 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to BF69
Re: From the Sounds of it. So, the position you're advocating is once you buy something, it should have zero resale value, that you really should have no ownership rights whatsoever, and first sale doctrine is null and void.
Insurance companies would love you. "Yes, we know you paid $XYZ for it, but since it's actual value once you purchased it is zero, the amount we owe you on the claim is zero."
This is such an extreme position. The opposing end of the spectrum should be "Since I can't sell it, and since it is of zero worth to me, I should only pay what it's worth, which is zero." Everything I want I shall simply take, and it's free, with no repercussions. Fair and balanced. Two ridiculous extremes.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
