 BloggerJedi PosterPremium
join:2012-10-18
1 edit | reply to Dustyn
Re: Java 7 Update 17 and 6 Update 43 Why do we even need the current Java?
Why or what potential is there to rebuild Java, and do we have the ability to do it so it's effective, needed, and secure?
--
The signal is usually drowned out by the noise. |
|
 DustynPremium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
kudos:10 | said by Blogger:Why do we even need the current Java.
Why or what potential is there to rebuild Java, and do we have the ability to do it so its effective, needed, and secure?
Good points... I use it for LibreOffice (however I've read it can now work without it), FrostWire, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12 and Arcsoft Total Media Theatre 6. There are also the online Java speed tests that I find provide a more accurate representation than their flash counterparts. Right now, I still have a small use for it.
Every time I reinstall the latest version of Java I see that message about how "BILLIONS" (maybe it's millions?) of applications and hardware utilize Java. So it might be worth while re-building it in that respect . 
--
Remember that cool hidden "Graffiti Wall" here on BBR? After the name change I became the "owner", so to speak as it became: Dustyn's Wall »[Serious] RIP
|
|
|
|
| reply to Blogger
said by Blogger:Why do we even need the current Java?
It's possible you don't, in which case don't load it. But I run programs that need it, so I do.
Or am I just supposed to stop working to please you? |
|
BloggerJedi PosterPremium
join:2012-10-18 Reviews:
 ·Champion Broadba..
| said by goalieskates:said by Blogger:Why do we even need the current Java?
It's possible you don't, in which case don't load it. But I run programs that need it, so I do. Or am I just supposed to stop working to please you? Please note the question mark at the end of my last comment as opposed to a period or exclamation point.
--
The signal is usually drowned out by the noise. |
|
