 neochu
join:2008-12-12
Windsor, ON | reply to HeadSpinning
Re: Post your NON tsi speed tests! said by HeadSpinning:said by neochu:This is Annex M as well. We don't have Annex M enabled. You're on a 7040/1024 profile, so minus 15% ATM overhead, that's about what you should be getting. Im actually synching on the modem right now at 6750/1025. XD With or without "M" involved.
Oh the craziness these poor lines have gone through over the past 4 years i lived here. (mosty pushing the CRAP out of them)
I wouldn't have it any other way though |
|
neochu
join:2008-12-12
Windsor, ON | reply to HeadSpinning
(double post) |
|
|
|
| Both sides need to have it on before it will negotiate. Your end being on or off won't make a difference.
Your current stats are:
In Sync: true
Reading Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:51:42 -0400
State Change: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:45:44 -0400
Up/Down Time: 5 mins, 58 secs
Latency: interleaved
Bitrate: 6750 kbps \ 1025 kbps
Max Bitrate: 8068 kbps \ 1025 kbps
Capacity: 83.7 % \ 100 %
SNR: 6.7 dB \ 11.3 dB
Attenuation: 51.5 dB \ 34.9 dB
Cell Count: null \ null
Trans Mode: ADSL2+
I wonder if we could squeeze some more upstream out of your line by tweaking the impulse noise protection setting.
--
MNSi Internet - »www.mnsi.net |
|
| reply to pstewart
would 800-900m give the full 10? |
|
neochu
join:2008-12-12
Windsor, ON | reply to HeadSpinning
said by HeadSpinning:I wonder if we could squeeze some more upstream out of your line by tweaking the impulse noise protection setting. My poor lines... |
|
 pstewartPremium,VIP
join:2005-10-12
Peterborough, ON
kudos:1 | reply to eeeaddict
I'm going to say "most likely" with the caveat of line conditions etc.... |
|
| reply to neochu
said by neochu:My poor lines... Your choice - doesn't physically hurt the lines to try. At worst, your connection could become unstable, and the setting would have to be changed back.
--
MNSi Internet - »www.mnsi.net |
|
Reviews:
 ·ELECTRONICBOX
| reply to eeeaddict
|
|
Reviews:
·ELECTRONICBOX
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to eeeaddict
|
|
Reviews:
 ·voip.ms
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to eeeaddict
25/10
-DM |
|
| reply to eeeaddict
Paying for 5/0.6, can't get better speeds unless we get a second line and pay $40 more. The sooner they bring Fiber, the better!
--
If I post in a forum such as AT&T or Verizon, it's usually with a good reason. I lurk in these sections all the time so I know my stuff. I am also CompTIA A+ Certified. |
|
| wouldn't the unlimited lte just be faster/better than dsl? |
|
| reply to eeeaddict
Good evening ,
See all ISP's provide a shared bandwidth not a dedicated one (dedicated ones like leased line will charge a lot of money ) , DSL technology support sharing of bandwidth, so when you take a connectivity, always ISP signs a contract stating that they will be providing you connection speed up to 30 Mbps or 16 Mbps etc ..
Many times it has been found the routers doesn't support higher speeds , so please check with the router vender , or check the line noise ratio it will give you a better understanding on line status .
if all are fine then check with ISP to route your packets with a non populated pops |
|
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to eeeaddict
Bell 25/10
|
|
Reviews:
·CIKTEL Telecom
| reply to eeeaddict
CIK 45/4....nuf said |
|
| reply to vonSchroeder
Glorious CIK...45/4
|
|
 DavePC
join:2013-08-18
Scarborough, ON
·Start Communicat..
| reply to eeeaddict
during peak hours:
|
|
Reviews:
 ·Bell Fibe
·TekSavvy Cable
1 edit | reply to eeeaddict
Bell Fibe (at home)
Proof: »www.speedtest.net/my-result/2989952663
At School
Proof: »www.speedtest.net/my-result/2961896859 |
|
| reply to ipse
WHY the hell are you guys using DC server? |
|
| 
|
|
Reviews:
·CIKTEL Telecom
4 edits | reply to eeeaddict
Because that's where my VPN server is, so getting 10Meg to TO doesn't really help me qualify the connection, does it?
It just makes one feel marginally better and determine if congestion is on his last mile or upstream.
In this case it is upstream.
»www.speedtest.net/my-result/2981···=sharev1
Do you agree the problem occurs at peak time now considering THIS is what I get when no one cares:
Happy? Oh, and before you ask "why the hell 3Mbps up and not 4" - I have QoS enabled right now, it wasn't before.
PS For the patient reader, this is what traffic analysis for a bad ISP looks like:
Connection Analysis
Test Type: Quality Test
Location:
Download Speed: 13535 kbps
Upload Speed: 2986 kbps
Speed Consistency: 79 %
Round Trip Time: 2 ms
Max Route Speed: 262140 kbps
Max Pause: 49 ms
Bandwidth: 61336 kbps
Forced Idle: 55
Average Delay: 2 ms
Round Trip Time Consistency: 6 %
Concurrent TCP: 4.5
Upload Speed Consistency: 96 %
Test Type: s / s
TCP MTU: 1492
TCP Receive Stats
Packets not in order: 179
Bytes out of order: 258548
Packets outside TCP Window: 0
Bytes after rec. window: 0
Bytes Lost: 53920
»www.connectionanalyzer.com/ |
|
scorpidoPremium
join:2009-11-02
New Hamburg, ON
kudos:1 | reply to eeeaddict
Bluwest Wireless I'm 7 hops away from the fiber on the top one, and on the bottom that's at my head-end at the fiber |
|
| reply to eeeaddict
I'm just curious, why "non-teksavvy"???? Why exclude one of the biggest IISP's out there from this thread? |
|
Reviews:
·Bell Fibe
·TekSavvy Cable
·Videotron
| reply to eeeaddict
|
|
Reviews:
·Acanac
·ELECTRONICBOX
| All that for the low-low price of your first born and a pound of flesh every month..... |
|
| 134$ for unlimited 175Mbits
6 month ago, I was with TSI 60Mbits unlimited .... at 135$! |
|
jcmh
join:2008-12-13
Ottawa, ON | reply to eeeaddict
|
|
1 edit | @ jcmh: How do you get a connection like that? |
|
jcmh
join:2008-12-13
Ottawa, ON | said by iUnReaL:@ jcmh: How do you get a connection like that?
We're a small ISP... I guess I have an unfair advantage  |
|
| I just sent you a PM.
As for my speed tests, here it is, but I'm experiencing bad button lag (online gaming) with Bell... first few days were amazing though:
|
|
