendants (Mafia) do not know who's who. Maybe there is not a "neutral", but there could very well be some kind of "rising mafioso" who has to take out everyone by cleaning house and setting up his throne on a pile of corpses? Or... Mindf*cker is doing what he does best... FoS: Jim... because ekster is the only one to have brought information up this day about a defendant. |
|
Jim7 Premium Member join:2003-02-10 |
Jim7
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 2:11 pm
^guilty beyond a doubt |
|
TheRulWhy Not You? Premium Member join:2007-09-18 Monterey, CA |
to Goggalor
I will say this. at the beginning, I thought the Mindfraker had all of us defendants innocent. |
|
|
Antonica
Premium Member
2013-Feb-7 2:28 pm
Vote: Ekster
I'm going with Ekster, and probably Gogg next due to them going after Jim. While he could be saccing one of his buddies, the fact that ekster is trying to get Jim voted for just seems like he's scared of being followed next. |
|
JobbieKeep It Simple Premium Member join:2010-08-24 Mexico |
Jobbie
Premium Member
2013-Feb-8 11:50 am
I don't like the lack of investigations from Jim, did he forgot to do it or he did it on purpose |
|
KrisnatharokPC Builder, Gamer Premium Member join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit |
the fuck happened today |
|
JobbieKeep It Simple Premium Member join:2010-08-24 Mexico |
Jobbie
Premium Member
2013-Feb-11 8:54 am
Need more than that from you my friend, read and let us know your thoughts. |
|
Jobbie |
Jobbie
Premium Member
2013-Feb-12 9:13 am
Vote: ekster
Need to keep the game going.
WTB more KrisN |
|
KrisnatharokPC Builder, Gamer Premium Member join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit |
Fine fine. Vote EksterPromise to be involved more tomorrow--I fly back from my little road trip on Thursday, so starting tomorrow night, I promise to come up with and explain my thoughts on this game so far. |
|
DrModemTrust Your Doctor Premium Member join:2006-10-19 USA |
DrModem
Premium Member
2013-Feb-13 6:25 pm
Ekster was a guilty defendant.
Period is now courtroom debate. |
|
TheRulWhy Not You? Premium Member join:2007-09-18 Monterey, CA |
TheRul
Premium Member
2013-Feb-13 6:41 pm
The Innocents are on a comeback! Yea us. |
|
eksterHi there Premium Member join:2010-07-16 Sainte-Anne-De-Bellevue, QC |
to DrModem
I guess that has to mean that Jim is innocent. Oh well. |
|