axus
join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC | I've always thought of gag orders as unconstitutional Gag orders seem in direct violation of the first amendment. Every judge disagrees with me, of course.
Sure you can violate a contract by saying something that you agreed not to say, but there's no consent involved in a gag order. |
|
dra6o0n
join:2011-08-15
Mississauga, ON | People can wrap words in different ways, to get around things.
This is called Law. |
|
|
|
 camaro92Question everythingPremium
join:2008-04-05
Westfield, MA
 ·Comcast
| reply to axus
To me a gag order is put in place to hide the real truth from the public when juicy stuff is being decided in court. For some reason if any case has been sealed or continued without a finding can be dug up by doing some research, but when something has a gag order, forget about it, you will never be able to see those file's. |
|
| reply to axus
The federal spooks (more properly the U.S. Gestapo) don't give a rats' tushie about constitutional protections. They do whatever they d*** well please and if you get in their way or fail to bow and obey you are asking for a trip to Gitmo. |
|
