 bvierra join:2011-07-17 North Hollywood, CA | [Internet] IPv6 just appeared on my connection So my inet went down, go to look in the router settings and there it was, an IPv6 IP. Sure enough, I can ping -6 google.com with it as well. Looks like TWC is rolling out IPv6.
BTW I am in the Los Angeles area with the Arris modem on their 50Mbit plan  |
|
|
|
 | said by bvierra:So my inet went down, go to look in the router settings and there it was, an IPv6 IP. Sure enough, I can ping -6 google.com with it as well. Looks like TWC is rolling out IPv6.
BTW I am in the Los Angeles area with the Arris modem on their 50Mbit plan  hmm I just checked the SBG6580 that TWC gave me and it did not show an IPv6 address but test-ipv6.com is showing a 6to4 tunnel address that is using teredo a while back it was showing this and it stopped and now it is back to giving me a tunnel and I am able to ping the google IPv6 website |
|
 bvierra join:2011-07-17 North Hollywood, CA | Awe, it is no longer working. Can't even ping the gateway |
|
 bvierra join:2011-07-17 North Hollywood, CA | And it is back up, well it was right before I left for the office. |
|
 | reply to bvierra
IPv6 is a confusing mess. Does that mean I have to enable it on my Netgear router? |
|
 djrobxPremium join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA kudos:2 Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Verizon Wireless..
·Time Warner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to bvierra
I'm showing a Teredo tunnel and can ping ipv6 / lookup ipv6 addresses, but I have to specify -6 in the ping command or the DNS lookup fails (which breaks most test websites). Probably a config issue on my end, but the actual ipv6 connectivity seems to work.
-- Rob -- AT&T U-Hearse - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011 Rethink Billable.
|
|
 Elyria join:2011-10-12 Elyria, OH | reply to tonyram57
It gives AOLer's practicing being all l33t , a new topic to get all hard over. |
|
 NormanSI gave her time to steal my mind awayPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 | reply to tonyram57
said by tonyram57:IPv6 is a confusing mess. Does that mean I have to enable it on my Netgear router? AFAIK, you still have to enable it in the router (if available there) and, possibly, the computer (Windows XP is off by default, Windows 7 may be off if you followed some online guides for optimization).
You will also need to know if TWC is using 6to4, 6in4 (they are different), 6rd, DHCP-PD (listed in my router), or something else.
My older D-Link DIR-655 (Rev.A2) doesn't have IPv6 configuration, but supposedly can pass Protocol 41 for setting up a 6in4 tunnel. The newer ASUS RT-AC66U can establish a 6in4 tunnel.
Tracing route to www.google.com [2607:f8b0:4005:800::1011]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 8 ms 8 ms Chihiro [2001:470:1f05:448::1]
2 27 ms 33 ms 35 ms NKonaya-1.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [2001:470:1f04:448::1]
3 39 ms 27 ms 24 ms gige-g5-19.core1.fmt2.he.net [2001:470:0:45::1]
4 37 ms 27 ms 38 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.sjc2.he.net [2001:470:0:31::2]
5 36 ms 34 ms 34 ms 2001:4860:1:1:0:1b1b:0:9
6 23 ms 27 ms 28 ms 2001:4860::1:0:7ea
7 26 ms 24 ms 40 ms 2001:4860:0:1::691
8 28 ms 29 ms 30 ms nuq05s01-in-x11.1e100.net [2607:f8b0:4005:800::1011]
Trace complete.
-- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | said by NormanS:You will also need to know if TWC is using 6to4, 6in4 (they are different), 6rd, DHCP-PD (listed in my router), or something else. Well the OP was specifically referring to native service which would mean having equipment supporting DHCPv6 / DHCPv6-PD. |
|
 NormanSI gave her time to steal my mind awayPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:9 | Even so, the router must support it, and be configured for it. |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | said by NormanS:Even so, the router must support it, and be configured for it. Not much of an issue... now to see TWC finally roll this out across their whole footprint. |
|
 | reply to bvierra
My router is now pulling an IPv6 address, but it's only a /128 and so my LAN computers aren't getting anything. I need to poke a bit more...
2605:e000:7fc0:4a:7451:xxxx:yyyy:zzzz/128
/M |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | Where are you located? Is your router also setup for DHCPv6-PD? |
|
 1 edit | Los Angeles
And yes, it's set for DHCPv6-PD.
/M |
|
 1 edit | As I suspected, I just needed to reboot everything. DHCP-PD now gives me 2605:e000:1412:8xyz::/64 for my LAN.
traceroute6 ipv6.google.com traceroute to ipv6.google.com (2607:f8b0:4005:802::1014), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 <snip my router> 0.354 ms 0.116 ms 0.277 ms 2 * * * 3 2605:e000:0:4::5:209 (2605:e000:0:4::5:209) 16.174 ms 16.888 ms 16.710 ms 4 2605:e000:0:4::5:b0 (2605:e000:0:4::5:b0) 18.513 ms 19.285 ms 19.092 ms 5 2605:e000:0:4::40 (2605:e000:0:4::40) 16.811 ms 16.635 ms 16.431 ms 6 2001:1998:0:8::86 (2001:1998:0:8::86) 18.249 ms 12.613 ms 17.348 ms 7 2001:1998::66:109:6:133 (2001:1998::66:109:6:133) 17.051 ms 2001:1998:0:4::56 (2001:1998:0:4::56) 15.687 ms 16.539 ms 8 2610:18:10d:8000::5 (2610:18:10d:8000::5) 84.097 ms 2610:18:10d:8000::45 (2610:18:10d:8000::45) 83.916 ms 2610:18:10d:8000::31 (2610:18:10d:8000::31) 82.677 ms 9 * * * 10 2610:18::2074 (2610:18::2074) 89.306 ms 89.060 ms 83.973 ms 11 2001:4860:1:1:0:b0c:0:1 (2001:4860:1:1:0:b0c:0:1) 86.508 ms 91.506 ms 92.299 ms 12 2001:4860::1:0:7ea (2001:4860::1:0:7ea) 27.666 ms 21.980 ms 22.194 ms 13 2001:4860:0:1::693 (2001:4860:0:1::693) 22.551 ms 27.808 ms 28.568 ms 14 2607:f8b0:8000:2a::b (2607:f8b0:8000:2a::b) 68.521 ms 73.652 ms 2607:f8b0:8000:2a::5 (2607:f8b0:8000:2a::5) 75.388 ms
ping6 -c 10 ipv6.google.com PING ipv6.google.com(nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=19.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=19.4 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=19.9 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=19.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=19.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=19.6 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=19.3 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=19.9 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=19.9 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-x14.1e100.net: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=19.6 ms
--- ipv6.google.com ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.368/19.654/19.978/0.217 ms
The IPv4 google for reference: ping -c 10 google.com PING google.com (74.125.239.142) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=20.0 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=20.4 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=20.3 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=20.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=20.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=21.0 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=18.8 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=19.0 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=18.5 ms 64 bytes from nuq05s02-in-f14.1e100.net (74.125.239.142): icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=18.8 ms
--- google.com ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 18.578/19.835/21.044/0.880 ms
/M |
|
 | mtr -c60 --report{,-wide} ipv6.google.com
Start: Thu Aug 1 18:59:30 2013
HOST: localhost.localdomain Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 2605:e000:1412:8<snip my router> 0.0% 60 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0
2.|-- ??? 100.0 60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::5:209 0.0% 60 10.9 10.2 7.9 23.8 2.8
4.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::5:b0 0.0% 60 10.8 11.5 7.5 17.6 1.6
5.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::40 0.0% 60 13.4 12.0 8.8 15.7 1.6
6.|-- 2001:1998:0:8::82 1.7% 60 14.5 12.6 9.1 20.0 2.1
7.|-- 2001:1998::66:109:6:133 0.0% 60 9.8 11.5 8.8 60.8 6.7
8.|-- 2610:18:10d:8000::65 0.0% 60 77.1 81.9 76.5 133.3 11.9
9.|-- ??? 100.0 60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.|-- 2610:18::2074 0.0% 60 84.3 87.4 83.1 136.0 8.4
11.|-- 2001:4860:1:1:0:b0c:0:1 0.0% 60 90.2 91.0 82.8 148.5 12.0
12.|-- 2001:4860::1:0:7ea 0.0% 60 29.1 29.5 19.6 53.3 9.5
13.|-- 2001:4860:0:1::693 0.0% 60 20.5 22.7 20.0 42.1 3.9
14.|-- nuq05s02-in-x11.1e100.net 0.0% 60 21.9 21.6 19.4 30.0 2.0
mtr -c60 --report{,-wide} google.com
Start: Thu Aug 1 19:01:33 2013
HOST: localhost.localdomain Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 2605:e000:1412:8<snip my router> 0.0% 60 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0
2.|-- ??? 100.0 60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::5:209 0.0% 60 8.3 9.4 7.8 11.4 0.7
4.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::5:b0 0.0% 60 12.6 11.3 8.7 15.5 1.5
5.|-- 2605:e000:0:4::40 1.7% 60 12.9 12.5 9.4 25.4 2.5
6.|-- 2001:1998:0:8::86 3.3% 60 15.5 12.5 9.2 18.0 1.9
7.|-- 2001:1998:0:4::56 0.0% 60 10.5 12.4 8.8 70.6 8.0
8.|-- 2610:18:10d:8000::61 0.0% 60 77.2 79.1 76.9 91.9 3.0
9.|-- ??? 100.0 60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.|-- 2610:18::2074 0.0% 60 84.5 88.7 83.4 113.1 6.7
11.|-- 2001:4860:1:1:0:b0c:0:1 0.0% 60 83.5 85.8 83.1 131.5 6.2
12.|-- 2001:4860::1:0:7ea 0.0% 60 21.8 22.6 19.5 36.6 2.7
13.|-- 2001:4860:0:1::693 0.0% 60 21.1 21.9 19.8 23.8 0.7
14.|-- nuq05s02-in-x04.1e100.net 0.0% 60 22.9 21.6 19.5 34.2 2.1
And the v4 again for comparison:
mtr -c60 --report{,-wide} -4 google.com
Start: Thu Aug 1 19:04:54 2013
HOST: localhost.localdomain Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.10.254 0.0% 60 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0
2.|-- cpe-172-248-208-1.socal.res.rr.com 0.0% 60 89.2 38.9 11.8 143.4 28.1
3.|-- tge0-7-0-4.vnnzca24-cer02.socal.rr.com 0.0% 60 9.2 9.9 7.4 21.4 2.3
4.|-- agg11.vnnycajz-ccr02.socal.rr.com 0.0% 60 14.0 11.4 7.5 19.4 2.2
5.|-- agg29.tustcaft-ccr01.socal.rr.com 0.0% 60 13.3 13.7 10.7 22.1 2.1
6.|-- ae-6-0.cr0.lax30.tbone.rr.com 0.0% 60 12.2 14.3 10.3 27.9 3.0
7.|-- ae-1-0.pr0.lax10.tbone.rr.com 0.0% 60 10.2 13.2 9.6 58.4 7.0
8.|-- 72.14.198.73 78.3% 60 21.4 22.4 19.1 28.5 2.5
9.|-- 216.239.46.40 0.0% 60 19.1 25.2 17.9 94.7 14.6
10.|-- 64.233.174.190 0.0% 60 18.4 21.0 18.4 41.9 3.9
| `|-- 64.233.174.186
11.|-- 64.233.174.205 0.0% 60 20.2 20.7 18.0 29.8 2.5
| `|-- 64.233.174.207
12.|-- 209.85.250.62 0.0% 60 30.9 23.1 17.9 37.7 4.5
| `|-- 209.85.250.67
13.|-- 66.249.95.31 0.0% 60 22.4 21.0 18.4 33.5 2.9
14.|-- nuq05s02-in-f7.1e100.net 0.0% 60 19.7 20.1 18.0 32.7 2.2
/M |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | Curious why you're using ipv6.google.com when you can just use www.google.com?
Here is hoping that TWC will continue rolling out service in their other markets.
Anyone notice v6 active in other states? |
|
 | Mainly old habit, but it also ensures that IPv6 is used (no chance of getting an A record by mistake).
/M |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | You might want to check out the Firefox add-on Sixornot. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden : Off topic hidden : Off topic hidden : Friendly delete
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | reply to bvierra
Re: [Internet] IPv6 just appeared on my connection Hrmm. So I see service is up and running in parts of California, Texas and I think New York. Anyone noticing service active anywhere else? |
|
 | Unlike my compatriot in Elyria, I would love to see ipv6 hit the NE Ohio area. OTOH, my current firewall isn't capable (pfsense v2.0.x), but that is coming soon once 2.1 hits final...  |
|
 | reply to bvierra
How do you go about enabling it on a Netgear WNDR4300 router? Do you just choose automatic? Very confusing. |
|
 Emiya join:2006-03-30 Southington, OH | reply to bradenmcg
2.1 RC1 is very stable already. That aside, I'm in NEO and am not showing IPV6 on my modem. |
|
 hawk82 join:2001-04-26 Oakland, ME 1 edit | reply to bvierra
Does anyone know how IPv6 addresses are delivered to TWC end users? Is it via DHCP6, SLAAC, 6rd Tunnel, 6to4 Tunnel, or Track Interface?
I'm using pfSense 2.1 beta with Biz Class service, no static addresses, and a Cisco DPC2100R2 modem. Currently am using a HE tunnel, but would drop it if TWC's IPv6 works good. I see a gateway address of "2002:c058:6301::" on the WAN interface if it set it up as DHCP6 or 6to4 tunnel. Not sure what that means since the address isn't complete. |
|
 | reply to bvierra
'Native with DHCP-PD' is what I choose in my RT-N66U to get an IPv6 address. |
|
 | reply to tonyram57
Yes, 'Auto' should work fine. At least my D-Link DIR-825 likes it just fine 
/M |
|
 | reply to hawk82
said by hawk82:Does anyone know how IPv6 addresses are delivered to TWC end users?
address of "2002:c058:6301::" on the WAN interface TWC uses DHCPv6 with the DHCP-PD option.
That address is for automatic 6to4 tunneling; it means you do not have IPv6 from TWC.
/M |
|