 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | High ISO Sports Photos I've moved in to shooting college sports this year. I'm having issues with football night games. I'm trying to limit my shooting to 1600 but to reduce blue I'm having to shoot 3200 some times. No matter what though if its above 800 I cant get the noise reduction to look right with out killing all the detail.
Heres an example: »www.goherd.com/images/galleries/···0647.jpg
Heres what the other photog is getting: »www.goherd.com/media/k2/items/ca···e_XL.jpg He uses a 300mm lens with a nikon d3 I believe
Any thoughts or suggestions on what I can do?
My workflow is pretty straight forward. Canon T3i with a 70-200 2.8l lens -> I shoot raw -> lightroom -> reduce images to top 100 or so 1 star for web gallery -> then 2 star photos go to our print magazine -> photoshop to change color standard to cmyk
During the day my shots are coming out pretty good. I do think I need a longer range lens too though. I'm thinking about the 28-300L 3.5
Thanks for the help/advice.
Alex |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 2 edits | Use flash if you are allowed.
If the noise is mostly in the background, make a duplicate and clean image. Layer it on top of the un-cleaned image and erase what you don't need to clean, then merge the two. Don't do any sharpening before you remove noise. Make sure you get your exposure right in the camera, doing so in software brings up more noise. |
|
 nklbPremium join:2000-11-17 Ann Arbor, MI kudos:2 | reply to LiVE4594
For them to look like that, you are either REALLY underexposing, or you are cropping them too much.
It may sound counter-intuitive, but you may actually need a higher ISO to get your exposure where it needs to be.
If you are cropping them heavily, then you need a lens with longer reach.
It's hard to say for sure, but it also looks like the focal point is behind the players. |
|
|
|
 bfreasPremium join:2001-06-16 Franklin, KY | reply to LiVE4594
I'd say you may want to look at a different body that gives better high ISO results. Maybe a 6D and a 1.4 teleconverter. The full frame camera will give you a wider shot at the short end of the lens (won't get you to 28 mm but you'd be surprised). The 28-300L has a maximum aperture of 5.6 on the 300 mm end and will be almost useless at night for long shots. -- "The world is big and I want to have a good look at it before it gets dark." John Muir |
|
 | reply to LiVE4594
I'm agreeing with bfreas. It's likely the body and it's ability to handle noise at higher ISOs.
I was at the Alabama / VT game and had front row seats in the end zone. When the game wasn't going on I was watching what all of the Photographers were doing. The over whelming majority were shooting with Nikon D4s or Canon 1Ds. Almost everyone with a D4/1D had a D700 or D7100 (or the Canon counterpart) with a smaller lens. -- I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company. |
|
 nklbPremium join:2000-11-17 Ann Arbor, MI kudos:2 | reply to LiVE4594
Is there any chance you could share a jpeg right out of the camera from one of these shots? It would be helpful to be able to see all the exif data of the settings used to take it. That camera and lens combination should be able to take much better photos than that, even in somewhat low light. |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH
2 recommendations | I can post one of the raw files. I'll do that when I get to work.
To everyone else. Thanks for the feedback. I am kind of stuck with the body at the moment. I'm just trying to get the best shot I can with what I have. I have been cropping the images but the one I shared is not cropped very much at all.
Here are the rest of the images from that one game.
»www.goherd.com/football/1656-gar···-gallery |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | reply to LiVE4594
I may rent a 5d and see what that gets me with the 70-200 lens. If its dramatically better, then I may have to bite the bullet and switch. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | Are you shooting in AI Servo or one shot, if not have you tried AI Servo? Have you checked to see that your focus is spot on? You can check this on the raw files. |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | I've tried both. I have left it in ai servo and gotten same results. I've not checked focus to make sure its accurate. |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | All my other images, especially during the day, look fine. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | At this point I'm thinking it is a focus issue. I don't think entry level cameras were designed for tough jobs like night sports. You might also try the Canon 7d. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | reply to LiVE4594
I just looked at the file again, and it has a red color cast. You can fix that in a photo program and it will improve your file somewhat. Try a grey card the next time you shoot.
I have a canon 7d and in low light, it shoots with a color cast in all ISO's when the white balance is on auto, so I have to correct for a blue or green color cast. I'm not sure how the full frame cameras handle color for low light. |
|
 bfreasPremium join:2001-06-16 Franklin, KY
2 recommendations | reply to LiVE4594
What software are you using for noise reduction? Here's the image from the first link using Topaz Denoise, a levels adjustment to make the blacks black and a curves adjustment to fix the red cast. Couldn't get rid of some of the JPEG artifacts in the sky without killing detail, but if you can post the RAW of this image it should give much better results. -- "The world is big and I want to have a good look at it before it gets dark." John Muir |
|
 DavisPhotogFlyingphotogPremium,MVM join:2001-08-26 Rohnert Park, CA | reply to bfreas
said by bfreas:I'd say you may want to look at a different body that gives better high ISO results. Maybe a 6D and a 1.4 teleconverter. The full frame camera will give you a wider shot at the short end of the lens (won't get you to 28 mm but you'd be surprised). The 28-300L has a maximum aperture of 5.6 on the 300 mm end and will be almost useless at night for long shots.
Honestly this is about the best you can do. Need to shoot with a body that offers better low-light performance.... |
|
 richdelbGo Hawks GoPremium join:2003-01-22 Algonquin, IL | reply to LiVE4594 I ran a levels adjustment and just brought the blacks up. Then ran it through the Noiseware" plugin using the "night scene" preset. Finally applied a High Pass filter to sharpen. (Filter - Other - High Pass - .5 pixels and then used overlay mode)
It cleaned up rather nicely, I think. Overall, your issue is the camera body. The t3i has quite a bit of noise past 800 ISO to me. Sometimes you can go to 1600, but I think with that body 3200 is just too much.
just my 2 cents. |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | reply to LiVE4594
I think I will upgrade to the 7d and see where I'm at.
In the mean time, I'll try that software.
Thanks for the feedback and help! |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | said by LiVE4594:I think I will upgrade to the 7d and see where I'm at.
They take some time to learn. |
|
 ExitPremium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-04-10 Canada | reply to LiVE4594
said by LiVE4594:I think I will upgrade to the 7d and see where I'm at.
In the mean time, I'll try that software.
Thanks for the feedback and help!
Skip the 7D and get a 6D or used 5d3. The 7D's ISO performance sucks.
You could probably do without the noise reduction if you expose properly. I shoot indoor/night sports all the time at ISO3200-12800 and they don't need any noise reduction |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | Can you expand on the exposing issue? I must be missing something. I shoot weddings regularly and have no issues when I can control the lighting(somewhat) my shooting of sports has been horrible. I can not get decent results when shooting 800+ on my t3i.
I'm going to rent a 6d and try it out next week. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | When you expose your images correctly you have less noise. Should they be underexposed and you need to use curves to adjust you will see more noise. Probably true with all Canon cameras, but the full frame cameras seem to be more forgiving. |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | I do shoot manual at the games and always make sure my exposure is pretty set. Which is why I have to use 800-1600, but my noise is just really bad on it. I look at some of my colleagues and they are shooting with much more expensive cameras but I feel like I should be able to get near that quality. Maybe I'm expecting too much. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 1 edit | Although I shoot Canon, I think the Nikons are ahead of Canon with the issue of noise. I would say a low end Canon will not come close to a high end Nikon. This is my opinion from files I have seen. The more you crop the more noise you will see, and this applies to both crop and full frame cameras
I do think you can find a Canon that will work for you, as many folks shoot sports with Canon. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | reply to LiVE4594
 Canon EOS 7D 220mm 1/80th F5 ISO5000
|  Canon EOS 7D 220mm 1/80th F5 ISO5000
|
Here is an image I shot a couple of days ago, along with a 100% crop. Exif intact. Viewed at 50% the noise is hardly visible. The light was low and it was late in the day. The shutter was also slow and it was handheld, so not as sharp as I would like. I can process this and print 8x10 photos and they will be fine. For me processing would be a slight curves adjustment, noise image software, and sharpening after noise reduction.
This is a converted jpeg from DPP |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 1 edit
1 recommendation | reply to LiVE4594
 Canon EOS 7D 85mm 1/640th F2.5 ISO3200
|  Canon EOS 7D 85mm 1/640th F2.5 ISO3200
|  Canon EOS 7D 85mm 1/640th F2.5 ISO3200
|
Here you go, forgot I had these. Look at the 100% crop at 50% to see that noise is not a real problem. I am showing crop camera examples, because that is what I have, will a full frame camera do better, probably yes, but remember cropping brings out more noise in both.
Added another photo, after running through Neat Image at default settings |
|
 ExitPremium,ExMod 2002 join:2001-04-10 Canada | reply to LiVE4594
I don't think you need the noise reduction. It just makes the photo look blurry. Can you post a raw file from one of your football shots? I can be a throw away...just want to see how it looks from the camera |
|
 LiVE4594Something Like a PimpPremium join:2002-03-03 Ironton, OH | reply to LiVE4594 Here are two shots that were the better of my darker ones. |
|