republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
386
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·MS Apps FAQ ·Windows XP FAQ ·Windows 7 FAQ ·Windows Home ·Office Home
AuthorAll Replies

Gem
Premium
join:2005-09-10
kudos:3

Does .net 3.5 replace the need for .net 2.0 and 4.0?

Does Msft .net framework 3.5 replace the need for .net framework 2.0 and 4.0?

That would be great, if so.

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:8

No.

Any given app is written to require a specific version of the .net framework.



QuaffAPint
A Big Thanks To The Troops

join:2001-01-10
Downingtown, PA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Gem
The way it works is 1.x written apps need 1.x framework, similar with 4.x written apps needing 4.x framework.

However, 2.x and 3.5x written apps will work with the 3.5 framework. So if you have an app that calls for the .net 2.x framework, and only have the 3.5 framework installed, the app will still work.

Why they did that one 2/3.5 naming oddity, I don't know.



sekim
Premium,MVM
join:1999-08-17
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:1

reply to Gem

Win8 shows this in the Programs & Features / windows features...

Gem
Premium
join:2005-09-10
kudos:3

Cool. So with net 3.5 we have 2.0 and 3.0 as well, but not 4.0 - correct?

That's good. Two less versions of .net to worry about if space is limited on the OS drive such as small SSDs.


Tuesday, 18-Jun 23:01:20 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics