 RacerbobPremium
join:2001-06-24
Webster, NY | [FireFox] Firefox 19.0 Final It is being released on Tuesday, but it is in the usual place(s) right now.  |
|
| It's not on any of the "release" servers yet;
|
|
 siljalineI'm lovin' that double widePremium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17 | reply to Racerbob
Thanks for the heads-up, Racerbob 
--
Canadians reserve the Right to - Arm Bears |
|
| reply to Racerbob
One of my daily use program refuses to work since Adobe combined the 32/64 bits of Flash player, so I'm left with Flash Player 11.2.202.235.....is there a way to get around the "click to play" or FF 19.0 refusal to accept NON latest version of Flash Player?
Thanks. |
|
RacerbobPremium
join:2001-06-24
Webster, NY | reply to siljaline
You are welcome. Running nice and stable here for me.
»www.downloadcrew.com/article/24333-firefox
and a little write up that was published this morning....
»www.softwarecrew.com/2013/02/bui···0-final/ |
|
|
|
 CCatWe're all quite mad herePremium,MVM
join:2005-12-06
Wonderland
kudos:16 | reply to Racerbob
Just got it via the internal updater this morning. |
|
 gugarciPremium
join:2004-02-25
Lyndhurst, NJ | reply to Racerbob
Just updated. |
|
 mark5019Premium
join:2002-03-30
Atlanta, GA | reply to Racerbob
got it |
|
 LinklistPremium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5 | reply to Racerbob
Updated thru updater. Everything seems to be working. No add-ons were disabled. |
|
 plencnerbPremium
join:2000-09-25
Elgin, IL
kudos:2 | reply to Racerbob
Just downloaded it directly from Mozilla's webpage.
Thanks for the heads up!
--Brian |
|
siljalineI'm lovin' that double widePremium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17
1 edit | reply to Racerbob
No issues to report, here.
Some sites | pages are proving slower to load than expected. • anyone else ? |
|
 jmorlanHmm... That's funny.Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-05
Pacifica, CA
kudos:4 | reply to Racerbob
Thank you. Got via automatic update this morning.
A major change is that the native PDF viewer is now the default. However it renders fonts very poorly on my screen. I had to revert back to Adobe.
--
"It turns out we're very good at not seeing things" - Jack Hitt |
|
siljalineI'm lovin' that double widePremium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17 Reviews:
 ·Bell Sympatico
| reply to Racerbob
More on the new native in-Browser PDF viewer:
»blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/02/19···ruption/
I've reverted to default for now until I have more time to fiddle with it. |
|
 PentangleWith our thoughts we make the world.Premium
join:2006-06-01
Vancouver BC
kudos:2 | reply to Racerbob
Thanks Racerbob . |
|
andyrossPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-04
Schaumburg, IL | reply to siljaline
It does look a bit different. I did a quick test with a datasheet at »www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74hc02.pdf. If you look at the title text at the top right, the built-in PDF is slightly bigger and nearly touching compared to Acrobat XI. |
|
siljalineI'm lovin' that double widePremium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17 Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | Thanks for this. Although I kinda like external view. |
|
RacerbobPremium
join:2001-06-24
Webster, NY | Foxit Reader is the reader of choice here. |
|
siljalineI'm lovin' that double widePremium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17 Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico
| said by Racerbob:Foxit Reader is the reader of choice here.
 |
|
1 edit | reply to Racerbob
Been using the built-in native pdf viewer for months (nightly & aurora builds); there's little need for other PDF viewer.
[edit] also note, saved pdfs can be dragged-dropped on to the viewer for reading! |
|
RacerbobPremium
join:2001-06-24
Webster, NY | said by chachazz:Been using the built-in native pdf viewer for months (nightly & aurora builds); there's little need for other PDF viewer.
Foxit is still my reader of choice. I do not have the Adobe Reader installed in my systems either. Haven't had Adobe in ages. Foxit is like an old friend and I shall stick with it. |
|
