 TZi
join:2001-07-05
Miami Beach, FL
| reply to 2farfromCO7
Re: Rome wasn't built in a day said by 2farfromCO:
What really pisses me off though is that these monopolies try to convince people that regulation is bad, and for the most part, people have bought that scam hook, line, and sinker for the last 7 years(since 1995). Many of us people here who have half a brain realize that government realize that government agency are far efficient, productive, and accountable for their actions than unregulated monpolies. However, those views would make us traitors in today's society.
You're right, but how much more regulated can the telecommunications industry get? I mean, the phone company has to be the most heavily regulated and oldest monopoly in the country. Granted, I don't think more regulation or de-regulation is the solution here. The FCC is probably about as efficient as the soon-to-be-canned INS. They ought to split the FCC into "wired" and "wireless" regulatory agencies and rewrite the existing regulations in a manner that is more concise and effective for the current situation in this country... Regulating the phone companies even more at this point would just add more bureaucracy to the equation and draw things out even more. Both the phone companies and the FCC are behemoth institutions that can't be asked to really know what they're doing or take responsibility for it.... Mohammed Attah probably got approved for his DSL circuit about the same time they sent his visa to the flight school...
--
Miami Hurricanes #1 (we're back!)
[text was edited by author 2002-04-14 22:14:35]
[text was edited by author 2002-04-14 22:16:31] |
|
 pupowskiPremium
join:2002-03-22
Vancouver, WA | said by TZi:
The FCC is probably about as efficient as the soon-to-be-canned INS.
The FCC chairman is a sabotageur, deliberately obstructing regulation to suit his idiology. The INS is just incompetent, a lesser evil.. |
|
|
|
 JakCrow
join:2001-12-06
Palo Alto, CA | reply to TZi
Competition is needed within each "segment" of the industry, i.e. in telcom, cable, and sat. There could have been great competition that would have driven new modes of network access to most markets, but the telcoms and cables have been swallowing each other up (which shouldn't have been allowed) and the same is going to happen to sat if it isn't stopped. These consolidations are what's threatening broadband deployment, not regulations. Look at what happens when there are 2 or more telcoms or cable companies serving one area: better service, more features, and better pricing. (deregulation will drive prices down my ass) I don't think there is an issue with more or less regulation, but every entity involved should be forced to obey EXISTING regulations. I also think that various regulatory bodies and officials should be investigated for corruption and bribery, but that's just my opinion. |
|
 amdazPremium
join:2000-12-29
San Francisco, CA | reply to pupowski
I dont like Ideologue, and young Mr. Powell is definitely one. It is a wonder considering how reasonable his Daddy is. |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| said by amdaz:
I dont like Ideologue, and young Mr. Powell is definitely one. It is a wonder considering how reasonable his Daddy is.
Oh, Mr. Powell Snr. definitely has his ideologue, as well... but he's considerably better about being diplomatic about it. |
|
pupowskiPremium
join:2002-03-22
Vancouver, WA | reply to amdaz
said by amdaz:
I dont like Ideologue, and young Mr. Powell is definitely one. It is a wonder considering how reasonable his Daddy is.
His dad is a good man, but this apple fell far from the tree. |
|
