 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | reply to tauwyt
Re: faster Uverse speeds (Project VIP) coming soon? I kinda knew the second line would probably be an issue. Originally, even with a tone on the line, it wasn't giving a signal at the X-Box. I/R had to repair it, but despite testing it, there are apparently still issues. I have to say, the prem. techs and the I/R guys are really being crippled by the fact that the SELT has recently been failing on F-Cards, from what I was told. Without SELT working correctly, it is difficult for them to troubleshoot metallic faults on a line. |
|
 whamelbillhamel DOT netPremium join:2002-05-09 Hinsdale, IL kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
| Noticed too that the prem tech, when running SELT test, was taking too long. That's when he decided to connect my pairs to adjacent, previously unused F-Cards. This was done on a second truck roll after I was getting high numbers of FEC errors and random retrains... -- Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | Sounds just like what my second pair is doing now. |
|
 Mr FelFlynn LivesPremium join:2008-03-17 Louisville, KY Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to whamel
Two things, directly at the xbox off the vdsl out on the JDSU's, whether the 3.2 or forbid the 2.6, will often read the estimated loop length as 0' to 200', or once in a blue moon over 9000'. I tend to ignore that stat at the xbox. Typically see attenuation vary from nearly 0 to under 2dB also at the xbox as well.
Second thing, I don't let meter go below a 20% charge, readings for me are typically off compared to the same meter on full charge. -- Change the scheme, alter the mood! Electrify the boys and girls if you'd be so kind. |
|
|
|
 whamelbillhamel DOT netPremium join:2002-05-09 Hinsdale, IL kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
| said by Mr Fel:Two things, directly at the xbox off the vdsl out on the JDSU's, whether the 3.2 or forbid the 2.6, will often read the estimated loop length as 0' to 200', or once in a blue moon over 9000'. I tend to ignore that stat at the xbox. Typically see attenuation vary from nearly 0 to under 2dB also at the xbox as well.
Second thing, I don't let meter go below a 20% charge, readings for me are typically off compared to the same meter on full charge.
There wasn't much I could do, I couldn't be picky either way since I was taking photos of the techs JDSU. It isn't mine...and i'm not gonna bother him to do those things....
HOWEVER you do make a very valid point. -- Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | Most meters say in the manual not to let them go below 20% or so due to erratic operation. It comes from a change in how the batteries behave when they get that drained. It can make complex equipment like the JDSU start acting in unusual ways. |
|
 sloe join:2007-11-09 San Antonio, TX | reply to morbo
Huh, according to today's press release, San Antonio gets VIP on Sunday.
I can't get it though, I'm too far from VRAD. I'd like them to fix my lines, though, so I could at least get 25/3. |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | reply to tauwyt
Line 2 has officially gone to shit:

A negative max rate... Do you think that means it's actually stealing bandwidth from Line 1... |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:2 | HOLY F***! Damn!
They need to get you onto a K-Card, quick. |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | said by trparky:HOLY F***! Damn!
They need to get you onto a K-Card, quick. We can only hope. They're coming tomorrow morning to figure out what the hell is going on. Since the readings on that line, when it was working, were solid, I'm betting it is the card.
All three services keep going in and out, even VoIP is breaking up. |
|
 | Wishing you had a 2wire, to run UVRealtime on line2?  |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | It is too bad the Moto's don't give more line data. |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | reply to tauwyt
The same exact line just now:

I have NEVER seen that line with such a high rate. Not even my conditioned line syncs this high.
This is just too weird. Line 2 is totally schizo. Either way, the pairs need to be rebalanced, Line 1 is overloaded. |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:2 | Quick... run outside and see if an AT&T van is parked anywhere in your neighborhood. -- Tom Tom's Tech Blog |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 1 edit | said by trparky:Quick... run outside and see if an AT&T van is parked anywhere in your neighborhood. I don't see any, but my VRAD is not within my line of sight.
It's still throwing CRCs, so I don't think I'm out of the woods yet.
The attenuation really dropped in that second pic. That is just odd.
If line 2 stays good I just need them to rebalance my provisioning. Line 1 is stressed under such a heavy load. |
|
 dweeb join:2002-06-23 Ferndale, MI | reply to morbo
I just got it installed a few days ago and it was going full blast for a couple days and now its synching up at 32 down 5 up or 16 on each line. Should I post it in the att direct forum for help |
|
 whamelbillhamel DOT netPremium join:2002-05-09 Hinsdale, IL kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
| said by dweeb:I just got it installed a few days ago and it was going full blast for a couple days and now its synching up at 32 down 5 up or 16 on each line. Should I post it in the att direct forum for help
YES...same thing happened to me, was a problem with a faulty connection at pedestal and the existence of a bridge tap at 3 feet...the inital install tech didn't bother to see for bridge taps... -- Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | reply to Paralel
Line 2 is wonky again. Sigh... |
|
 | A line-tech, with physical access to the line, has a device that can reveal/plot existence/location of bridge-taps, right? (A device better than what a premises-tech has).
But regardless of limitations of specific RG model customer has, can ATT technical-service guys remotely "see" an equivalent of your bit-loading graph (without physical line access), thru data reported by the VRAD essentially (and not available to the customer)?
i.e. Can direct forum tech's see your lines' bit-loading (from WAN side) for diagnosis, regardless if customer can see it thru their RG? |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:2 | I would be very surprised if they took away the ability for remote technicians from being able to diagnose line issues. If anything I would think that they would add more abilities for remote technicians to diagnose line issues. Remember, U-Verse has had a history of issues plaguing their customer base when it comes to line issues so with that said, taking away diagnostic data would be a very stupid thing to do.
If anything, I think they may have taken away the ability to see in-depth line diagnostic data from us lowly users because every time we turn around we would say things like "oh, that line has a bridge tap" or "that line has major issues, go pester those guys in the direct forum". -- Tom Tom's Tech Blog |
|
 sloe join:2007-11-09 San Antonio, TX Reviews:
·ooma
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to brookeKrige
My buddy is a line tech in one of the local offices. He doesn't service my area, or else I'd not have the problems I'm having, but he did do some testing on my connections last week from his iPad. He sent me all the screen shots, and I'm sure one of them was a bit loading chart, but his iPad cut the resolution in half so I couldn't see any details of what any of the charts said.
Long story short - yes, the techs can see the details of any line as long as they have your BAN, or billing account number. |
|
 Xsk8er join:2001-01-02 Columbus, OH Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Insight Communic..
| said by sloe:Long story short - yes, the techs can see the details of any line as long as they have your BAN, or billing account number.
Correct - AT&T techs have access to way more data than the 589 or even the older RG 3600/3800/3801 ever reveal to the end user.
I am guessing the reasons the older RG's (2wire/pace 3800/3801) have more data is that's because the vendor created the firmware with more information provided to the end user.
While Motorola on the other hand did not with the 589. |
|
 | reply to Paralel
said by Paralel:Line 2 is wonky again. Sigh...
Dumb question... you go tug on the lines at the NID? Make sure your not dropping tip or ring?
I didn't get a pair secured well in the IDC connector and it was just touching so it caused what your seeing.
Might be in the xbox too... |
|
 dweeb join:2002-06-23 Ferndale, MI | reply to whamel
said by whamel:said by dweeb:I just got it installed a few days ago and it was going full blast for a couple days and now its synching up at 32 down 5 up or 16 on each line. Should I post it in the att direct forum for help
YES...same thing happened to me, was a problem with a faulty connection at pedestal and the existence of a bridge tap at 3 feet...the inital install tech didn't bother to see for bridge taps... Well they fixed it! Loving my uverse |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | At this point, everything from Ped to Gateway has been replaced and double checked, the ports for both lines were swapped but Pair 2 is still going to hell.
However, both lines pass SELT, so at this point it's hard to say if the pair is crap, or there is a larger issue at the X-Box/VRAD. I guess the next step will be to swap the physical copper for Pair 2 to another pair in the bundle.
I was told, according to the people inside AT&T, that our X-Box/VRAD are both saturated and should have been upgraded before now. So, this may be the source of the issue as well. If the physical change of pair fails, then I would have to assume it is inside the X-Box/VRAD and Engineering will have to deal with it. |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | I/R is coming out tomorrow to look at the copper. I guess if it looks okay, they will swap to another pair in the bundle? |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | I/R was here and found damage to the second pair four or five peds down at the corner of our street. Hopefully that will be the fix that was needed.
I have to say, I think AT&Ts idea of using an unconditioned second pair is going to fail. In situations like mine, the second pair will need to be worked on by a lineman, there just isn't any way around it in order to achieve acceptable results. Whoever thought they were going to get away with using a second pair that is unconditioned was fooling themselves, or selling someone above them a load of bologna. |
|
 | Sounds like you're having almost the same problem I am. I think they might have finally fixed my line 2 problem though, after about 3 months. I'm still unsure if it's 100% fixed but I haven't had a CRC error for about 3 days, that's a record for my line 2. Hopefully they won't take as long to fix your problem as they did mine. |
|
 Paralel join:2011-03-24 Michigan, US kudos:4 | said by MadClown:Sounds like you're having almost the same problem I am. I think they might have finally fixed my line 2 problem though, after about 3 months. I'm still unsure if it's 100% fixed but I haven't had a CRC error for about 3 days, that's a record for my line 2. Hopefully they won't take as long to fix your problem as they did mine. What ended up being the source of your issue? |
|
 | reply to brookeKrige
You can look at all the charts/graphs you want but when you have real problems they are only another tool, you need boots on the ground.The newer the outside plant(cable) the less problems and the older plant is a nightmare.
|
|