 pd01 join:2000-12-11 Saint Petersburg, FL | [General] Wow! 62 Mbps download today on LTE! In Largo, FL today using the Speeedtest.net app I have used since LTE launched I clocked the fastest speed I have ever seen on a cell phone. Several tests at same location clocked high with two results over 60 down and 20 up!
I fanatically test speeds on my phone a lot and have at this same location (a restaurant) before and usually go in the 20's.
Anyone else seen any speed jumps lately? |
|
 | thats impressive. Do you have unlimited data ? |
|
 MikePremium,Mod join:2000-09-17 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:1 | If not, he'd probably have to up his plan after that speed test for the month. |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:23 | reply to pd01
When LTE first launched in my area, I was seeing 70Mbps / 40Mbps results. I haven't seen speeds that high in forever. |
|
 | reply to pd01
Speeds you get will always be dependent on the tower you're on and the backhaul they have provisioned for it. Lighter use towers, their not going to have a ton of bandwidth, probably 10mb down/up. More heavily used towers have higher rates provisioned for them. The good thing with LTE towers is their all fiber fed so it's very easy for verizon to upgrade the speeds on towers if usage goes up vs the old copper T1's they used to have.
I noticed they upgraded the verizon tower at Disney in Orlando the last time I was there. Speed test during middle of the tower clocked in at 60mb/s I was impressed. |
|
 | reply to pd01
That's wicked fast.
Just for fun I thought I would try an LTE speedtest in Oceanside, CA using my MiFi Jetpack:

Not bad but nothing like yours. Enjoy! |
|
 Reviews:
·ooma
·Virgin Mobile Br..
·Charter
·HughesNet Satell..
·Millenicom
| reply to pd01
Didn't happen unless you post a speed test to prove it! LOLOL
said by pd01:In Largo, FL today using the Speeedtest.net app I have used since LTE launched I clocked the fastest speed I have ever seen on a cell phone. Several tests at same location clocked high with two results over 60 down and 20 up!
I fanatically test speeds on my phone a lot and have at this same location (a restaurant) before and usually go in the 20's.
Anyone else seen any speed jumps lately?
|
|
 KA3SGM- -... ...- -Premium join:2006-01-17 West Chester, PA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon FiOS
| reply to pd01
What phone are you using, and does it have a diagnostic fieldtest screen???
I was wondering if you have a way that you can check the channel bandwidth being used(5/10/15/20), or what band that is on.
I am not currently a Verizon customer, but I know they have towers in the Philadelphia, PA market, where they already started adding AWS4 1700/2100 band equipment to many of their existing sites.
Some of their phones can support it, and some can't, but that kind of extra spectrum should be good for 100/50 LTE and even LTE-A, when they put it all into use. -- ROCK 'TIL SUNSET |
|
|
|
 | reply to pd01
Unless you are downloading a single large file the speedtest results are not relevant to real world browser use. A page consists of many frames and many individual files and each requires a separate initialization to occur. My real world download with Verizonwireless 4G LTE is at best 350 kps and on average is around 40 kbs. To download a 80 MB file takes me an hour if I am lucky as I seldom can maintain a connection to the local tower for that long.
I get a tower disconnect multiple times each hour with the Novatel 4620L mifi device and tech support has told me that the tower is overloaded and basically to live with it. DSL would provide higher performance except that AT&T will not provide it in my area and is pulling back from cable broadband expansion in favor of the much more lucrative wireless data service. |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
4 edits
1 recommendation | said by stenman:Unless you are downloading a single large file the speedtest results are not relevant to real world browser use. I second the motion. I use an ftp/cloud service, and I frequently upload/download files that are 100 megs or larger. That, plus very high-speed video streams, are really the best means of measuring a connection's speed.
The speedtest results are useful insofar as they can alert you to mammoth issues. But, unless the speeds are in the mud, they tend to exaggerate the health and speed of a connection. In particular, they don't measure the stability of a connection.
A bandwidth monitor instead, like the one Millenicom recommends that's put out by Rokario.com, gives one a good picture of the latter. If your peaks and valleys are not widely separated then the connection is at least stable and reliable even if it's not particularly fast. On the other hand, if the bandwidth monitor is showing peaks at 6 megs per second but valleys around, say, .4 megs a second, I don't care how fast the peaks are: you don't have a stable or reliable connection, whatever the Speedtest results are. (This is how I know how unhealthy my current Sprint connection, which has been getting "upgraded" since March, is; I get unreliable high-speed streaming and my Rokario Bandwidth Monitor looks like the frigging Himalayas, and it's basically been that way since March.)
So, with regard to that 62 meg per second download you got on Verizon Wireless LTE, I'd be real interested to know what your average speed, and, equally important, your average deviation from same, was when downloading a large file or a high-speed live video stream; a good example of the latter is a Hungarian Windows Media Player dance video stream at »stream02.gtk.hu/dance_tvd (on some Windows 8 computers you will need to copy and paste that directly into your Windows Media Player as it will not play directly from that link; or create a .asx file locally on your computer for that stream, if you know how to do that, and point your Windows Media Player to that file; unfortunately that stream won't play on most Macs). That's where the rubber really hits the road.
That video stream runs at 1.73 megs a second. Yes, there may be faster video streams, but that particular stream appears to be particularly stable and reliable, meaning that if you start having problems with it that's a pretty safe indication that it's your connection that's in trouble, not the stream. (If any of you know of a faster stable video stream, I'm always in the market for them to use for speed tests.)
In addition, one particular astute user here, I believe his user name was Espaeth, turned me on to a site that offers a lot more than just a speed test. It measures jitter, stability, the whole nine yards, and coughs up a description of your connection that covers a lot of activities, not just downloads. The site is located at »www.ispgeeks.com/wild/modules.ph···pipSpeed . Heartily recommended. |
|
 ke4pymPremium join:2004-07-24 Charlotte, NC Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Verizon Broadban..
·Time Warner Cable
·Northland Cable ..
| reply to KA3SGM
said by KA3SGM:I am not currently a Verizon customer, but I know they have towers in the Philadelphia, PA market, where they already started adding AWS4 1700/2100 band equipment to many of their existing sites.
Some of their phones can support it, and some can't,
To my knowledge, only the Galaxy S4 is equipped to handle AWS (after a software update). Have any other AWS enabled phones been put on the market yet? |
|
 | said by ke4pym:said by KA3SGM:I am not currently a Verizon customer, but I know they have towers in the Philadelphia, PA market, where they already started adding AWS4 1700/2100 band equipment to many of their existing sites.
Some of their phones can support it, and some can't,
To my knowledge, only the Galaxy S4 is equipped to handle AWS (after a software update). Have any other AWS enabled phones been put on the market yet? The Nokia Lumia 928 is supposed to be able to cover the LTE AWS band after an update sometime before the end of the year AFAIK. |
|
 | Verizonwireless towers are located so as to handle phone usage by motorists and not for supporting residential customers. If you happen to be near a tower that has light usage then you will get good speeds. If you live near a heavily used tower or in wooded terrain then the performance will be barely better than dial-up.
Part of the performance problems we are experiencing are due to a problem with how the Novatel 4620L performs DHCP. We continually have IP conflicts which in theory is impossible and yet the bad code in the 4620L mifi device does this continually. I wish we could use a static IP and not have to use the 4620L's defective DHCP implementation but there is no way to do this.
It explains in large part why people using USB modems have better throughput and fewer connection problems. The DHCP is being handled by the wireless router and not the Novatel 4620L mifi device. |
|