dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
6
quesix
join:2005-12-19
Cary, IL
ARRIS SB6141
Cisco 2851
Asus RT-AC66

quesix to kennocha

Member

to kennocha

Re: [Connectivity] Chicago Routing Issues

yep, looks like saturated link to me. with Tata Communications (as6453.net on your tracert) in Chicago. AT&T Chicago links directly with NTT, while comcast route goes thru as6453.net. The posting about "peering" issues on reddit are correct. Even AT&T has saturated links from time to time in Chicago.
kennocha
join:2013-08-06
Wyoming, MI

kennocha

Member

Any way to get someone involved to get it sorted out? This is a fairly big issue for my server to be unable to be reached by comcast users at these times.
34764170 (banned)
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

34764170 (banned)

Member

Comcast is known for having their transit ports to TATA being saturated and this is far from a new issue.

depster
join:2001-06-07
Grand Rapids, MI

depster to kennocha

Member

to kennocha
You're likely to have better results by moving your server.

SpaethCo
Digital Plumber
MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

SpaethCo to 34764170

MVM

to 34764170
said by 34764170:

Comcast is known for having their transit ports to TATA being saturated and this is far from a new issue.

Having to chart these issues for ~80k VPN users at work, I can tell you there is congestion between TATA and Verizon, TATA and Centurylink, TATA and TimeWarner, TATA and Comcast.

There's a commonality there that is not simply Comcast running their connections hot.

I colo servers for personal/non-profit use in Chicago and Dallas, and I've had to play these games with moving my servers because the DCs had carriers that ended up using TATA as intermediate transit to Comcast & TWC folks.

It sucks, and sadly it's not going to get better anytime soon.
34764170 (banned)
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

34764170 (banned)

Member

said by SpaethCo:

Having to chart these issues for ~80k VPN users at work, I can tell you there is congestion between TATA and Verizon, TATA and Centurylink, TATA and TimeWarner, TATA and Comcast.

There's a commonality there that is not simply Comcast running their connections hot.

There is a commonality there but all of those connections are not the same. TATA is a transit provider for Comcast so they have complete control over when and where upgrades are made. The rest are peering with each other. Having peering links upgraded is a much trickier situation with all too often politics involved. and yes it is simply Comcast running their connections hot.
said by SpaethCo:

It sucks, and sadly it's not going to get better anytime soon.

Of course it isn't because Comcast is greedy.

JasonOD
@comcast.net

JasonOD

Anon

said by 34764170:

said by SpaethCo:

It sucks, and sadly it's not going to get better anytime soon.

Of course it isn't because Comcast is greedy.

Yeah right, nevermind the fact that big C has dumped way more than any other cableco improving their network..... It sounds like they need a better transit provider, something that's easier said than done, especially in bandwidth hungry major market areas like I'd imagine Chicago is.
34764170 (banned)
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

34764170 (banned)

Member

said by JasonOD :

Yeah right, nevermind the fact that big C has dumped way more than any other cableco improving their network..... It sounds like they need a better transit provider, something that's easier said than done, especially in bandwidth hungry major market areas like I'd imagine Chicago is.

It's your choice if you want to be ignorant or not.