 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| [Cable] Trying to use a gigabit switch with DCM475 modem directl my modem has begun annoying me (Dlink DIR-655). No matter how dumb I make it (turned things like QoS off) it gives me problems one way or another. It's actually very stable when the pretty much every feature is turned off but it increases ping and feels a little bit sluggish compared to being connected to my gigabit switch, or being connected to the modem directly. Keep in mind, the switch is transparent, and unmanaged.
Now, when i connect one computer to the switch, its fine. But any other computer connected to the switch, and it won't get a connection to the nets. I am aware that, on the Thomson DCM475 Modem's page (192.168.100.1) it states:
Configuration Parameters: Computers Allowed by Service Provider: 2 Computers Detected by Modem: 2
according to this, i should at least get one more computer connected, but its detecting a magical second computer ):
i find it quite annoying to have a limiter set on how many computers are allowed. I mean using routers we can connect many computers, but using a switch...only 2 theoretically ):
EDIT: to avoid confusion, here is my setup with the gigabit switch Modem>GbE Switch>Computer 1,2 |
|
 Sunfox join:2003-12-14 Markham, ON 2 edits | Re: [Cable] Trying to use a gigabit switch with DCM475 modem dir A modem is not a router is not a switch, although yes you can buy one device that does two or all three of these functions.
A plain-jane cable modem like the Thomson wants to pass a single routable IP directly to a device and make it visible to the outside world. Despite what that screen says, you only get one routable IP from Rogers/TSI and thus only one computer can use the net (although you used to be able to buy more IPs - not sure if that's still an option).
If you have more than one network device that you want to give access to the net, you *need* a router between the modem and your switch. So, buy a better router and you won't have speed issues. |
|
 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| i rebooted the modem with only 2 computers connected to the switch and finally got both computers connected. i have different IPs for each computer. one ends in 18 the other ends in 14, both are public. (rest of numbers are the same) whats the reason for a cable modem being different in terms of IP's. my Speedtouch gives local IP (192.168.xxx.xxx)to all devices connected to the modem, except one computer (if setup like that). I can use my gigabit switch on the DSL modem :/
either that, or i guess I have to wait until IPV6 is more widely adopted . |
|
 | reply to nfsc As Sunfox stated, consumer ISPs usually only provide one external IP per customer. If you're lucky you might get two. Because of this, to use multiple devices you need routers that use NAT routing to have multiple devices using a single external IP. Using a switch doesn't work because you don't have enough IP addresses for all your stuff.
It's not a "limiter." It's just what it is, a limitation of the technology. There aren't enough IPv4 addresses to give one to every single internet-connected device in the world. |
|
 | reply to nfsc Your Speedtouch isn't a simple modem. It includes a router inside, hence why it has a DHCP server to assign internal IPs, and uses NAT routing. |
|
 NeTwOrKDawgNetworking is a lifestyle join:2005-04-25 Brantford, ON | reply to nfsc You guys are just confusing him.
A cable modem detects computers via MAC address. Your switch even unmanaged would have a MAC address on it's network interfaces.
This is where the magical second computer is coming from.
In order to use a switch with a cable mode, and have multiple PC, you need to add # of PC + 1. In your case it would have to be Computers Allowed by Service Provider: 3 or more. |
|
 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by NeTwOrKDawg:In order to use a switch with a cable mode, and have multiple PC, you need to add # of PC + 1. In your case it would have to be Computers Allowed by Service Provider: 3 or more. like i said, the gigabit switch is transparent since its unmanaged. it has no mac address. i have not found a way to actually detect the switch through any means.
also, read my second post..i got the second computer connected 
now i don't plan on keeping this troublesome setup, what router should i get. One that doesnt make your internet worst with all its features.
i have been eyeing the Asus RT-AC66U lately. Anyone have experience with this router? |
|
 | People say it's good...although AC tech isn't that mature yet. Most would rather get the RT-N66U. However since you plan on using more advanced features, you might consider a MicroTik router. I haven't used one personally but I hear they're excellent. |
|
 NeTwOrKDawgNetworking is a lifestyle join:2005-04-25 Brantford, ON | reply to nfsc Are you certain it has no MAC? Just because it isn't managed does not mean it doesn't have a MAC address. What model is the switch?
If it support STP, it is almost guaranteed to have a MAC. |
|
 NeTwOrKDawgNetworking is a lifestyle join:2005-04-25 Brantford, ON | reply to nfsc Anyways, as for router, what features do you want/need?
There are soooo many out there. |
|
 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to NeTwOrKDawg its a Netgear GS108 Pro-Safe 8 port Gigabit switch.
As for router features, USB 3.0 would be nice, and being able to load Tomato or DD-WRT firmware onto it. Also want 450mbps at least, dual band. Everything else is pretty basic. But most importantly, i want reliability of course (who doesn't).
Those MicroTik routers...i can't find a reseller near by for them, (the Microtik RB2011UAS-2HnD-IN paired with the 5GHZ anntenna has caught my attention). My neighbors router causes troubles hogging up nearly all of the 2.4GHz band Q_Q, especially considering the guest SSID and the main SSID on one router are on two different channels. ): i have to manually set the channel on my DIR-655 just to get a stable connection, as the auto channel selection is completely useless and chooses channel 6 (hogged by other router) no matter what :|
Also, about the Asus RT-N66U, people are saying it runs hot, which worries me. Other than that, the N66U seems like my current option. |
|
 GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:19 | reply to nfsc Why is there any confusion here? Connect the cable modem to the router's WAN port (it should be labelled as such on the router's physical body) via the provided ethernet cable, and nothing else. You can't plug your cable modem into a switch. As you've discovered, it won't work. -- Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org |
|
 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by Guspaz:You can't plug your cable modem into a switch. As you've discovered, it won't work. but it magically does for 2 computers...read my second post also, i am currently posting from the computer that is connected to the modem through the switch. |
|
 nitzguyPremium join:2002-07-11 Sudbury, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to nfsc said by nfsc:said by NeTwOrKDawg:In order to use a switch with a cable mode, and have multiple PC, you need to add # of PC + 1. In your case it would have to be Computers Allowed by Service Provider: 3 or more. like i said, the gigabit switch is transparent since its unmanaged. it has no mac address. i have not found a way to actually detect the switch through any means. also, read my second post..i got the second computer connected  now i don't plan on keeping this troublesome setup, what router should i get. One that doesnt make your internet worst with all its features. i have been eyeing the Asus RT-AC66U lately. Anyone have experience with this router? Did EVERYONE miss the obvious here?
the "2nd magical computer" was in fact his old D-link DIR-655 router....it has a mac address, the cable modem doesn't care if its a router, a 486, an internet enabled fridge...whatever...it just sees a mac and it assigns an address in it.
Cable modems hold onto that memory for some reason and when he reset the modem, it wiped that and then allowed 2 different computers to connect...
Ideally to speed along this process you'd do an ipconfig /release (or whatever equivalent) to have that mac unbound from the cable modem to then allow a second computer to connect.
Most ISPs don't like this because it cuts down on the useable number of public IPs...as you notice you are getting now, you're not getting private IPs from the cable modem, but public routable IPs from the ISPs DHCP server....which then cuts down on the number of IPs available for everyone else, which turns into full scopes, which turns into people complaining and saying "I can't get an IP", TSI turns around and goes whats going on, we in theory have more than enough IPs for that area...turns out more people are grabbling public IPs than is neccessary...
Anywho, my rant for the day...but any router will work...some like ASUS, some like Netgear, personally I have a WNR3500L that works pretty good with the Tomato firmware....it does N...I can connect my external USB HDD to it....its not great on performance, but due to my server's power supply biting the dust its a temporary work around and still allows me to stream my movies with no issues...
Good luck to you  |
|
 GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:19 | reply to nfsc It works for as many devices as the ISP has configured it to work for. In most cases that limit is one. In your case it seems the limit is two. Neither is a particularly useful number, and there's no good reason to do what you're doing. -- Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org |
|
 nfsc join:2011-11-05 North York, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by Guspaz: ... and there's no good reason to do what you're doing. i don't think i can convince you without explaining in detail about my personal situation i shall accept there is no good reason why i am doing this. 
im not a big fan of netgear products. they are ok.
also might add, i despise Dlink if you guys haven't noticed. i have 5 Dlink routers, none of them except 2 work, on is one of those really old wireless G versions that were grey, silver and green. Then there is the DIR-655, which is only stable when its working dumb. |
|
 | reply to nfsc I have a Cisco RVS4000 that I'm pretty happy with.
Behind that I have a Netgear 8 port prosafe gigbit switch that I'm pretty happy about. It has a lot of features and configures easily depending on what I want to do. Ive always had a good opinion of Netgear Prosafe products.
Attached to that I have a Linksys WAP610N that I'm not overly enthusiastic about but it works so w/e.
I'm pretty happy with the cisco rvs4000 as a router. It's never locked up on me. performs as expected. Has a couple of revisions of firmware that seem to fix/break different things depending on what you want to do hahaha. All kidding aside, I like it. My buddy bought one also and Ive never had to sort out any network issues for him. -- Opinions and ideas expressed in my post are my own and in no way represent those of Bell Canada Enterprises, Bell Canada, Bell TV, Bell Internet, Bell Mobility, Bell Technical Solutions, Expertech, or any other partners under the BCE umbrella. |
|
 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:4 | reply to nitzguy It was a great explanation nitzguy, but...
said by nitzguy:Cable modems hold onto that memory for some reason and when he reset the modem, it wiped that I believe resetting the modem causes Rogers DHCP server to release the old leases and start issuing new ones. I don't think anything about the public IP leases is actually stored in the modem. Of course I could be wrong, and I'm very interested in confirmation details either way! -- electronicsguru.ca |
|
 Teddy Boomk kudos Received join:2007-01-29 Toronto, ON kudos:4 | reply to Guspaz said by Guspaz:there's no good reason to do what you're doing. Depends on your Good threshold, I guess.. You could put the gaming PC on the second public IP to cut a few ms off the ping. Admittedly kind of silly. You could put VoIP gear on the second public IP, but obviously better to get up to date gear with an up to date router. In a doctor's office you could use the two public IPs to segment the network: first IP on a router for the office staff, second IP on a router for the patients/public. Still not completely needed of course, it is obviously possible to segment a network off of a single router. Nice easy solution though, that doesn't require any special expertise. -- electronicsguru.ca |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to nfsc said by nfsc:said by Guspaz:You can't plug your cable modem into a switch. As you've discovered, it won't work. but it magically does for 2 computers...read my second post also, i am currently posting from the computer that is connected to the modem through the switch. Your old speedtouch was a router/modem hybrid. It would take one public IP and assign private ones internally. Your new modem is a modem only, it cannot assign private IPs. Once you hit your limit on public IPs (2) the modem doesn't have any more to give. The problem is not the switch, which is basically just a dumb port multiplier. The switch has zero awareness of IP addresses.
You need to pair your modem with a router, which will then be able to take a public IP and assign private ones internally. You're only unhappy with the D-Link router because it's a crappy one, as most D-Link products are. You should find the experience with the Asus router you mentioned excellent. I've heard nothing but positive things about the RT-N66U. -- Taylor Byrnes |
|