Re: [Television] Another Samsung - Cisco question - Videotron

Author	All Replies
JoePro join:2006-11-01 Montreal, QC Reviews: ·ELECTRONICBOX	reply to saitoh183 Re: [Television] Another Samsung - Cisco question Now that I think about it, what you're describing might be different from the feature removed from Illico NG. There used to be an option to turn on the terminal by pressing one of the numeric keys on the remote. That's gone. I thought that's why you were using the double blast, but I could be mistaken.
	to forum · permalink · 2013-03-11 22:32:16 ·
saitoh183 Premium join:2012-01-08 Saint-Eustache, QC Reviews: ·ELECTRONICBOX	Ah, ic, no, the reason was really because first blast wakes up PVR(first key press didnt register in channel number...ie: 602 would do 02) so second blast insured that i got 602. So now back to topic, should i try to get the samsung or just settle for the Cisco? @GuiGQc: i have the intention of changing to illico NG with the new machine. All i really care about is getting more speed when tune to a new channel and also have a machine that doesnt go to sleep so i dont have to double blast anymore.
	to forum · permalink · 2013-03-12 01:29:43 ·

O Canada! > Canadian > Videotron > [Television] Another Samsung - Cisco question