 sbrookPremium,Mod join:2001-12-14 Ottawa kudos:11 Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·TekSavvy Cable
4 recommendations | reply to krhemtulla
Re: [Cable] Avoid TekSavvy at all costs I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want ... you're giving them back their oligopoly with its monopolistic behaviour.
You may get some deals for a while, but when they've pushed the TPIAs like TekSavvy out of business because you've convinced everybody to go to the incumbent, those deals will go away and they'll continue to rape your wallet.
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour. |
|
 | said by sbrook:I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want ... you're giving them back their oligopoly with its monopolistic behaviour.
You may get some deals for a while, but when they've pushed the TPIAs like TekSavvy out of business because you've convinced everybody to go to the incumbent, those deals will go away and they'll continue to rape your wallet.
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour.
So you are telling others what to do because somebody else is telling otherwise?
Again a moderator of any forum supporting TSI, is biased opinion for this forum. And about anti-competitive behaviour, is not Proven. Yet. |
|
 sbrookPremium,Mod join:2001-12-14 Ottawa kudos:11 Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·TekSavvy Cable
1 edit
4 recommendations | loosedobs
Re anti-competitive behaviour ... If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.
Remember that our incumbents have been hauled before the CRTC for anticompetitive behaviour in other areas of their business and fined, but it tends not to stop them if they think they can get away with it.
Remember too that we aren't saying in this case that it's deliberate anticompetitive behaviour, but the results very much are anti-competitive. And the CNOC presentation is to ensure that the behaviours exhibited by the incumbents are not anti-competitive. |
|
 1 edit | reply to loosedobbs
said by loosedobbs:What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour. krhemtulla, yes this is frustrating, but I also urge you not to leave just yet. I support TSI because we (all Canadian Internet users) need to break the oligopoly choke imposed by a few "incumbents" on our collective neck. Not because I am terribly happy with TSI either (my cable link has been down for 9 days already and all I have is promises at this point). But there is hope that TSI will finally resolve its issues and would continue to provide viable alternative. |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to sbrook
said by sbrook:I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want ... you're giving them back their oligopoly with its monopolistic behaviour.
You may get some deals for a while, but when they've pushed the TPIAs like TekSavvy out of business because you've convinced everybody to go to the incumbent, those deals will go away and they'll continue to rape your wallet.
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour.
Or you can join Start instead. |
|
 sbrookPremium,Mod join:2001-12-14 Ottawa kudos:11 Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·TekSavvy Cable
| As much as I respect Start or any other TPIA, the reality is that when start gets big enough, the impact of their shenannigans on Start customers will increase!
So, it doesn't matter what TPIA you're with, eventually you'll be stung by the wasp! |
|
 | reply to sbrook
Im living the same situation Videotron in QC. The mean and big ISP excuse si getting old. If this is true teksavvy should complain to the CRTC on their customer behalf. |
|
 koreybReplace the CRTC NOW join:2005-01-08 East York, ON | They already have... That's that the CNOC complaint is about.. |
|
 | reply to FredFortin
»[Cable] CRTC - CNOC Part 1 Cable Carrier Services & Update
 |
|
|
|
 | reply to edojan
I completely understand the points mentioned. Since TekSavvy knows that their requests already take a long time to be processed they should first communicate that to the customers and set their expectations correctly. Had I known, I wouldn't have cancelled my other service so early. Secondly, there is hardly an escalation process. Whether I have just subscribed or have been waiting for 30 days, the resolution time is 24-48 hrs and they claim that they can't do anything about it. Finally and most importantly cut down the errors on their end. In my case the tech should have been at my place much earlier. It was Teksavvy who cancelled the appointment that we had already agreed on without consulting me.
Another thing to be aware of: When requesting to cancel in such a situation you have to let them complete their troubleshooting - it's in the fine print. I'm now being told that it is my own fault that I agreed to those terms. Sound familiar? |
|
 | Hi krhemtulla,
I would like to look into your account and see what can be done. I want to ensure that we have the agents who made those errors coached out also. Could you you please PM me TSI Jonathan your account information please?
Thank you,
TSI Jonathan -- Online Experience Manager Authorized TSI employee - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
|
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | reply to sbrook
said by sbrook:As much as I respect Start or any other TPIA, the reality is that when start gets big enough, the impact of their shenannigans on Start customers will increase!
So, it doesn't matter what TPIA you're with, eventually you'll be stung by the wasp!
Exactly, Start's customer base is a tiny fraction of TSI's. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden : Personal attacks
|
 | reply to sbrook
Re: [Cable] Avoid TekSavvy at all costs said by sbrook:I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want ... you're giving them back their oligopoly with its monopolistic behaviour.
You may get some deals for a while, but when they've pushed the TPIAs like TekSavvy out of business because you've convinced everybody to go to the incumbent, those deals will go away and they'll continue to rape your wallet.
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour.
Greaaat and who will feed my family as I cannot work as there is no Internet. This is business, not a joke or donation. It has to be a solid business model. TS does not have one and deserves to die. I will not wait for it while CEO gets hefty income from my money for non-existent service. Help yourself. |
|
 Reviews:
·ELECTRONICBOX
| said by fifthelement:Greaaat and who will feed my family as I cannot work as there is no Internet. This is business, not a joke or donation. It has to be a solid business model. TS does not have one and deserves to die. I will not wait for it while CEO gets hefty income from my money for non-existent service. Help yourself. Sheesh, if feeding your family relies on the internet at home, then don't change ISP. I know I wouldn't.
It's that simple
.. and I don't think sbrook was urging everyone to leave their current ISP either.
(or am I missing something..? Ah well.. ) |
|
 jett join:2003-06-28 Kitchener, ON 2 edits | reply to fifthelement
if your Internet is critical to feed your family, why the hell wouldn't you have more than one solution, how about a robust connection rather than simple residential service.... buy a fiber feed from bell,rogers, and your local utility heck why not go right to the tier 1 transit providers, wouldn't mind a fiber link right to level3 or UUNET myself...
though likely the last mile would be provided by bell or local utilities  |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to fifthelement
said by fifthelement:said by sbrook:I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want ... you're giving them back their oligopoly with its monopolistic behaviour.
You may get some deals for a while, but when they've pushed the TPIAs like TekSavvy out of business because you've convinced everybody to go to the incumbent, those deals will go away and they'll continue to rape your wallet.
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour.
Greaaat and who will feed my family as I cannot work as there is no Internet. This is business, not a joke or donation. It has to be a solid business model. TS does not have one and deserves to die. I will not wait for it while CEO gets hefty income from my money for non-existent service. Help yourself. I really doubt the CEO is sitting with his feet up on his desk smoking a big fat cigar with massive sacks of money behind him. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden : Personal attacks
|
 cssoz join:2013-07-24 canada | reply to sbrook
Re: [Cable] Avoid TekSavvy at all costs said by sbrook:I have only one comment ... in leaving and urging others to stay away, then you will be giving in to Robelus and giving them exactly what they want
What you SHOULD be doing is supporting the CNOC Part 1 filing with the CRTC so they can stop the incumbent providers from their anti-competitive behaviour.
krhemtulla, Read that and why i am still with Teksavvy because i was screwed enough times with shit internet package (b4 they copied Teksvvy) and having to pay god knows how much more. |
|
 KC_ join:2013-06-10 North York, ON | reply to Anon
Karma,, works both ways, seems you're getting yours already |
|