|
jaberi
Member
2013-Feb-24 12:05 am
Ontario surrogate mother slapped with $1,400 hospital billMotherhood used to be simpler. You went to the hospital, in most cases, gave birth and that was it. Is it a boy or girl, does it have all its bits, does dad have the obligatory cigars to hand out? But with the development of reproductive technology a new class of moms is discovering some bottom-line complications that happen not in the delivery room but over in the hospital's finance office. The National Post reports surrogate mothers in Ontario are being billed for hospital services after giving birth even though they have provincial medicare coverage. The reason: The babies were being taken out of the country. » ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/ ··· 508.html» news.nationalpost.com/20 ··· al-care/ |
|
jaberi |
jaberi
Member
2013-Feb-24 12:19 am
why would a couple from spain seek a canadian surrogate mother, why the preference? |
|
shaner Premium Member join:2000-10-04 Calgary, AB
1 recommendation |
to jaberi
This is a murky one. Frankly, the bill for services is legitimate. The charges are for the care of the child, who once relinquished to foreign adopters, no longer qualify for provincial benefits. It's as if the child never existed as a Canadian citizen, which is legally true, and the child should be charged the same rate as any nonresident should be. Presumably, the fee she charged for being a surrogate more than covered a $1400 medical bill. I do have a problem with Canadians getting free care and profiting from it.
Now, if this was an open adoption in the more traditional sense, then I would have issue with it. |
|
|
jaberi
Member
2013-Feb-24 12:27 am
but if the new-born child stays in canada for 3 months then the fees a waived..did i read that correct? |
|
shaner Premium Member join:2000-10-04 Calgary, AB |
shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 12:29 am
Yes, all provinces have a 3 month residency rule for health care coverage. I suppose in a quasi legal interpretation, the child would be a landed immigrant. |
|
|
|
milnoc
Member
2013-Feb-24 12:33 am
Didn't the baby already reside in Canada for 9 months? |
|
|
jaberi
Member
2013-Feb-24 12:48 am
don't be giving them any ideas |
|
Gone Premium Member join:2011-01-24 Fort Erie, ON |
to shaner
said by shaner:Yes, all provinces have a 3 month residency rule for health care coverage. I suppose in a quasi legal interpretation, the child would be a landed immigrant. When my son was born he had a health card number assigned to him a few minutes after we arrived in the nursery together while his mother was still in the recovery room being cleaned up after the C-section. The permanent card arrived in the mail a little more than a week later. I suppose if the adoption was formalized right after birth and no health card number was assigned you could run into issues. |
|
A Lurkerthat's Ms Lurker btw Premium Member join:2007-10-27 Wellington N 1 edit |
to jaberi
said by jaberi:why would a couple from spain seek a canadian surrogate mother, why the preference? So they can hide the surrogacy from the authorities in Spain. My guess is that they'll come back to Spain claiming to have adopted the child. Their child can't be added to the spanish registry and brought back into the country if they admit to surrogacy. And hey, if born here, their child is Canadian. Might be an incentive later if they don't want to remain in Spain. (I'm not sure how this would work, but it might be part of it.) |
|
koiraHey Siri Walk Me Premium Member join:2004-02-16 |
to jaberi
Several aspects of this need examination including human trafficking, citizenship loopholes. Why can't they find a surrogate closer to home? There is more to it than has been disclosed. |
|
elwoodbluesElwood Blues Premium Member join:2006-08-30 Somewhere in |
to shaner
i don't know about the child not being a citizen or having to wait 3 months for coverage.
There was a story a year or so ago, in which a professional couple came to Canada, the woman was in her 2nd trimester (giving ample time to qualify for Ohip). However she went into labour early, and was given a 22K tab. The kids tab was covered because the child was considered a Canadian.
Jaberi, that logic makes no sense, that logic says if a child is born with complications, they aren't covered till they are 3 months old. |
|
shaner Premium Member join:2000-10-04 Calgary, AB |
shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 9:57 am
said by elwoodblues:i don't know about the child not being a citizen or having to wait 3 months for coverage.
There was a story a year or so ago, in which a professional couple came to Canada, the woman was in her 2nd trimester (giving ample time to qualify for Ohip). However she went into labour early, and was given a 22K tab. The kids tab was covered because the child was considered a Canadian.
Jaberi, that logic makes no sense, that logic says if a child is born with complications, they aren't covered till they are 3 months old. In this case though, the child isn't Canadian. Yes, they meet all the traditional requirements, except the fact that the birth mother is relinquishing all rights to the child and transferring those rights to a foreign national. I can see how a lawyer can argue the child is not a Canadian citizen and should be charged non-citizen rates for health care. To all of the rest of us, yes our children qualify for health care at the moment of birth because they meet the required citizenship requirements. What I'm saying here is that because of the quasi legal citizenship status of these surrogate children, they are essentially being considered to be landed immigrants in the eyes of the Health Insurance System. |
|
shaner |
to A Lurker
said by A Lurker:said by jaberi:why would a couple from spain seek a canadian surrogate mother, why the preference? So they can hide the surrogacy from the authorities in Spain. My guess is that they'll come back to Spain claiming to have adopted the child. Their child can't be added to the spanish registry and brought back into the country if they admit to surrogacy. And hey, if born here, their child is Canadian. Might be an incentive later if they don't want to remain in Spain. (I'm not sure how this would work, but it might be part of it.) That's not part of it at all. From the linked article. quote: The fact that both pre-natal and post-natal care for Canadian surrogates is covered by medicare has actually made this countrys carriers more appealing to some foreign parents, at least in comparison with American carriers, whose medical costs must always be picked up by the intended parents, she said.
And this...surrogace in Italy is illegal, but legal in Spain. » nova-clinic.ru/enservices52/This rule also applies to inter-provincial surrogacy as well. It's just that if the adopting couple are Canadian, it's much easier to track them down and hand them a bill. |
|
|
to jaberi
While I am not a fan of the practice of international surrogacy..
Why is a Canadian being billed for medical services used? We employ universal health coverage, the surrogacy (mother) is a taxpaying Canadian who deserves her universal service.
IMHO That baby is "Canadian" well before birth and should have the right to universal health coverage from the time of birth and beyond. |
|
Gone Premium Member join:2011-01-24 Fort Erie, ON |
Gone to shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 10:28 am
to shaner
said by shaner:In this case though, the child isn't Canadian. Yes, they meet all the traditional requirements, except the fact that the birth mother is relinquishing all rights to the child and transferring those rights to a foreign national. I can see how a lawyer can argue the child is not a Canadian citizen and should be charged non-citizen rates for health care. Unless born to foreign diplomats serving in Canada, anyone born in Canada is a Canadian citizen - end of story. In this case, the child is and will always remain a Canadian citizen, regardless of where the adoptive parents are taking the child. Health coverage has nothing to do with citizenship though, it's all based on residency. An American with Canadian residency is entitled to health insurance, while a Canadian with American residency is not. If the child was deemed to be a non-resident immediately after birth then I could see the child's own post-natal care not being paid for by provincial insurance. Thing is, as I said before, my son had a health card number assigned to him as soon as someone was able to sit down and do the paperwork only a few minutes after he was born. It would ultimately depend on whether or not the birth mother had legal custody. If the birth mother's name is on the hospital paperwork, at some point or another I would have to think she had custody, and as a result I have to wonder how they justify billing as a non-resident, and billing the resident mother with OHIP at that. |
|
elwoodbluesElwood Blues Premium Member join:2006-08-30 Somewhere in |
to I_H8_Spam
The surrogates tab should be covered, but not the child's. Shaner has a point, the mother,in exchange for payment, is carrying the baby and has given up the rights to child long before conception,to a foreign national.
However I don't agree that the same rules apply interprovincally. No matter where they are from, all parties are Canadian. |
|
shaner Premium Member join:2000-10-04 Calgary, AB 1 edit |
shaner to Gone
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 11:07 am
to Gone
said by Gone:Unless born to foreign diplomats serving in Canada, anyone born in Canada is a Canadian citizen - end of story. In this case, the child is and will always remain a Canadian citizen, regardless of where the adoptive parents are taking the child.
Actually, that is not true. We don't have anchor babies. » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ca ··· n_Canadaquote: Section 3(2) of the current act states that Canadian citizenship is not granted to a child born in Canada if, at the time of his/her birth, neither of his/her parents was a Canadian citizen or Canadian permanent resident and either parent was a diplomatic or consular officer or other representative or employee of a foreign government in Canada or an employee of such a person.
In this case, the legal parents are not Canadian citizens and therefore neither is the child. Now, can the child claim Canadian Citizenship status at a later date based on biological lineage? I doubt it. I suppose it depends on the type of surrogacy involved. Was the egg the birthmoms or the "adoptive" mother's? It's a conundrum for sure. As a caveat, I am going through a similar situation right now as my 22 year old biological daughter who was given up for adoption at birth in the USA is applying to have her Canadian Citizenship restored. All feedback we're getting from the Canadian government says it can be done, but it's a long process. Edit: Whoops, looks like I read that wiki quote wrong as I missed the "and" part. But, I'm pretty sure citizenship isn't granted just on the basis of being born here. There are a number of American babies born in Canada each year, and somehow I think I read somewhere that they're not Canadian citizens. I could be wrong of course. |
|
shaner |
to elwoodblues
said by elwoodblues:The surrogates tab should be covered, but not the child's. Shaner has a point, the mother,in exchange for payment, is carrying the baby and has given up the rights to child long before conception,to a foreign national.
However I don't agree that the same rules apply interprovincally. No matter where they are from, all parties are Canadian. I was wrong on the first point. It is illegal in Canada to be paid for surrogacy. As for your second statement, while the child definitely is Canadian, payment for health care is a provincial responsibility and each province has a 3 month residency requirement. What should happen is the adoptive parents coverage should kick in. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden :
|
shaner |
shaner to Gone
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 11:21 am
to Gone
Re: Ontario surrogate mother slapped with $1,400 hospital billGone, I did make an error in stating the citizenship status of the child. I apologize. » www.cbc.ca/news/canada/s ··· hip.html |
|
2 recommendations |
to jaberi
She is renting out her womb for profit*, I don't see an issue with it, why should we use public money to subsidize the wants of infertile couples of another nation to procreate.
(*By law a surrogate is entitled to collect to out-of-pocket costs related to the surrogacy, however too often additional payments can be funnelled around creatively. In addition consultants seem to walk away with large amounts of money for their services of finding a willing surrogate. It is just a big grey area, one that should be better regulated, monitored and enforced.) |
|
Gone Premium Member join:2011-01-24 Fort Erie, ON |
Gone to shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 11:24 am
to shaner
said by shaner:quote: Section 3(2) of the current act states that Canadian citizenship is not granted to a child born in Canada if, at the time of his/her birth, neither of his/her parents was a Canadian citizen or Canadian permanent resident and either parent was a diplomatic or consular officer or other representative or employee of a foreign government in Canada or an employee of such a person.
In this case, the legal parents are not Canadian citizens and therefore neither is the child. You read your own quote wrong, and I highlighted where the difference lies. There is an and between both statements, not an or. The citizenship exception for babies born here only applies to children both of diplomats who are not already citizens or permanent residents. So yes, Canada does have "anchor babies" as you described and anyone born in Canada except for the children of non-citizen/perm resident diplomat as per the above-noted exception are Canadian citizens by birth, not the least of which includes the child born in this particular situation. To highlight the whole "anchor baby" thing, a refugee claimant who gave birth to a child in Canada would have a Canadian citizen for a child without exception, and this would occur even though the claimants themselves may eventually be denied and deported at some point in the future. Whether or not that is right is another debate, but that's exactly what can and does happen and it's all legal. |
|
Gone |
Gone to shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 11:25 am
to shaner
... and I replied before I saw this reply, hehe. |
|
elwoodbluesElwood Blues Premium Member join:2006-08-30 Somewhere in |
to shaner
What I'm getting at Shaner, is if I break a leg while in Alberta, the tab is covered. Same scenario when it comes to birthing, if the kid drops in another province, again under universal Health care, the tab should once again be covered. |
|
shaner Premium Member join:2000-10-04 Calgary, AB |
shaner
Premium Member
2013-Feb-24 12:04 pm
Oh, you're right. But if you break a leg in Alberta, OHIP gets billed for it. AHS coverage doesn't kick in until you establish residency for 3 months. Typically, this is a seamless process. However, this inter-provincial surrogacy is not typical.
I don't disagree with you, but I can see the governmental red tape involved with getting the Quebec health insurance to pay for the birth of a child born in Ontario to an Ontario woman covered by OHIP and trying to get OHIP to pay for the birth of a child whose legal parents at birth are residents of Quebec. Clearly the child is covered, but the question is which government insurance policy pays for it. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden :
|
1 recommendation |
to I_H8_Spam
Re: Ontario surrogate mother slapped with $1,400 hospital billsaid by I_H8_Spam:While I am not a fan of the practice of international surrogacy..
Why is a Canadian being billed for medical services used? We employ universal health coverage, the surrogacy (mother) is a taxpaying Canadian who deserves her universal service.
IMHO That baby is "Canadian" well before birth and should have the right to universal health coverage from the time of birth and beyond. Wait, you want me to subsidize with my tax dollars the birth of a commercialized kid in which the surrogate mother made $40,000 off him? Yeah right. |
|
FFH5 Premium Member join:2002-03-03 Tavistock NJ |
to Thane_Bitter
said by Thane_Bitter:She is renting out her womb for profit*, I don't see an issue with it, why should we use public money to subsidize the wants of infertile couples of another nation to procreate.
I agree. |
|
|
to Xstar_Lumini
said by Xstar_Lumini:Wait, you want me to subsidize with my tax dollars the birth of a commercialized kid in which the surrogate mother made $40,000 off him? Yeah right. While I am not a fan of the practice of international surrogacy. What I take exception with is some hospital bureaucrat deciding to deny this baby(and others) it's universal health coverage at a profiteering whim. "The Grand River Hospital in Kitchener, Ont., will charge intended parents from outside the province unless the baby stays in Ontario for at least three months" --- In December 1978 my mother who then resided in Mississauga flew to Vancouver to spend Christmas with my soon to be father. At the time she was carrying 6 month old me, during the visit she developed an staph infection that resulted in my coming to term at 26 week a whole 2lbs, 9oz. No bills, no inter-provincial bickering, sure it was a different time. |
|
A Lurkerthat's Ms Lurker btw Premium Member join:2007-10-27 Wellington N |
to shaner
I got the opposite answer when looking for legality in Spain. » www.velascolawyers.com/e ··· ain.html(Since this is a Spanish law firm, I'm assuming it's correct.) You may not be thrown in jail over it, however, the child may need a Visa to enter Spain (and currently not considered a spanish citizen). |
|