said by uhh :said by TypeS:No number of bones thrown at them will satisfy them all, there's always going to be one person who wants more.
Um. He isn't asking for more. He's actually asking for less. You may want to re-read what he said, and maybe this time try to understand it.
The guy isn't wrong. I find myself in agreement with what he stated.
It's not for me, but I guess maybe it's a choice for others who want to have to pay for nothing. As long as they pay for nothing and it's less than Rogers or Bell. That is all that matters to some (or most) people.
Anyhow, it's a choice. Better than no choice.
No I believe you need to learn the English language a bit better before you go criticizing what someone said.
Since you can't understand what I said, I'll have to spell it out. When I said "more", I mean they expect more from the company despite the company continually trying to improve their product or service. It does not mean he wanted "more" channels. And BTW, that was directed at not just him a but a lot of people that gripe at all the alternative media providers and IISPs about every little detail and disregard everything else these companies have tried to do for Canadian consumers.
Not sure where you going with this "pay for nothing" thing, but if you could, find me a TV service provider a true a la carte offering where you pick channel by channel what you want and you don't pay for any channel you'd never watch.