dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
53

jlivingood
Premium Member
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

2 recommendations

jlivingood

Premium Member

Blog post

See »corporate.comcast.com/co ··· t-on-tor

Plus One
@73.160.110.x

Plus One

Anon

+1
Thanks for quickly making it official and debunking the nonsense put forward by some deluded bloggers.

CapStar362
@71.199.159.x

CapStar362

Anon

i LOVE this part:

The CSA team provides further education and information about copyright infringement and only they have the ability to remove the in-browser alert from the customer’s web browser. If an appeal is filed, then the transmission of alerts is suspended until the review is complete. If the appeal prevails, then the alert history is reset, and all previous alerts are removed. If the appeal does not prevail, the mitigation alert is applied to the customer’s service, and a call is required to CSA.

Only they can remove a persistent in-browser alert in the USER's browser. so what are they doing to make your browser start showing this alert? are they redirecting? thats crap if they can hijack my browser! more of a reason to USE TOR.
NOVA_UAV_Guy
Premium Member
join:2012-12-14
Purcellville, VA

NOVA_UAV_Guy

Premium Member

Rather than worrying about in-browser alerts and the like, Comcast should focus on keeping its nose out of anything and everything its customers do, unless it negatively impacts network stability.

Neither Comcast nor any other ISP should consider being part of the "kangaroo court" style process for any system, whether it be six strikes, sixteen strikes, or six million strikes. If sufficient evidence exists, copyright holders should take those who they believe are infringing on their copyrights to court and let a judge and/or jury come up with a verdict based upon the evidence and logical reasoning. Such a procedure would benefit all involved, as copyright holders would be less capricious with their claims and the average person, knowing that they'd likely face stiffer penalties, would be less likely to engage in "casual piracy".