 alanhdslPremium join:1999-10-09 Phoenix, AZ | [AZ] Email authentication inside Cox network I'm having a problem sending email. I'm sending from inside Cox's network, but I'm getting "550 5.1.1 relaying not allowed" from smtp.west.cox.net
I thought this was only an issue when sending via Cox's SMTP server from outside Cox's network. Do I need to authenticate while inside too? |
|
 alanhdslPremium join:1999-10-09 Phoenix, AZ | I did switch to using port 587 and authentication, and it did work. Hm. Looks like it started around the beginning of March. I don't send a lot of e-mail, so I hadn't noticed. |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 1 edit | You might also want to remove "west" from the hostname too, that's no longer required. |
|
 Beezel join:2008-12-15 Las Vegas, NV | said by CoxTech1:You might also want to remote "west" from the hostname too, that's no longer required. I think you mean 'Remove" instead of "remote".  |
|
 Optimus2357Premium join:2010-11-21 West Warwick, RI kudos:1 | reply to alanhdsl What does it say as your ISP at
»whatismyipaddress.com/
Also, do you have a cox.net for your incoming mail? Are you on a Business or Residential connection? As long as your on a Cox Residential connection, and have a valid cox.net address for inbound (both email and username), outbound should work on port 25 with no authentication. Not that it really matters though, if its a laptop, then its better to set it up with Authentication, on port 587 with SSL, that way it will work anywhere, so perhaps its a blessing in disguise. |
|
|
|
 m8trix join:2003-12-24 Phoenix, AZ kudos:3 | port 587 is for TLS, for SSL you should be on port 465 |
|
 Optimus2357Premium join:2010-11-21 West Warwick, RI kudos:1 | TLS is backwards compatible with SSL. Alot of it comes down to client implementation, so trial and error is sometimes required. TLS won't work on 465 though, so I find port 587 is a better place to start since it has a wider compatibility. Either way, if I had to guess, he was using a different email and pop server for incoming, and that's what caused the problem |
|