dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
7
share rss forum feed

Willectro

join:2013-02-09
reply to resa1983

Re: Voltage decision is in

So why just TS then?


resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10

said by Willectro:

So why just TS then?

Test case for going after TPIA?
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP


TSI Marc
Premium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:28

Press release: »Voltage vs. Doe decision - TekSavvy press release
--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy



Buster Brown

@videotron.ca
reply to Willectro

said by Willectro:

So why just TS then?

It wasn't just TSI in the last year or so.

It was Bell, Rogers, Videotron and Distributel as far as I can recall.

In these cases those 4 entities just said yeah we won't challenge anything, just give us a court order and we will let you know who these people are.

Distributel back-tracked and then put up a fight and the troll ran away and dropped the case.

The Montreal cases were also dropped.

This left the Ontario cases, and I heard nothing about it since. I think these people got extortion letters. But not sure what happened after that.

Then they went after TSI.

While the above involved Voltage and another company in BC, as can be seen, it wasn't just TSI. I think you can find the info in the Canadian broadband forum for these cases if you use the search term "recoil" and "Montreal Canadians" (I did some DNS's on the IP's and found out they were going to sue the Montreal Canadians).

Nope... Not only TSI.

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10

Searching for "NGN" should bring it up.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP