dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
15
LastDon
join:2002-08-13

LastDon

Member

Re: bell tech part #2 this getting annoying.....

Click for full size
Update:

Bell Tech came... I explained to him how the dry loop pair they used used to cause extreme headaches for me.

He listened to me and swapped the two lines

Thus far it seems good!

SNR went up
Attenuation went Down (maybe I am closer with this pair)


diskace
Retired
Premium Member
join:2002-02-21

diskace

Premium Member

w00t w00t

It's not because attenuation goes from 21 to 15 that you are closer, could be just a better service pair.
morisato
join:2008-03-16
Oshawa, ON

morisato

Member

Yes your other pair was very Dirty this new pair is more what i would expect for someone 400 feet from the Slam P:) congratz! enjoy
LastDon
join:2002-08-13

LastDon

Member

So I am pining and testing around with Ebox 15Mbps to my 6Mbps connection..

with Ebox my pings seem a lot higher ..
Ebox Below
C:\ping 8.8.8.8
 
Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=54
 
Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 47ms
 
C:\>ping yahoo.com
 
Pinging yahoo.com [206.190.36.45] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=47
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=47
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=46
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47
 
Ping statistics for 206.190.36.45:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 150ms, Average = 129ms
 

my 6Mbps ody profile
C:\ping 8.8.8.8
 
Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=54
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=54
 
Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 25ms
 
C:\>ping yahoo.com
 
Pinging yahoo.com [206.190.36.45] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=47
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=47
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=47
Reply from 206.190.36.45: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=47
 
Ping statistics for 206.190.36.45:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 68ms, Average = 61ms
 
 

Wouldn't a 15Mbps have better pings?
I did more and some had about 30-50ms between them.. on speedtest.net the only server was the ebox server that scored 25, the rest were in the high 50-100ms

these look like the interleave profile that bell put me on for an hour when setting this up!!
morisato
join:2008-03-16
Oshawa, ON

morisato

Member

Well remember ebox is out of Montreal, so your going to have added ping from that my average ping is 26 ms on 15/1 thats on pingtest.net and i have 2ms Jitter get a good grade overall. try your tests on pingtest.net You appear to be on Fastpath now as there is No Delay/msec for the interleave etc..
When i ping the address's you provide my pings are the same ballpark. and i am in the gta on ebox.