 KonaguyLive From Kailua-Kona, HawaiiPremium
join:2000-10-21
Kailua Kona, HI
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to SanAntonioTx
Re: Timewarner releases 50/20 mb Connection in San Antonio Texas I was told it will take 90-120 days to reallocate the reclaimed analog spectrum to Oceanic Time Warner Cable's HSI and HDTV services. This additional bandwidth will allow Oceanic to raise the standard tier Road Runner speed from 10/1 to 15/1.
Hawaiian Telcom is planning to roll out faster HSI and IPTV services to the neighbor islands. Their acquisition of Wavecom Solutions has sped up this process. However, the terrestrial infrastrastructure needs to be upgraded and regulatory approvals have to be secured before this happens. |
|
| reply to Elyria
said by Elyria:Isn't this the same guy who had the cam filming some TW employees from some ghetto house in texas?
and then was on some ship off LA ??
Now do you guys see why i posted towards the beginning of this thread that this guy can't be trusted you can see that Motorola called his bluff earlier then of course he goes and edit's the post that Motorola quoted. |
|
etaadmin
join:2002-01-17
Dallas, TX
kudos:1
1 edit | said by nephipower:said by Elyria:Isn't this the same guy who had the cam filming some TW employees from some ghetto house in texas?
and then was on some ship off LA ??
Now do you guys see why i posted towards the beginning of this thread that this guy can't be trusted you can see that Motorola called his bluff earlier then of course he goes and edit's the post that Motorola quoted. Yeah, but your attitude leaves a lot to be desired too. One thing is that you don't like the kid and have a personal grudge and another is to try to understand what is happening and try to get all the evidence information in place.
If I remember correctly it was me who requested the modem signals and channel information that helped solve the case.
In my mind there is one remaining question, and that is how is he getting more than 18Mbps on the upload with only 1 upstream channel? Cache? uncapped modem? How? |
|
 Elyria
join:2011-10-12
Elyria, OH | reply to nephipower
said by nephipower:said by Elyria:Isn't this the same guy who had the cam filming some TW employees from some ghetto house in texas?
and then was on some ship off LA ??
Now do you guys see why i posted towards the beginning of this thread that this guy can't be trusted you can see that Motorola called his bluff earlier then of course he goes and edit's the post that Motorola quoted. 10-4
His obvious intention, is to seek attention.
Yet another drive-by BS session |
|
|
|
| reply to etaadmin
said by etaadmin:Yeah, but your attitude leaves a lot to be desired too. One thing is that you don't like the kid and have a personal grudge and another is to try to understand what is happening and try to get all the evidence information in place.
If I remember correctly it was me who requested the modem signals and channel information that helped solve the case.
In my mind there is one remaining question, and that is how is he getting more than 18Mbps on the upload with only 1 upstream channel? Cache? uncapped modem? How?
I don't have a problem with the guy personally and of course when people post stuff it is hard to tell some one's tone because don't you don't get any of the body language like how they say something.
All I have been trying to say if I have seen this guy post stuff before and making all these claims and the evidence he presented before didn't seem to add up.
I can't explain how he is getting these speed tests that show about 18 mbit upload. However, why would he post his signal stats and change them after someone called him out that they are fake.
If you are posting legit modem signal stats then you would be just copy and pasting. There would be no reason why you got 3 extra lines for having a signal unless you faked it.
I also agree with Elyria that he is just seeking attention which if that is what he wants someone on the internet will give him that. |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
| reply to nephipower
Re: Timewarner releases 50/20 mb Connection in San Antonio Texas said by nephipower:said by etaadmin:said by nephipower:SanAntonioTX guy have posted some deceptive and fake stuff in the past.
I will believe this more when he posts a link to a speedtest results jpg and not an uploaded photo or video. So we know he just didn't fake it.
I don't know SanAntonioTx  but to which posts are you referring to? Can you provide us with some links? Faking a video is much harder than faking a jpg. I have no reason to doubt the authenticity of SanAntonioTx video unless you provide factual testimony of the contrary. Besides it is widely known (I know this because my modem is using 4/8 channels) that TWC is currently activating 4 upstream channels so what could be the purpose for this? The logical answer is higher upload speeds. With the information I have now I have no reason to doubt SanAntonioTx video. Edit: By carefully examining the video I can clearly see the ip address in one of the tests and it resolves to cpe-xx-xx-xx-xxx.satx.res.rr.com which is a TWI (road runner) residential account. So no deceit here. Agreed perhaps how I said things earlier was a bit harsh but basically what happened before with the sketchy info was concern speed tests that was done for 4G Sprint LTE here in San Antonio. This happened on the s4gru.com site that is run by a Sprint engineer and he provided great information to people about the Sprint 4G rollout. Basically SanAntonioTX aka "ComputerMaster" on Youtube did speedtests that didn't seem to add up at all. For example, the Sprint engineer described speeds they were getting via field tests before the towers were opened up to customers. Then ComputerMaster was claiming to get speeds much faster than the engineer said was even possible. Things just didn't seem to add up. Correction: Robert (the guy who runs S4GRU) isn't a Sprint engineer, but he and AJ (WiWavelength over there) nearly might as well be. But yes, I recall "LTE" speed tests from ComputerMaster that outdid Sprint's theoretic maximum of ~37M down, ~13M up. I've gotten within a few megabits of that maximum, but it was very close to a tower in the middle of nowhere on a sector that covered practically no one. You can't really get any better than that, certainly not within San Antonio. And he did. So his credibility is suspect. |
|
