said by DSL_Ricer:You say that, but wasn't the basis of CRTC's rejection uncorrelated usage based fines that wholesalers couldn't reliably do this attribution?
No, with the UBB it was that we'd just get a block of usage but not be able to know what TN it came from to associate it back with a customer, likewise Bell wouldn't be able to correlate it to a TN in our account and it'd be dropped (or billed) as uncorrelated with no details for us to reconcile.
In this scenario the abuser will either show up as a secondary authentication, and/or the BAS identifier will be different, as well as if speeds exceed the package they have ordered.