said by jmn1207:
Wouldn't it be in the DMCA's best interest to send out millions of false alerts to innocent people?
A person that legitimately violated copyright is not likely to pay $35 to protest, only the falsely accused have any reason to want to protest.
If there is no reciprocal punishment for blatantly false accusations, they may as well just send Guido and Big Tony door-to-door to shake up the locals for "protection" money.
this is the plan all along....that 35 dolalr fee is just s shake down...a way to extort or extract more money from the consumer...thats all it is...and one way or another...they will get that money from us...