dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
43
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

rradina

Member

Good or Bad for Consumers?

Let us buy Time Warner Cable, Comcast argues, and our generous adherence to largely meaningless net neutrality rules will cover more people, benefitting everyone.
I know the article paraphrases what Comcast said but if they said something even remotely implying "benefiting everyone", why would they say that? Haven't carriers argued against net neutrality by saying the rules actually hurt consumers? Why are they offering adherence to defunct rules as a merger concession if their past argument is that such these rules actually hurt consumers?
Skippy25
join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Skippy25

Member

Because they talk out of both sides of theit mouth hoping nobody is smart enough to figure it out.