dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
16

FureverFurry
RIP Daphne: 3/12/05 - 6/19/12
Premium Member
join:2012-02-20
49xxx
Zoom 5341J
ARRIS WBM760
Vonage VDV-21

FureverFurry to camper

Premium Member

to camper

Re: [CustSvc] Re: Comcast Confessions: why the cable guy is always late

said by camper:

It is as if Comcast is researching new ways to excel at horrendous customer support.

It's not "as if" -- Comcast IS finding new ways to provide horrendous customer service. I suppose it's good to have a goal :-(. Many, if not most, companies know that providing good customer service is the backbone of their livelihood. Then there is Comcast.

I got a chuckle out of the article referencing the CAEs now asking for one's account number to have access to the account when (supposedly) it is NOT needed for troubleshooting. Had that happen to me a month ago. By sheer screaming "no !" and "do NOT touch anything on my account" did I escape getting crammed with phone service. The kindly (??) agent said he'd set me up with a "really fast modem that you can even plug your phone into. Don't you want to plug your phone into a modem?" Arghhh.

NetFixer
From My Cold Dead Hands
Premium Member
join:2004-06-24
The Boro
Netgear CM500
Pace 5268AC
TRENDnet TEW-829DRU

2 recommendations

NetFixer

Premium Member

said by FureverFurry:

I got a chuckle out of the article referencing the CAEs now asking for one's account number to have access to the account when (supposedly) it is NOT needed for troubleshooting. Had that happen to me a month ago. By sheer screaming "no !" and "do NOT touch anything on my account" did I escape getting crammed with phone service.

The concept of "every employee is a salesperson" is not new, nor is it exclusive to Comcast; and it is one of the reasons I pulled the ripcord on my corporate golden parachute two decades ago. I had worked for almost 30 years as a field engineer for what was at one time a major computer mainframe and networking company (who shall remain nameless because I am embarrassed to have been associated with their last incarnation). But after several mergers (each one another step closer to disaster), I drew the line and said "stop the train -- I want to get off" after I was told that from that day forward my primary job was to up-sell products and services to customers, and that my duties as an engineer were to provide "an illusion of service" to the customers (after all they were too stupid to notice that they were being fleeced). While that kind of attitude might work for companies selling products and services to the vast consumer market, I knew that it would not fly for providing products and services to the enterprise segment of the market (and I left before my grandfathered golden parachute option ended). Very shortly after I reached the end of my corporate subsidized unemployment, and after waiting for my non-competitive agreement to expire (so that I could once again work in the same industry and do business with former customers), that post-merger company disappeared into the mist (or perhaps sank into the bog might be a better metaphor). Fortunately, my pension fund was transferred to an annuity with an independent financial institution (a former customer) before I left (and before the company could disappear with the pension fund).

However I don't expect Comcast to suffer in the least for their screw the customer policies, because they largely have a captive customer base, and the principle of "a new one is born every second" more than makes up for any minor customer churn. And yes, I still do business with them because compared to the alternative for affordable HSI in this area, Comcast is technologically superior and is a corporate saint. I have no realistic alternative for TV service (including OTA or satellite because of physical impediments) -- I could do without TV, but my lifelong housemate refuses to consider cutting the cord.
rody_44
Premium Member
join:2004-02-20
Quakertown, PA

2 edits

rody_44 to FureverFurry

Premium Member

to FureverFurry
Comcast asking for your account number has nothing to do with slamming. A comcast account slammed is very very rare. In fact as long as i have been a member here i have not seen anyone claim the account was slammed. Thats a food for thought when reading forums on the internet.

They cant troubleshoot your connection without already having your account in front of them. That being said they really only need your phone number or address to pull your account up. As far as your account being slammed when you called comcast for trouble shooting. Thats never going to happen as comcasts computer keeps track of every single account and who they are talking to. YOU WILL NEVER BE SLAMMED CALLING comcast. First they need to find your account and than they need you to prove you have authorization on account.

They need to identify you and than they need to have you prove who you are. The proof is generally the last 4 numbers of your social security number. As far as some x tech saying he slammed customers take note he is a x tech.

train_wreck
slow this bird down
join:2013-10-04
Antioch, TN
Cisco ASA 5506
Cisco DPC3939

train_wreck

Member

said by rody_44:

YOU WILL NEVER BE SLAMMED CALLING comcast.

I don't know, i might consider all these "incorrect" modem rental charges as a form of "slamming", no matter how hard Comcast might claim it is just a "billing error".
said by FureverFurry:

Don't you want to plug your phone into a modem?