site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


djdanska
Rudie32
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
MX
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Verizon Broadban..
·Clear Wireless
·Time Warner Cable
·T-Mobile US

reply to monchis

Re: Too bad...

said by monchis:

said by motoracer:

T-Mobile has terrible coverage and basically no LTE service. Everyone I know around Los Angeles complains about dropped calls, texts that never go through, etc.

Whose going to pay $100 upfront then $20/month for 24 months for a phone? That's $580 just for the phone...Just because you break it up into a monthly payment doesn't mean you're getting a deal.

No thanks T-Mobile.

You are getting a deal because:

1) no contract
2) realistic - you know exactly what you're getting into
3) NO INTEREST charges
4) low priced plans
5) no contract
6)that is a great price for a new phone

For the record, I live in Los angeles, and t-mobile is the best here. So your comment on everyone you know can be disregarded because you're not speaking from your personal experience like I am. I've had verizon/sprint/att - terrible in LA.

I live in San Diego and trek up to LA for stuff occasionally and had no problem up there at all. So, your right.
--
The day the child realizes that all adults are imperfect, he becomes an adolescent; the day he forgives them, he becomes an adult. The day he forgives himself, he becomes wise.
Alden Nowlan

Sunday, 07-Apr 22:47:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics