<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!&#x27; in forum &#x27;Verizon Fiber Optics&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003014</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:44:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:44:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008870</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dream Killer posted : If the router has the UPNP flaw, just explicitly block UDP Port 1900 and TCP Port 5000 through the firewall.<br><br>For FiOS MI424wr:<br><br>Go to Firewall Settings on the top bar then to "Advanced filtering". On the "Inbound" area (the top table), click "Add" to the right of Broadband Connection. It's either Ethernet or Coax, choose whichever your <i>internet</i> is hooked up to.<br><br>Click the drop down "Protocol", and pick on "User Defined". Add server ports, "protocol" is UDP, "source" is "Any" and destination is single range port 1500. Click apply and repeat the previous step for TCP 5000. Name the service something, I call it "Upnp-flaw", then click apply.<br><br>It should bring you back to the "Add Advanced Filter" page. Make sure operation is "Drop Packets" then click Apply. Your page should now look like this:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>Just to demonstrate that it works, I enabled logging for the rule and ran the test again at GRC. Here's what I got after two passed tests:<br><br>[att=2]<br><br>I looked up who that packet belonged to and it did originate from the GRC test:<br><br>[att=3]<br><br>This rule should be added if you use UPnP. It will only drop the packets coming in from the WAN side and will have no effects on the normal use of UPnP.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/28008870?c=2074539&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyODAwMzAxNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="186306 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=489 SRC="/r0/download/2074539.thumb600~3c66f22a294ba90e71a535023b1b355e/fw rule2.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>UPNP Filter</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/28008870?c=2074540&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyODAwMzAxNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="193381 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=489 SRC="/r0/download/2074540.thumb600~9305d2c337d669b9074d83c51cd4bfd6/it works.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>It works!</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/28008870?c=2074541&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyODAwMzAxNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="215088 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=489 SRC="/r0/download/2074541.thumb600~302b3a08b9737861c3ea6f98d11ca65a/owner.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Blocked packet belongs to GRC.</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008870</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:43:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008845</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikev posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/449678" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=449678');">birdfeedr</a>:</said><p>Does FiOS MDU ONTs using VDSL do this? Maybe.<br> </p></div>Nope. I'm on one... My router has its own public WAN address. Also, I don't use PPPoE... My modem provides an ethernet connection that the router plugs into. The router just uses DHCP to get its IP address, no PPPoE.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:33:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008733</link>
<description><![CDATA[guppy_fish posted : I click the link in the OP's post  :uhh:<br><br>Just did the other one, had to find via the menu the other test, to find ... its no issue ...<br><br>As I said, this is a security forum topic, nothing to do with FIOS]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008733</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:59:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008695</link>
<description><![CDATA[knarf829 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/449678" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=449678');">birdfeedr</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/911142" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=911142');">guppy_fish</a>:</said><p>Also that page doesn't work right, it reports my router at IP 10.1.1.1 is responding to UPNP ... lol ( is a non routeable IP and can't be accessed from the WAN )<br>The details say I'm on a linux server that is at 192.168.0.1 , nothing in my network uses that IP<br> </p></div>Did you click this link, which is an example of exposed UPnP vulnerability result? &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm" >www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm</A><br><br>or did you click this link, then click Services/ShieldsUP!, then run the UPnP test? &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/intro.htm" >www.grc.com/intro.htm</A> </p></div> ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008695</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:48:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008553</link>
<description><![CDATA[birdfeedr posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/911142" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=911142');">guppy_fish</a>:</said><p>Also that page doesn't work right, it reports my router at IP 10.1.1.1 is responding to UPNP ... lol ( is a non routeable IP and can't be accessed from the WAN )<br>The details say I'm on a linux server that is at 192.168.0.1 , nothing in my network uses that IP<br> </p></div>Did you click this link, which is an example of exposed UPnP vulnerability result? &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm" >www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm</A><br><br>or did you click this link, then click Services/ShieldsUP!, then run the UPnP test? &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/intro.htm" >www.grc.com/intro.htm</A><br><br>The first link displays example results exactly like you reported. Use the second link. Your Actiontec primary router will not show the vulnerability. DD-WRT on my Asus doesn't either. <br><br>Also, some broadband system routers using PPPoE present non-routable WAN addresses because they are aggregated further upstream (if I'm using the correct terminology). Does FiOS MDU ONTs using VDSL do this? Maybe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008553</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:09:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008188</link>
<description><![CDATA[nyrrule27 posted : "Verizon is aware of a recently-announced vulnerability that may potentially affect certain versions of the Universal Plug-and-Play software on a variety of devices such as Home Routers, Modems, and Gateways that use this feature.<br><br> <br><br>Verizon investigated a wide range of equipment, which covers the vast majority of our FiOS and DSL customers.  None of the devices investigated were identified as being vulnerable.  Verizon will continue its investigation to ensure all potentially vulnerable devices are identified. <br><br> <br><br>Additional customer information is available to the customer at www.verizon.com/virushelp.  Verizon will update this website with additional information as it becomes available."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008188</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:57:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008100</link>
<description><![CDATA[Zifnab posted : Verizon is saying that they've tested 'the majority' of their customer CPE and none of them have this flaw. Not sure what constitutes majority, but I know at least the Actiontecs and Westells are unaffected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28008100</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:21:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006920</link>
<description><![CDATA[knarf829 posted : This has nothing to do with the LAN UPnP setting in the router. It's a bug, not a setting, that opens WAN UPnP to the outside world in some routers.<br><br>(EDIT TO CORRECT: Yes, turning LAN UPnP off will apparently disable the WAN bug if you have it - didn't mean to leave the impression it wouldn't)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006920</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:08:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006903</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikev posted : I ran this test last night with UPnP both off and on... both times it said I was not vulnerable, so it seems that the Rev I router with the latest firmware has UPnP set up properly, with no visibility on the WAN side.<br><br>For the record, I leave UPnP off anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006903</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:04:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006902</link>
<description><![CDATA[knarf829 posted : Yeah - what does Steve Gibson know about Internet security anyway?<br><br>As this is specifically about FiOS routers, it seems appropriate here.  The flaw is router specific.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006902</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:04:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006855</link>
<description><![CDATA[guppy_fish posted : This post belongs in the security forums not FIOS<br><br>Also that page doesn't work right, it reports my router at IP 10.1.1.1 is responding to UPNP ... lol ( is a non routeable IP and can't be accessed from the WAN )<br><br>The details say I'm on a linux server that is at 192.168.0.1 , nothing in my network uses that IP<br><br>Complete waste of a test]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006855</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:54:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006851</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gary A posted : UPnP is turned off on my Actiontec, so I got the same "did not respond" result.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28006851</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:53:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003150</link>
<description><![CDATA[jcondon8 posted : I got the same response on my Actiontech mi424wr Rev F.  Assume the same firmware as you but I am not home to check.<br><br>There is also the WPS exploit.  Which the Actiontech's don't support either (so no worries there).  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-335.txt" >www.grc.com/sn/sn-335.txt</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003150</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:49:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003035</link>
<description><![CDATA[knarf829 posted : MI-424WR Rev F. w/ Firmware 20.19.8<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/28003035?c=2074163&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyODAwMzAxNC54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="7598 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=558 HEIGHT=157 SRC="/r0/download/2074163~c7da2202001ef3739c67954b4c9dbb31/Capture.PNG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003035</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:23:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Common Router Security Flaw - You Want to Check This!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003014</link>
<description><![CDATA[smrtech posted : I don't use the M1424WR for my FIOS, but you may want<br>to check this quick test to see if you are exposing your<br>network to a common UPnP implementation bug that<br>is incredibly common.<br><br>The bug is that UPnP is unnecessarily exposed on the WAN<br>side of the router, when it only really makes sense on the<br>LAN side.  Hopefully the Actiontec doesn't have this issue,<br>but curious as many routers have this flaw.  It should never<br>be available for negotiate on the WAN side, but it is on<br>many routers.   Hope this isn't an issue with the ActionTec,<br>but if it is on any model, please report!  Verizon will want<br>to know that.  Hopefully not...<br><br>Here are the details about it:<br><br>There is an entire TechGuy Podcast about it would explains<br>the flaw.  But a quick explaination can be found here:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm" >www.grc.com/su/UPnP-Exposed.htm</A><br><br>Steve Gibson, Security expert wrote this quick test.<br><br>Quick Test:<br><br>Click ShieldsUp!, then scroll down to "UPnP Exposure Test!"<br>and then "Proceed" and you want to run the UPnP Exposure Test<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/intro.htm" >www.grc.com/intro.htm</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Common-Router-Security-Flaw-You-Want-to-Check-This-28003014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:14:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
