dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
229
share rss forum feed


wsanders

join:2002-09-18
Lafayette, CA

No more QAM in 94549

Woke up this morning to no more unencrypted channels in 94549 (Lafayette CA).

Last time we tried getting a decoder box it only had NTSC and modulated Ch3/4 output.

Goodbye to local HD channels with basic tier?

Unfortunately my wife refuses to allow a dish. We might try AT&T but I have a question I'll post over in that forum - we have crappy wiring in the neighborhood, no one gets more than 4 Mbit over DSL. If I sign up for an HD tier with AT&T, will they commit to upgrading the neighborhood wiring to the point I can watch HD?


osravens

join:2011-01-26
Cumberland, MD

Since everyone is encrypted, why not just stay with Comcast?


dishrich

join:2006-05-12
Springfield, IL
reply to wsanders

said by wsanders:

Last time we tried getting a decoder box it only had NTSC and modulated Ch3/4 output.

Try again; systems that have encrypted limited basic NOW have HD-DTA's available. Limited basic subs can get at least 2 HD-DTA's FREE, & do NOT have to pay an (extra) HD tech fee. You're best bet is to go to your local office to pick them up; they should also know about the "no HD fee" thing for limited subs.

»[DTA] HD-DTA's are here in Springfield, IL - a review


wsanders

join:2002-09-18
Lafayette, CA
reply to osravens

In our area, at least, Comcast is substantially more expensive than AT&T for an equivalent TV/Internet/voice package. Additionally, when I visit other people's homes the picture quality of Xfinity, at least for non-HD tiers, is crap. I can do better with my 2 Mbit DSL connection and a Roku/Apple TV/etc box.`


System
reply to wsanders

This topic has been closed. Reason: More suitable topic exists

See: »Report notifications of Limited Basic tier encryption here