dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
65
share rss forum feed


Perma

join:2011-12-20
reply to Perma

Re: CIPPIC has been granted Intervenor Status

How significant is this?

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
said by Perma:

How significant is this?

Very.

They have full intervenor status. CIPPIC got partial intervenor status in the BMG case.

As InvalidError said, this is going to cost Voltage a lot more money, and frankly, it's looking like Voltage won't get subscriber info.

Voltage has 2 options:
1. Pay off Teksavvy's costs, and run.
2. Go to the evidence hearing, and with the lack of good solid evidence, get it (and all of Canipre's evidence), thrown out.

If this case goes to evidence, and the evidence gets tossed, Distributel's case is going to get tossed as well.

--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

JMJimmy

join:2008-07-23
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
said by resa1983:

said by Perma:

How significant is this?

Very.

They have full intervenor status. CIPPIC got partial intervenor status in the BMG case.

As InvalidError said, this is going to cost Voltage a lot more money, and frankly, it's looking like Voltage won't get subscriber info.

Voltage has 2 options:
1. Pay off Teksavvy's costs, and run.
2. Go to the evidence hearing, and with the lack of good solid evidence, get it (and all of Canipre's evidence), thrown out.

If this case goes to evidence, and the evidence gets tossed, Distributel's case is going to get tossed as well.

2) Add pay TSI's costs, CIPPICs costs, and run the risk of a bona fide defense being that much stronger next time they poke their heads out.

They're really between a rock and a hard place legally.

The Distributel case won't get tossed if Voltage turns tail and runs though... in that case Distributel will have to fight but they can use all the arguments that were to be presented by CIPPIC.


hm

@videotron.ca
reply to Perma
said by Perma:

How significant is this?

Very.
They took a gamble.
They got lucky.
It will pay off.
Rejoice.
Break out the wine.
Sing, dance and...

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
reply to JMJimmy
said by JMJimmy:

said by resa1983:

said by Perma:

How significant is this?

Very.

They have full intervenor status. CIPPIC got partial intervenor status in the BMG case.

As InvalidError said, this is going to cost Voltage a lot more money, and frankly, it's looking like Voltage won't get subscriber info.

Voltage has 2 options:
1. Pay off Teksavvy's costs, and run.
2. Go to the evidence hearing, and with the lack of good solid evidence, get it (and all of Canipre's evidence), thrown out.

If this case goes to evidence, and the evidence gets tossed, Distributel's case is going to get tossed as well.

2) Add pay TSI's costs, CIPPICs costs, and run the risk of a bona fide defense being that much stronger next time they poke their heads out.

They're really between a rock and a hard place legally.

The Distributel case won't get tossed if Voltage turns tail and runs though... in that case Distributel will have to fight but they can use all the arguments that were to be presented by CIPPIC.

No, Distributel's case won't get tossed if Voltage runs. It will get tossed if Voltage sticks around, gets their evidence tossed, and loses.

Both companies used Canipre, and Barry Logan.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP


TwiztedZero
Nine Zero Burp Nine Six
Premium
join:2011-03-31
Toronto, ON
kudos:5
w00t!!!! thats great news \o/

JMJimmy

join:2008-07-23
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:

No, Distributel's case won't get tossed if Voltage runs.

I thought that's what I said...


hm

@videotron.ca
reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:

said by Perma:

How significant is this?

Very.

They have full intervenor status. CIPPIC got partial intervenor status in the BMG case.

Do they? I don't see that stated there.

CONSIDERING that the record before me justifies the intervention of CIPPIC on the Plaintiff's discovery motion, but at this time, on no other aspect of the Plaintiffs action against the Defendants, ...


TSI Marc
Premium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:28

1 recommendation

said by hm :

Do they? I don't see that stated there.

yes. they do. page three at bottom.. 1 - a & b.
--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy


hm

@videotron.ca
said by TSI Marc:

said by hm :

Do they? I don't see that stated there.

yes. they do. page three at bottom.. 1 - a & b.

ty for clarifying.