 | How can i use single Freq. in 4 Canopy AP's in one tower? I am newbie in canopy and i am trying to use a single frequency in my 4 AP's in my tower, but when i do assign the same frequency in to two side by side AP the SM located at the edge of the two AP keeps on disconnecting. i notice the the SNR goes down.
Please help. thanks a lot |
|
 | Canopy allows channel re-use on back-to-back APs, with appropriate timing parameters of course. So it might be difficult to achieve your goal with just one channel....maybe narrow up the beamwidth on your APs? Doing so would cost you coverage area of course. |
|
 | reply to Jafster You can get away with two channels, not one. Are you GPS synced? |
|
 DaDawgsPremium join:2010-08-02 Deltaville, VA | reply to Jafster It is my experience that one AP can service about 50 customers without too much overload.
Do you *REALLY* need 4 APs on that tower?
Canopy will have severe problems if you try to overlap 4 APs on the same channel on the same tower, as would any other technology. It is just a bad idea, period. -- Once we IPv6 enable every device on the Internet we will have toasters, baby monitors, and security cameras joining the bot nets which today are populated only by idiots that can not refrain from clicking, "Yes I would like to see those titties..."
|
|
 1 edit | reply to wirelessdog Yes i have a CMM4 and a GPS, currently i am suing two freq. per tower but i really need to change it into one.
and i have 4 AP's in sa single tower already and we need that setup atleast cover the place. |
|
|
|
 | reply to DaDawgs well i hope i can do that. problem is that we want cover 120 deg. and that is the reason why i/we want to use a single freq.
i hope that there is a way to solve my problem. |
|
 | im sorry what we want is a 360 coverage using 1 freq. |
|
 | said by Jafster:im sorry what we want is a 360 coverage using 1 freq. you will not be able to do that using multiple AP's.
you can do it with a single AP and and omni antenna. |
|
 lutful... of ideasPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to Jafster If you really really want to run 4 separate APs on a single tower ... there is only one reasonable solution to minimize the interference.
Change the polarization of 2 of the APs and their SMs. So opposite APs run same polarization while adjacent APs run opposite polarization.  |
|
 | said by lutful:If you really really want to run 4 separate APs on a single tower ... there is only one reasonable solution to minimize the interference.
Change the polarization of 2 of the APs and their SMs. So opposite APs run same polarization while adjacent APs run opposite polarization.  would that allow him to run the same frequency side by side though? |
|
 | It might work. Or you could switch to connectorized AP's and two 180 degree sector antennas which would probably give you better performance anyway.
Lets take a step back.
Why do you feel the need to use one frequency? Post some screen shots of your spectrum analysis. |
|
 | reply to Chessie Chessie, if we can change the polarization do you think we can use a single frequency for 4 ap's in a tower? |
|
 | reply to wirelessdog wirelessdog we dont have enough freq. we are allowed to use only 3 frequencies but we have 3 Towers so i want to use 1 freq. in each tower. our towers are 1 to 2 mile apart. |
|
 | reply to Jafster If all three towers can see each other, and they are that close, I would just use one of them only and use 4 sectors. That way you can reuse the channels that are back to back. So, the tower uses 2 channels instead of 3. You will have far less trouble with sectors instead of a single omni.
This way, you can use the other two towers for other freqs, if you want. |
|
 | reply to Jafster Three frequencies split between three towers will work fine. You need to make sure everything is properly synced and use frequencies correctly. |
|
 lutful... of ideasPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to Jafster
said by Jafster:we dont have enough freq. we are allowed to use only 3 frequencies but we have 3 Towers... 1 to 2 mile apart.
Your situation is not that bad really. You don't even need any opposite polarity sectors if you used 3 sectors per tower.
If you must have 4 sectors per tower, have a look at above sketch for some ideas on how to orient the sectors to minimize interference from same frequency AP on another tower. |
|
 | Apples and oranges. We are dealing with Canopy in this application. Throw everything you know about 802.11 out - it doesn't apply.
The diagram, while it is helpful on a non-canopy setup, really doesn't apply to the OP's situation. |
|
 jcremin join:2009-12-22 Siren, WI kudos:2 | said by wirelessdog:The diagram, while it is helpful on a non-canopy setup, really doesn't apply to the OP's situation. Please explain further... I've never used Canopy myself, but it seems a layout like the diagram shows is simply efficient use of spectrum regardless of the technology used. I would assume anytime you can avoid having towers blasting each other on the same channels is good practice, GPS sync or not, although I am aware that the GPS sync makes it much less critical than 802.11.... |
|
 | reply to Jafster Canopy GPS sync allows one to reuse the same frequency twice on each tower. That would be 2 frequencies per tower for the OP. The OP has a total of three frequencies available. The frequencies can be reused on each tower as long as the AP's are not facing each other. Heck, the AP's can truthfully probably be facing each other without any service issues. This is why competing Canopy WISP's can live in each other's territory so efficiently as long as the coordinate things like dl%, control slots and range.
This is how we can run six 60 degree 900mhz sectors per tower with only three non-overlapping frequencies. It is also how channels can be used over and over and over again.
To the OP: The question still hasn't be answered if your towers are correctly GPS sync'ed. Based on your questions I would guess not so I would suggest a starting point of posting a simple diagram of your network along with your dl%, control slots, and range/distance settings per tower and exactly how you do GPS sync per tower. |
|
 lutful... of ideasPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | reply to wirelessdog said by wirelessdog:Apples and oranges. We are dealing with Canopy in this application. Throw everything you know about 802.11 out - it doesn't apply. I do understand how Canopy (gps) sync actually works and the gotchas. The sum of the received power from other sectors may swamp an AP because SMs also transmit at the same time. 
P.S. I recall you participated in this 2010 Canopy thread. »Argh! What is doing this?! |
|