said by technocar2:So are you saying it doesn't violate AUP?
I'm saying how can it?....the connections in question act simply as part of your LAN, with my connections on that segment of the LAN, they have IP addresses in the same subnet as mine....my Ubiquiti Nanostation m5's have an IP of 192.168.1.27 on one side and 192.168.1.28 on the other side so that I can access the web admin for each device, but again, it all acts as part of my LAN, so I don't know how it can violate an AUP.
Its unfortunate to the OP that LOS isn't going to work due to terrain levels, the equipment is quite good and they do work quite well even without line of sight directly and even through walls (at one point on the other end I had the device mounted inside and it was still able to get good signal strength, in the 300mbit/sec range between the 2 points, I have an old WRT54Gv3 that has its own access point because I only have 6mbit DSL out there so it works ok for my parents when they want to be in the "shed" and still have wireless access). (its more like a really big fancy garage than a shed).
EDIT: To the OP, I'd say that you're in some bad luck situation, unless you're going to end up being in a subdivision their "ROI" for your cable connection is that they'd never get what they'd have to install out of your $100/month services....its probably 20k or so....
I remember working with the 'Blue Cable Network' and we had a request for an installation, it was pulling the equipment simply 500m down the street in question and the quote was $6k.....he was some well to do financial guy, so he did it.
So, unless you're financially well to do, I'd say good luck
.