site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
14738
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·AT&T Direct ·UVerse Map ·Group Test Results ·Check Availability ·Phone #s
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 ... 6 · 7 · 8
AuthorAll Replies


Dennis
Premium,Mod
join:2001-01-26
Algonquin, IL
kudos:5
Host:
Chicago
Users find Hot Deals
Users find Hot Dea..
Requests for Hot D..
Home Improvement

reply to mattw13

Re: Youtube sucks for me

said by mattw13:

Also, it could still be AT&T's problem: sometimes ISPs cache videos locally to speed up streaming.

AT&T does not cache youtube, that's been said before. This is not an AT&T problem.
--
My Blog. Because I desperately need the acknowledgement of others.

The Judd Family site!


JDThird

@sbcglobal.net

reply to Dennis
I just changed from Roadrunner to Uverse less than a month ago. I had instant problems with streaming videos embedded in any website - youtube, geeksaresexy.net, whatever. Found out in my case it was because I already had a complex network at home before AT&T, so when they came in I didn't want to change my 10.x.x.x address range (since I do a lot of VPN work to clients I don't want overlapping IP's) and kept myself behind my firewall, which was behind their device. Even with the "firewall behind a firewall" setting that the tech enabled when he installed, it was a problem for streaming. I tested by turning on the AT&T wireless I had him keep disabled, and my Macbook pro suddenly could stream what it couldn't when behind the double NAT. I had to bite the bullet and change my network scheme to an "acceptable" one from AT&T since the uverse device doesn't allow the private 10. range on the LAN port. But once I put everything behind the AT&T device and not behind my own firewall as well, my problem went away. Certainly not the case for everyone's problem, but if anyone out there has a double NAT for outbound like I did, worth checking out in case it's impacting you... now if I could just get the Uverse internet to not drop a signal randomly during large file downloads... I lose internet AND tv signal every 10 or so minutes for 30 seconds or so when I'm downloading a large file...

Just glad I'm still in the trial portion since if this doesn't get resolved I can at least cancel Uverse without any penalty...


mattw13

join:2013-02-20
united state

reply to TestBoy

said by TestBoy:

Here is my chart from the youtube speed test.
As it probably is for most of you.. it's erratic up until I blackholed those IP ranges.... then it's gangbusters....

This is clearly not an issue with AT&T or UVerse... but Google.
I can stream 1080p videos in the evening/morning/afternoon.... anytime of the day really without issues..

There is a downside to blackholing these IP ranges.....
- Google TV can no longer play Youtube videos.
- Mobile devices can not play Youtube videos...

On an iPhone it just says "playback error" and on Android devices it says "connection to server lost touch to retry"

If you like watching Youtube videos you are restricting yourself to a computer.
I think this needs more press so that Google will feel some heat and fix this.

Really? I can play mobile videos just fine after blocking a IP address (only blocked one address) (address found using NSLookup on a URL found through using Fiddler)

Also, it could still be AT&T's problem: sometimes ISPs cache videos locally to speed up streaming.

TestBoy

join:2009-10-13
Irmo, SC

reply to HelpPlz

Here is my chart from the youtube speed test.
As it probably is for most of you.. it's erratic up until I blackholed those IP ranges.... then it's gangbusters....

This is clearly not an issue with AT&T or UVerse... but Google.
I can stream 1080p videos in the evening/morning/afternoon.... anytime of the day really without issues..

There is a downside to blackholing these IP ranges.....
- Google TV can no longer play Youtube videos.
- Mobile devices can not play Youtube videos...

On an iPhone it just says "playback error" and on Android devices it says "connection to server lost touch to retry"

If you like watching Youtube videos you are restricting yourself to a computer.
I think this needs more press so that Google will feel some heat and fix this.

Boiledpeanut

join:2013-03-03
Columbia, SC

reply to HelpPlz
Works fine on our Verizon 3G signal, but nothing from our uverse but a spinning wheel. I feel like it started for us a week ago. Cannot provide data for y'all because I don't know a lot about tech stuff, but I did run speed test and it said 15mb. In SC.



David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:78
Reviews:
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·magicjack.com
·Google Voice
·AT&T Southwest

reply to HelpPlz

For Nintendo Wii owners

After blocking those IP's see if you can watch a video with the youtube channel?

I was barely able to watch a video before, now I just get an error about trying again later.

I have a hunch that if I go and unblock those IP's/URL's my youtube channel on the Wii will mysteriously work.

Which if I understand this correctly, this will mean that as least some of those url's were for integrated equipment (tv's, xbox, wii, ps3, samsung tv's, etc...)
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!

mattw13

join:2013-02-20
united state

reply to HelpPlz

Re: Youtube sucks for me

Doing an NSLookup on the YouTube addresses found through a Fiddler capture and blocking the relevant IPs fixed the "throttling" issue for me.


Dennis
Premium,Mod
join:2001-01-26
Algonquin, IL
kudos:5

reply to Jester236
If blocking those IP's has a positive impact on performance than that means DNS is not a factor. Most likely you are just now bypassing over-saturated links.


Jester236

join:2013-02-26

reply to TestBoy
I have the exact same DNS as you do, permanetly set via my gateway. Looks like this could be a factor in all this. Blocking those IP's does seem to still be working for me so i'm starting to get a little more confident about it.


TestBoy

join:2009-10-13
Irmo, SC

reply to Frodo
My DNS servers are also 68.94.156.1 and 157.1
I have played around with using other DNS servers and that never made any real difference for me.


profane

join:2010-10-10

1 edit

reply to HelpPlz

Ok so, I download that Fiddler app and ran it while testing both slow and fast loading videos from youtube.

The first one is from the video that take ages to load/buffer and the second line is from the one that actually works. Notice the word "Throttle" in first line.

http://r15---sn-q4f7dnez.c.youtube.com/videoplayback?algorithm=throttle-factor&burst=40
http://r4---sn-q4f7dnel.c.youtube.com/videoplayback?
 

Btw, these were directly copied from within Fiddler and are originally MUCH longer. If you need or want the rest, let me know.

Oh and I'm on U-verse 24/3

Frodo

join:2006-05-05

reply to NormanS

said by NormanS:

So why does it affect some users, but not others, on the same major ISPs?

I wonder if the DNS servers have something to do with it. It seems that some Uverse customers are on IPv6 servers (so I hear):
99.99.99.53 & 99.99.99.153
I'm on these two:
68.94.156.1 & 68.94.157.1

I hear that Akamai uses DNS to map users to the nearest server. Maybe Youtube does that too. If the DNS server theory was correct, that would explain some users and not others.


cob_
1310nm Of Goodness
Premium
join:2003-07-08
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to Slowin225

said by Slowin225 :

This isn't a U-verse issue-- this is a google YouTube mirror issue. If you can go into your firewall and block the following outbound server IP ranges, all your YouTube buffering should disappear:

BLOCK outbound connections to:
206.111.0.0/16
173.194.54.0/24
173.194.55.0/24
64.214.227.42

That's a good start, but there are several more. The first couple of hosts I have blackholed are 173.194.24.249 and 173.194.57.46 which are outside those networks you listed.
--
"No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority, you can't increase the speed of light."

- RFC 1925

Jester236

join:2013-02-26

1 edit

reply to TestBoy
Well just went back and checked and it seems for some reason when you set up a rule it is set to automatically allow and not block which would obviously expalin why it had no affect haha. Went back and changed that and can confirm that this is working for me at the moment. I can disable and and instantly get crap speeds of 700 - 1200kbps, enable it and two seconds later i'm back to perfect streaming at 11,000kbps.

All that said I won't be convinced this is a perfect fix until I see it working during prime hours over the course of a couple days or a week. It does give me hope though that I can go in and disable or enable the rule and see such instant results. Have my fingers crossed though and hopefully at worst we might just need to add some more IP's to block. I'll be doing daily tests and try to update you, I suggest that anyone else who trys this does the same so we can correlate as much data as possible and finally put this issue to rest.


TestBoy

join:2009-10-13
Irmo, SC

reply to Jester236
I did not, no.
I have a Zywall here at home that I also use for VPN tunnels.
I just created a few objects containing those ranges so it blocks those on all the computers on the network.

Keep in mind when adding these to any firewalls that you have to reject traffic GOING TO any address on those networks, not from those networks.

Edit: typo


Jester236

join:2013-02-26

reply to Jester236
Never mind just saw you said it was your firewall.


Jester236

join:2013-02-26

reply to TestBoy
Hmmm....I tried the same but in Windows firewall and had no luck. Did you drop those in your hosts file?


TestBoy

join:2009-10-13
Irmo, SC

reply to HelpPlz
I dropped....

206.111.0.0/16
173.194.54.0/24
173.194.55.0/24

Into my firewall... and... no more problems.
For the sake of completeness I pulled them and tried to watch the same video and it wouldn't load.


Jester236

join:2013-02-26

reply to TestBoy
So did doing what I said and what others have mentioned in adding the specific servers to the hosts file work for you? Also if you did do that let me know what the typical servers look like that you are automatically pulling from. You're down near Columbia and i'm up in Greenville not too far away so i'm curious to see what role geography may be playing in all this.

On a side note to anyone who may use Fiddler to do what see which addresses to add to the hosts file be aware that Fiddler will make itself a proxy and change your internet settings to reflect this while running as thats how it intercepts the traffic. It will change your settings back when you close it down but while its open you may notice a hit to your overall download speed so keep that in mind when testing. I'm seeing mine peak around 6 -7Mbps with fiddler open and the normal 11-12Mbps when closed.


TestBoy

join:2009-10-13
Irmo, SC

reply to HelpPlz
I started having issues again yesterday continuing into today and decided to try that this evening.
I will be damned if this didn't solve it....

So now the question is.... do we have overloaded servers or ISP manipulation?
I will let some of you higher pay grade folks make that determination.

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 ... 6 · 7 · 8

Wednesday, 22-May 04:54:00 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics