 | Can somone out east ping these IP's for me I'm gonna set up a game server and need some ping numbers from people out east to these IP's. Just want to see which server to choose. If you could state your location that would be great.
Denver (InterNAP) 72.5.102.10 (75ms for me - Vancouver area) Seattle (InterNAP) 66.150.164.26 (48 ms for me - Vancouver area) |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium join:2006-08-30 HarperLand Reviews:
·Cybersurf Intern..
| quote: Pinging 72.5.102.10 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=52 Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=52 Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=52 Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
quote: Pinging 66.150.164.26 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=117 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=117 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=117 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=117
-- No, I didn't. Honest... I ran out of gas. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake....... |
|
 | reply to analog andy From Mississauga, 10 Mbit ADSL2+ connection...
PING 75.5.102.10 (75.5.102.10) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 75.5.102.10 ping statistics --- 40 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 39006ms
PING 66.150.164.26 (66.150.164.26) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_req=1 ttl=120 time=76.0 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_req=2 ttl=120 time=76.7 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_req=3 ttl=120 time=76.5 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_req=4 ttl=120 time=77.1 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_req=5 ttl=120 time=76.8 ms ^C --- 66.150.164.26 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 76.094/76.662/77.154/0.465 ms |
|
 | reply to analog andy From a server on 100Mbit connection located in Montreal: # ping 72.5.102.10 PING 72.5.102.10 (72.5.102.10) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=69.9 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=70.0 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=69.4 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=69.5 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=69.6 ms ^C --- 72.5.102.10 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4530ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.476/69.719/70.002/0.407 ms
# ping 66.150.164.26 PING 66.150.164.26 (66.150.164.26) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=82.6 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=82.5 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=118 time=82.8 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=118 time=83.0 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=5 ttl=118 time=86.8 ms ^C --- 66.150.164.26 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4421ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.593/83.601/86.859/1.676 ms |
|
 | reply to analog andy Thanks
Denver it is, should give everyone East and West equal ping. |
|
 J E F FWhatta Ya Think About Dat?Premium join:2004-04-01 Kitchener, ON kudos:1 Reviews:
·Rogers Portable ..
·WIND Mobile
·Rogers Hi-Speed
·magicjack.com
| Denver:
PING 72.5.102.10 (72.5.102.10): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=77.839 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=74.558 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=76.285 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=74.598 ms 64 bytes from 72.5.102.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=74.607 ms
Seattle:
PING 66.150.164.26 (66.150.164.26): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=113 time=98.704 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=101.036 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=113 time=99.933 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=113 time=105.105 ms 64 bytes from 66.150.164.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=113 time=101.910 ms -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
 Tig join:2006-06-29 Carrying Place, ON Reviews:
·voip.ms
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to analog andy From a rural DSL drop in the Trenton, Ontario area.
Pinging 72.5.102.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51 Request timed out. Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=51 Reply from 72.5.102.10: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 72.5.102.10: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 63ms, Average = 62ms
Pinging 66.150.164.26 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=120 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=120 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=120 Reply from 66.150.164.26: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=120
Ping statistics for 66.150.164.26: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% los Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 74ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 74ms |
|
 | Thanks
For those wondering what game. I set up a server for Xonotic www.xonotic.org. Server name Freakzilla in the server list 
LOL although my son will be PISSED off once I tell him I set up a server as his laptop is taken away for a week. Muahaha |
|
 AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | reply to analog andy From Nova Scotia Denver Server, TTL 51 avg Time 62ms Seatle TTL 116, avt Time 91ms |
|
 | said by Anav:From Nova Scotia Denver Server, TTL 51 avg Time 62ms Seatle TTL 116, avt Time 91ms That's not bad. Seems the game adds overhead so the ping on the game list is 100-115ms sometimes down to 94. |
|
 jtl999ELE Programmer join:2012-11-24 | reply to analog andy What did your son do? |
|
 | Didn't clean his room or clean up the garbage outside from the Raccon garbage bin rape when he was told to. |
|
 jtl999ELE Programmer join:2012-11-24 | My parents did not give me those duties and let me play games and code all day. |
|
 IanPremium join:2002-06-18 ON kudos:1 Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| reply to analog andy From Brampton. Rogers cable.
--- 72.5.102.10 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.484/62.857/67.151/1.934 ms
--- 66.150.164.26 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 90.305/102.073/185.517/27.858 ms -- Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot. Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency. David Wong |
|