As much as I like ...
As much as I like my cell phone, I can't help but think this is an issue. I don't feel any different when expose to my phone's radiation so i'm not sensitive to it in the least, but i don't doubt that there are some who are.
If there is evidence that the radiation causes harm, apart from the those who are super sensitive to it, I doubt that the industry will admit to it simply because of how lucrative the mobile market has become. Instead they will play the semantics game as mentioned in the article "treating the ear as an extremity", really? I mean, how far is your ear from your head, or brain for that matter.
They will say that "X" amount of watts is hazardous but "x" amount is safe, but is "x" amount really safe if you're going to be subjected to it for the rest of life since the cell phone is not going away anytime soon?
Like I said, I'm all geeked out myself with gadgets, and have been using a cell phone for about 20 years, but I can't help but think that we're sleeping with the enemy on this one. At the end of the day the people get what the people wants. They want a solid connection and that comes with a price and when the Galaxy S4 & iPhone6 hit the shelves radiation exposure will be the least researched spec that people look for.
Good judgement comes with experience...Experience comes after bad judgements
Sensitive? This has only become an issue with more and more Wifi networks being built and people that don't want towers in their "back yards".
The World Health Org has stated as well that this is NOT an issue anywhere in the world and is BS. They've conducted the study and the FCC shouldn't be spending money on crap as this since there is no proof yet, all kinds of studies that say this "being sensitive" is BS. But I bet this same people that are crying about it- could live next to a Tree Tower and wouldn't even complain if they didn't know the tree had a cell tower mounted in it.