dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
1247
share rss forum feed view:
normal


Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
reply to Thingamajig

Re: Why is the speed limit in Canada on highways only 100 kph?

said by Thingamajig:

Comparing driving from the 60's & 70's compared to today is nonsense. Vehicles from the 40's & 50's were still common place on the roads. Standard non-synchronized transmissions, low horsepower, awful brakes were the norm in those big old boats. Anyone with half a brain knew they were putting themselves in jeopardy driving too fast.
My pickup truck rides better than any of those old boats did in their prime.

And yet, speed limits were higher. Today is absolutely no different as the vast majority of people out there know they're putting their lives in jeopardy by driving too fast just like people did in the 60s and 70s.

Logic? There is none.


Hydraglass
Premium
join:2002-05-08
Kingston, ON
reply to willzzz

As far as I'm concerned, as long as they keep the 105 speed limiters on transports, my 120km each way each day drive on 401 (where it's only 2 lanes each way) needs a speed limit no higher than 110 and it'll meet the 85th... the traffic has slowed so much since the speed limiters came on the trucks, that except for friday nights and sunday afternoons, almost no one goes over 115 now - most go 109-112. I drive with my cruise set at 110 to and from work each day and I only get passed by a few vehicles in 120km drive. So often 2 transports drive "side on" for 5-10 km (bound to happen when both of their limiters are set so close it's silly 104.9 km/hr vs 105 km/hr means it takes 15 minutes to cover the 100 feet they need to pass) where everyone is forced to go at 105, that in normal daily driving people don't go much faster than 110 or so now as all that happens is you catch up to trucks and have to wait forever to pass.

On the other hand there are MANY rural 2 lanes in central/eastern ON that need to be 90km/hr that it's not funny... even most US rural 2 lanes are 55mph (90kmh).



Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..

If you go down into the Southern US rural two lane highways are 120.

But yeah, Toronto is an entirely different beast. You could post at 110 in the GTA and it wouldn't be much of an issue. Outside of there and on the 407 anything less than 120 and you're turning the majority of drivers into law breakers.


jaberi

join:2010-08-13
reply to zod5000

even an RCMP officer wanted to ride fast on highway 1 and put the pedal to the metal...

"Const. Michael Milo Arbulic, 38, faces a charge of excessive speed under the Motor Vehicle Act for driving more than 40 kilometres an hour over the posted speed limit on Highway 1 while off duty on Feb. 14 this year.


monsoon66

join:2007-01-13
Toronto, ON
reply to willzzz

In the summer, if you're driving back at night from Niagara Falls or the border along the QEW you'll notice that traffic is usually flying well above 120kph prior to hitting Oakville. I remember on one of my last trips a few weeks back I was doing about 125 in the middle and people were still flying past in the left lane.

I think speed limits are fine the way they are. There are too many bad drivers out there these days, and when it rains or snows people don't lower their speed as it is.

Also, most of your typical budget, family sedans don't hold the road too well over 130. Go over 130 and you'll feel the car start to dance around over every little bump.



urbanriot
Premium
join:2004-10-18
Canada
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Cogeco Cable

1 recommendation

said by monsoon66:

There are too many bad drivers out there these days, and when it rains or snows people don't lower their speed as it is.

Strange, you're the second person to suggest that speed doesn't fluctuate based on conditions yet I encounter an entirely different reality.

Last winter, some time on a Friday, we had a 'storm' that caused some people to try and get out of work yet it wasn't a big deal until the evening... in any case, the south bound QEW from Burlington to Niagara Falls was moving at about 60 KM/h.


Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..

said by urbanriot:

Strange, you're the second person to suggest that speed doesn't fluctuate based on conditions yet I encounter an entirely different reality.

I think it's because there is a subset of people who think the speed limit means that is the speed you are required to drive at all times, versus being the maximum speed you can drive at under ideal conditions.


zirG

join:2012-12-18
Ridgeway, ON
reply to willzzz

We've heard about examples of much higher speed limits in the US. I wonder, are there examples of speed limits of 120 or more in high density metropolitan areas with frequent interchanges? Much of my objection applies to places like the 401 through the GTA or most of the QEW. Are there any examples like this in the US?

I can see raising limits on appropriate sections of the 401, for example between Belleville and Kingston, or London-Chatham. I don't necessarily disagree with that. I want to know if these comparisons to the US are "apples and apples".

Lets stick to 4 lane or more divided highways for now.


Viper359
Premium
join:2006-09-17
Scarborough, ON
Reviews:
·voip.ms

1 recommendation

reply to Gone

Gone: On the first page you posted about the MPH/KPH speeds way back when. Its funny for me, as I remember as a child in the 80's my father and uncle arguing over when the switch was made, and what the limits where. Thanks for bringing back a memory, because it was a good one. They fought for an hour, or so it feels like that in my memory.

I think the 400 series should stay at 100. Lets be honest, the unwritten limit is 120. I spend most of my working day zipping around the GTA. In 15 years, never had an OPP officer even look at me when driving the 120. I have seen some mornings around 6am, where people are driving 130+ into the city. If they set the limit at 120, you could do 130 before getting a ticket, in most cases, and 140 would barely be a ticket. I think those speeds, and the poor driving skills of a segment of people today, are a recipe for disaster.

I would rather see the OPP start enforcing unsafe driving laws, such as those who decide to merge with traffic doing 100, at 60-80. Seems lost on people, ramps onto a hi-way are like airport runways. Get your vehicle to the speed of traffic, and then merge safely. However, I am dreaming. Since, most times, I can travel from Whitby to the airport and never see an OPP car. I know sometimes, several days can pass before I see a copper on the hi-way, while working 10 hour days, driving the hi-ways. They just don't have the man power on the hi-ways.


Gershom 1624
Time Waster

join:2013-03-10
BriscoCounty
Reviews:
·callwithus
·Callcentric
reply to zirG

said by zirG:

We've heard about examples of much higher speed limits in the US. I wonder, are there examples of speed limits of 120 or more in high density metropolitan areas with frequent interchanges?

If you look at the ultra-high speeds in the US, they are mainly in rural areas and in states which are pretty rural as a whole.

Some rural Texas and Utah highways are at 80 mph (129 kph).

There is even an 85 mph (137 kph) limit on a toll road in Texas.
»www.autoblog.com/2012/09/10/texa···d-limit/

Now in major US metropolitan areas, the roads are so congested and often so physically obsolete that the speed limit becomes rather irrelevant.

There are exceptions....

In Michigan most freeways/expressways are at 70 mph (113 kph) but there is currently a proposal to raise that to at least 75 mph (120 kph). In urban areas the posted speed currently varies from 55-70 mph (88-113 kph) and that might not change.

Most of the urban Interstates were built a long time ago.


BonezX
Basement Dweller
Premium
join:2004-04-13
Canada
kudos:1
reply to Gone

said by Gone:

said by urbanriot:

Strange, you're the second person to suggest that speed doesn't fluctuate based on conditions yet I encounter an entirely different reality.

I think it's because there is a subset of people who think the speed limit means that is the speed you are required to drive at all times, versus being the maximum speed you can drive at under ideal conditions.

they are usually the ones that cause an X car pileup, or wind up in a ditch.

also the same type that run all season tires and drive in whiteout conditions. "well my car as awd/4wd i can drive as fast as i want" type reasoning, too bad for them friction doesn't work that way.


Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
reply to Viper359

said by Viper359:

If they set the limit at 120, you could do 130 before getting a ticket, in most cases, and 140 would barely be a ticket. I think those speeds, and the poor driving skills of a segment of people today, are a recipe for disaster.

Not true. Nothing would change. All that would happen is that people who are breaking the law by driving safely today would no longer be breaking the law. If you are so hell bent on having the police enforce laws related to actual highway safety, why do you advocate allowing the police to lay charges against people who are driving safely as a means to fill a quota at the end of the month?

You know, I really find it amusing how *every* single argument in favour of keeping the speed limits artificially low like they are now is based on nothing more than what amounts to an old wives tale. People don't drive faster when speed limits are increased. Accident rates don't go up. The status quo is not acceptable. To quote Margaret Thatcher, "No! No! No!" All that happens when speed limits are increased is that people who are safe, competent drivers doing what they have been doing safely for decades of their lives are no longer breaking the law for continuing to do what they've always done. How is this a bad thing? I challenge any one of to bring up a valid argument with accompanying empirical evidence to argue against raising the limit. So far, all of the arguments here have been nothing short of pathetic.


shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB

1 recommendation

reply to willzzz

Had my 16 year old out driving the other morning. He does okay, but he did quite clearly go through a red light at one point. Why? Because he was preoccupied with the speedometer making sure he wasn't going over 60kph.

I told him to not worry about the speed limit and just drive at a comfortable speed that felt right to him. Meanwhile, I await the $300 red light ticket in the mail caused by having a limit so low, a new driver was actually distracted from driving.
--
I'm a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess.

»shaner38.blogspot.com/


Viper359
Premium
join:2006-09-17
Scarborough, ON
Reviews:
·voip.ms

1 recommendation

reply to Gone

My evidence is if you give someone an inch, they try and take a foot. Speeding tickets are not even issued until you are ten over the limit, so raising it to 120, means, a person can do 130.

All you are doing is making generalized assumptions as well. I love how you say those "breaking the law by driving safely today" Sorry, I drive for a living, a small minority of those breaking the law, are doing it safely. Very few of those pissed off Caravan driving dads have two hands on the wheel, both eyes forward, while ripping past me at 130.

I challenge you to show any truth to your statements, with accompanying empirical evidence. Until you do, its nothing more than an opinion like mine. Try laying off the I know everything attitude. It gets quiet annoying.


mr weather
Premium
join:2002-02-27
Mississauga, ON
reply to willzzz

Not sure what was going on along the 401 through London yesterday but the OPP were like flies on shit. Saw at least half a dozen cars pulled over between just east of Airport Road and the Putnam scales.
--
"It's all coming down!!" - Mike Holmes



loosedobbs

join:2006-06-13
Toronto

said by mr weather:

Not sure what was going on along the 401 through London yesterday but the OPP were like flies on shit. Saw at least half a dozen cars pulled over between just east of Airport Road and the Putnam scales.

Month end. Filling up the quota I guess.


Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
reply to Viper359

said by Viper359:

My evidence is if you give someone an inch, they try and take a foot.

That's not evidence, that's conjecture. The actual empirical evidence obtain from jurisdictions where they have increased speed limits proves your conjecture completely wrong.

As for some of that empirical evidence:

said by »www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=8401437 :
When the limit was posted at 75, UDOT said drivers averaged 81 to 85 miles an hour. But with the speed limit now at 80, the agency finds the average driver still does not go above 85.

UDOT also says it has not seen an increase in accidents along those two stretches.
If American data being reported on the news isn't good enough for you, check out »www.tac-atc.ca/english/resourcec···hunt.pdf from when Saskatchewan increased their speed limit from 100 to 110 and go to Page 6. They experienced an increase in the 85th percentile traffic flow of a whole whopping 4KM/h, despite the limit increasing by 10. So much for that inch turning into a mile, eh?

There. You've got two sources of data. Now it's your turn. Good luck!


shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB
reply to Thingamajig

said by Thingamajig:

A B.C perspective. Applies nationally for the most part.

(youtube clip)

Seems this video may have caught the attention of the BC government.

»www.theglobeandmail.com/news/bri···=twitter
--
I'm a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess.

»shaner38.blogspot.com/


FiReSTaRT
Premium
join:2010-02-26
Canada
Reviews:
·Velcom

1) Because our speed limits are set by politicians and not by qualified individuals

2) To make the limits so unreasonable that most people will violate them, which means that highway robbery is like shooting fish in a barrel

3) To make foreign transportation engineers laugh

4) To make our transportation engineers cry

5) To stop people from leaving the home, thus boosting our home entertainment industry

6) To create more congestion, which burns more fuel, boosts Alberta's economy and contributes to global warming, thus improving the weather up here

Should I go on?
--
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.
—George Bernard Shaw

Expand your moderator at work


Ron

@rogers.com
reply to FiReSTaRT

Re: Why is the speed limit in Canada on highways only 100 kph?

6) To create more congestion, which burns more fuel, boosts Alberta's economy and contributes to global warming, thus improving the weather up here

How is raising the speed limit going to relieve congestion? Congestion is caused by too many cars on our roads, or am I missing your point.
Going faster increases fuel consumption.



FiReSTaRT
Premium
join:2010-02-26
Canada
Reviews:
·Velcom


said by Ron :

How is raising the speed limit going to relieve congestion? Congestion is caused by too many cars on our roads, or am I missing your point.
Going faster increases fuel consumption.

Going faster gets them off the road quicker, so fewer cars are on the road at the same time. It's a bandaid because we're too chickenshit to properly deal with the infrastructure issues and to say "no" to the developers, but it's a proven fact that it helps. You burn a lot more fuel per mile just sitting and idling while waiting to move
--
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.
—George Bernard Shaw

Gershom 1624
Time Waster

join:2013-03-10
BriscoCounty
Reviews:
·callwithus
·Callcentric

said by FiReSTaRT:

Going faster gets them off the road quicker, so fewer cars are on the road at the same time.

I dunno. The same total number of cars will be travelling on a road on any given day....

It's a hard concept to wrap one's head around.

-----

But speaking of congestion and speed limits, here's a weird thing:

Some US areas are introducing variable speed limits, fluctuating based on traffic congestion:
»www.wsdot.wa.gov/smarterhighways/vsl.htm

I sure can't figure [that] out either.

AND it turns out (surprise) that drivers just ignore them:
»www.kare11.com/news/article/1041···it-signs


zirG

join:2012-12-18
Ridgeway, ON

I mentioned variable speed limits earlier. They make sense in theory. Lot's of silly things make sense... in theory.



Gone
Premium
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
reply to Gershom 1624

Ontario has had legislation to allow for variable speed limits for almost ten years now. They've just never been implemented as intended. Instead, the legislation ends up getting used in construction zones where a road contractor can change the speed limit (with proper legally-enforced white signs, not the orange signs that look like speed limit signs but have no force in law) based on the work being performed rather than requiring a regulation to be passed by cabinet each and every time they want it changed.

Actual variable speed limits are something I doubt we will see any time soon.



FiReSTaRT
Premium
join:2010-02-26
Canada
Reviews:
·Velcom
reply to Gershom 1624

said by Gershom 1624:

dunno. The same total number of cars will be travelling on a road on any given day....

Increase the resolution of that and you will notice that many of those cars will be spending less time on the road, so by the time the others come out, these will already be gone. So the speed limit increase would reduce the number of cars on the road at the same time.w

It would just be a BANDAID solution, but since we're building up the city and not doing anything to improve the infrastructure, at least it's ONE positive step (out of many that should be taken).
--
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.
—George Bernard Shaw