dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
20

hm blah
@videotron.ca

hm blah to resa1983

Anon

to resa1983

Re: New Canadian Bittorrent lawsuit: Who shared "Recoil&quo

:/
It's not fair. They nail my IP as downloading some goat porn w/ clothes on, you get an action movie, and the guy above some yodeler.


Is anyone going to be in Montreal tomorrow to see this go down?

Will anyone tweet what's going on?

D_Puckett, can you get anyone there to transcribe this as it goes down?

Someone Email JF to get over there?

FiReSTaRT
Premium Member
join:2010-02-26
Canada

FiReSTaRT

Premium Member

quote:
Your IP is clear
This is only demo for random IP from our database
Lol
MaynardKrebs
We did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee.
Premium Member
join:2009-06-17

MaynardKrebs to hm blah

Premium Member

to hm blah
said by hm blah :

:/
It's not fair. They nail my IP as downloading some goat porn w/ clothes on, you get an action movie, and the guy above some yodeler.


Is anyone going to be in Montreal tomorrow to see this go down?

Will anyone tweet what's going on?

D_Puckett, can you get anyone there to transcribe this as it goes down?

Someone Email JF to get over there?

JF is going to be in Hottawa tomorrow AFAIK
Cdnmoose
join:2010-08-24
St John'S, NL

Cdnmoose

Member

Thanks for the link to ScanEye, It says I am downloading or downloaded

1 Fast and Furious 5 Fast Five (2011) DVDRip XviD-MAXSPEED SHOW PIRACY STATS 2012-02-18 22:34:17 1
2 Man.on.a.Ledge.2012.R5.CAM.AUDiO.XviD-BiDA SHOW PIRACY STATS 2012-04-27 04:37:06 1
3 One Day[2011]BRRip XviD-ExtraTorrentRG SHOW PIRACY STATS 2012-02-19 00:00:00 2

What a bowl of crap. I have 2 ISPs, and am getting rid of one on Friday so I jumped on that one to check...lol and the one I am staying with says there is nothing!!
Expand your moderator at work

A Lurker
that's Ms Lurker btw
Premium Member
join:2007-10-27
Wellington N

A Lurker to FiReSTaRT

Premium Member

to FiReSTaRT

Re: New Canadian Bittorrent lawsuit: Who shared "Recoil&quo

quote:
Your IP is clear
This is only demo for random IP from our database
Me too
D_Puckett
Premium Member
join:2013-02-09
Etobicoke, ON

D_Puckett to hm blah

Premium Member

to hm blah
said by hm blah :

:/
.. Is anyone going to be in Montreal tomorrow to see this go down?
Will anyone tweet what's going on?
D_Puckett, can you get anyone there to transcribe this as it goes down?
..

Unfortunately the process is rather anti-climactic. NGN and Riding's counsel notified our counsel that they wish an indeterminate adjournment while they wait to see what happens in the CIPPIC Intervenor motion in the Voltage TS motion. We are not in a position to oppose an adjournment as it is their motion.

For the armchair lawyers out there.. we could try and oppose but we would have a tough time trying to show how our customer's privacy would be harmed by NGN retreating from the table.

So, while if it were proceeding tomorrow AM I was planning on being there, it won't so I won't.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

said by D_Puckett:

Unfortunately the process is rather anti-climactic. NGN and Riding's counsel notified our counsel that they wish an indeterminate adjournment while they wait to see what happens in the CIPPIC Intervenor motion in the Voltage TS motion. We are not in a position to oppose an adjournment as it is their motion.

For the armchair lawyers out there.. we could try and oppose but we would have a tough time trying to show how our customer's privacy would be harmed by NGN retreating from the table.

So, while if it were proceeding tomorrow AM I was planning on being there, it won't so I won't.

Makes sense.

Thanks for keeping us in the loop.
hm

hm

Anon

Distributel’s Motion record, Lots more detail:

»www.scribd.com/doc/12482 ··· -Limited
hm

hm to D_Puckett

Anon

to D_Puckett
said by D_Puckett:

Unfortunately the process is rather anti-climactic. NGN and Riding's counsel notified our counsel that they wish an indeterminate adjournment while they wait to see what happens in the CIPPIC Intervenor motion in the Voltage TS motion. We are not in a position to oppose an adjournment as it is their motion.

For the armchair lawyers out there.. we could try and oppose but we would have a tough time trying to show how our customer's privacy would be harmed by NGN retreating from the table.

So, while if it were proceeding tomorrow AM I was planning on being there, it won't so I won't.

Daniel,

Howard Knopf (copyright lawyer) wrote up on the position you are taking. I dropped this URL to him about NGN putting this on hold in his comment area. Refer to the comments in his Distributel blog post:
»excesscopyright.blogspot ··· isp.html

I'm not 100% sure I follow, but I think he stated you should press ahead. Anyhow he (we) have no way of knowing if you really are who you claim to be. So I'll let you contact him, or not, to set the record straight since the docket isn't updated with this latest info.

Lot's of people support your position.
D_Puckett
Premium Member
join:2013-02-09
Etobicoke, ON

D_Puckett

Premium Member

said by hm :

Howard Knopf (copyright lawyer) wrote up on the position you are taking. I dropped this URL to him about NGN putting this on hold in his comment area. Refer to the comments in his Distributel blog post:
»excesscopyright.blogspot ··· isp.html

I'm not 100% sure I follow, but I think he stated you should press ahead. Anyhow he (we) have no way of knowing if you really are who you claim to be. So I'll let you contact him, or not, to set the record straight since the docket isn't updated with this latest info.

Lot's of people support your position.

Yes, I just read your post as well as HK's. As for who I am, I could not fit Daniel Puckett in as a user name, so I opted for D Puckett. I will post a reply to HK after I have had a coffee or two. I may need to discuss with our counsel first, as lawyers get cranky if/when their clients get too involved in legal discussions without their blessings

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

said by D_Puckett:

I may need to discuss with our counsel first, as lawyers get cranky if/when their clients get too involved in legal discussions without their blessings

lol yeah that was the first thing I thought as well.