dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
24

hm
@videotron.ca

hm to hm

Anon

to hm

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).

»www.michaelgeist.ca/cont ··· 784/125/

Coincidence? I think not.
Dunlop
join:2011-07-13

Dunlop

Member

said by hm :

It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).

»www.michaelgeist.ca/cont ··· 784/125/

Coincidence? I think not.

wow lol

AkFubar
Admittedly, A Teksavvy Fan
join:2005-02-28
Toronto CAN.

AkFubar to hm

Member

to hm
said by hm :

It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).

»www.michaelgeist.ca/cont ··· 784/125/

Coincidence? I think not.

That goes to show it is not about protecting copyrights but all about the money. It should be noted that they have not been very successful recently in recovering the big $ they seek in US courts either.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

An Aussie economist put out a paper a couple of years ago showing that it's only a money funnel system to the USA.
hm

hm

Anon

So What's going to happen now?

Does CIPPIC have to draft and submit what it plans to examine?

Or do they wait for a judge to pick it up and it hit court right away?

What is to happen now?
When?

Any other info besides this latest news?