 DaveDudeNo Fear
join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
 ·Vonage
·ViaTalk
| reply to DSLGuy0
Re: is that your opinion or is that based on fact? said by DSLGuy:
I'm curious how SBC/SNET f'ed up the lines in CT? Please explain.
Now I'm really confused.. How does adding DSL to Oklahoma spell disaster for OK users? What other company is going to build out the infrastructure? Or should OK remain in the dark?
Call me confused here, but I don't get your arguments.
What about parts of New Jersey, its baffles me that parts of NJ, the most populated state in the union, DSL isnt offered, or available because of DLCs. I dont think this would happen in Jersey because there are already a few competitors.
In regards to other companies, Verizon, SBC have proven they refuse to work with any other companies. So DSL should now become a basic service, DSL must be provided.
--
oooookay......... |
|
lvas
join:2001-05-17
Glen Carbon, IL | dsl a basic service? Verizon & SBC have proven they can work with other companies & they do every day. Both RBOC’s have lost major access line numbers to competitors in the last couple of years. You might not like it,
But those are the facts. Now I’m not going to say they don’t make it difficult to when & where the
Legally Can – sure why not. After all – while they might have to give the knife over to there competitiors (equipment access) they don't have to stand still while its plunged into their backs.
As for DSL being a basic service – dream on. Where are the monies going to come from to deploy
DSL to everyone? Maybe you haven’t heard the news lately – but most telcom companies are just
A little bit worried about just staying afloat. Let alone building out a DSL network at great
Cost per house passed – when only about 20% of houses are buying when it is available. |
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL | said by lvas:
Maybe you haven't heard the news lately but most telcom companies are just A little bit worried about just staying afloat.
So worried in fact that after a regulatory relief law is passed they find the funds to build out DSL networks in OK. Doesn't this prove Bells are abusing their monopoly status in the local loop?
Time for another Teddy Roosevelt type of trust buster!!! |
|
| reply to DaveDude
Re: is that your opinion or is that based on fact? said by DamnDave:
What about parts of New Jersey, its baffles me that parts of NJ, the most populated state in the union, DSL isnt offered, or available because of DLCs. I dont think this would happen in Jersey because there are already a few competitors.
In regards to other companies, Verizon, SBC have proven they refuse to work with any other companies. So DSL should now become a basic service, DSL must be provided.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but last time I checked, New Jersey has MUCH fewer people than California, Texas and New York... Where did you even come up with NJ being the "most populated state in the union?"
Boogie |
|
dbarc
join:2000-01-22
Fort Wayne, IN | said by boogie74:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but last time I checked, New Jersey has MUCH fewer people than California, Texas and New York... Where did you even come up with NJ being the "most populated state in the union?"
Boogie
He only left out a word. New Jersey is the most DENSELY populated state in the union. |
|
|
|
| »www.census.gov/population/census···stco.txt
According to this site, Jersey has 1042 people per square mile while California only has 190...so New Jersey wins hands down!
Damn, where is everyone living??? |
|
