Reviews:
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to odog
Re: [AZ] Modem Choice Well, i am planning go forward to DOCSIS 3.1 what it will buy me a better ones that is more efficient spectrum of bandwidth at while reducing the 1Ghz bandwidth range, not increasing above beyond the 1Ghz bandwidth range spectrum that's goes buy me into DOCSIS 3.1 where i am looking forward.
In other words, that DOCSIS 3.1 can provides up to 10Gbits/1Gbits that is better width band. |
|
 bbeesleyVIP
join:2003-08-07
Richardson, TX
kudos:5 | said by ikyuaoki:Well, i am planning go forward to DOCSIS 3.1
unless you are building your own cable network you will be wasting your time
3.1 is not yet a standard and if and when it does become one, it will introduce new mechanisms for increasing bandwidth such as mid-splits to add upstream carriers above 85Mhz as well as OFDM signalling that will increase downstream capacity
but until then standard is ratified, and vendors go through certification and your service provider deploys new CMTS equipment and makes the necessary upgrades to the RF infrastructure, a 3.1 modem will gain nothing over your current 3.0 modem |
|
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
| That OFDM signals are more efficient spectrum channels over the old QAM channels. unlikely the QAM, the OFDM does not use the big 6Mhz channel or 8Mhz channel in europe of an width band per channel.
that's what i am looking forward to the DOCSIS 3.1 specification. |
|
|
|
 Optimus2357Premium
join:2010-11-21
West Warwick, RI
kudos:1 | reply to m8trix
Perhaps "demolish" was too strong a word. I have just found newer is not always better. Without going into too much detail, I believe the build quality of a 6120 is better then the SB6121, the main difference being the case for better brand clarity (SB901 looking like the SB6120). Consider that along with the fact that some manufactures find ways to reduce cost while still keeping the same product specs to increase profit margin as the product line matures, I believe the SB6120 is superior in any market that does not have more then 4 channels downstream available yet. I know there are many other variables too, my point was just don't count the ol' boy out quite yet.  |
|
