Reviews:
 ·HughesNet Satell..
| reply to silbaco
Re: As Far As I'm Concerned said by silbaco:Hardly anyone would have broadband, with no reasonable way of getting it. What good would that do? The point is to have achievable thresholds. No telco would be able to provide that, even with Annex M, unless they have fiber or VDSL.
I still don't see how that would change anything, the service I have isn't "Broadband" under the current definition, but it still exists.
I don't understand what the issue with setting goals higher, with the advancement of video and such that are getting more data hungry 3mbps doesn't seem as broad as it used to.
As far as latency is concerned I think it should me mentioned at the very least, it can often be more important than just raw speed. |
| There are some companies that strive to make sure all their subscribers have real broadband or compare their services to what is classified as broadband. If the definition of broadband is too high, they will stop taking the FCC seriously. |
