republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Northeast PA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

reply to OwlSaver

Re: Ruling

said by OwlSaver:

Cablevision, you are correct, this is clearly illegal. And oh, by the way, you cannot force your customers to bundle either.

You do understand that the "forced" bundling of channels is a technical requirement of analog cable systems, right? The cable company can trap out blocks of channels if you decline to pay for them, but it's not very feasible from a technical or administrative standpoint to trap out individual channels in an a la carte service model.

A purely digital cable plant would solve this problem, but then you'll have people bitching about the fact they need a CableCARD or set top box for each of the twenty TVs they have scattered about the house.

TheRogueX

join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO

...but we should already be purely digital. I know Mediacom has transitioned my town to it. You have to have the little digital converter box for any TV you want any channels on.


BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to Crookshanks
Well, it's vestigial then in an all-digital world as of the last couple of years (and one that's been all-digital on DirecTV since 1994).

FYI, in case you've been living under a rock, most cable systems in the US are all digital. TWC was one of the first, now Comcast and Verizon are, and I think others are as well.


Friday, 24-May 10:17:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics