dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
17
34764170 (banned)
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

1 recommendation

34764170 (banned) to McBane

Member

to McBane

Re: [Networking] IPv6

said by McBane:

CGN is such a joke. It's the "I fail" button for ISPs, wireless excluded.

Wireless isn't excluded. There isn't unlimited IPv4 address space. This is one of the biggest reasons IPv6 exists in the first place. NAT (PAT) only exists in the common usage scenario because IPv4 wasn't designed properly in the first place.
McBane
join:2008-08-22
Wylie, TX

1 recommendation

McBane

Member

said by 34764170:

said by McBane:

CGN is such a joke. It's the "I fail" button for ISPs, wireless excluded.

Wireless isn't excluded. There isn't unlimited IPv4 address space. This is one of the biggest reasons IPv6 exists in the first place. NAT (PAT) only exists in the common usage scenario because IPv4 wasn't designed properly in the first place.

True, true. With the infinite number of IPv6 addresses it should be mandatory.